Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU

Open up your wallet and say ouch

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

We won't spend too much time on the 1080p gaming results. Yes, the RTX 4070 Ti can run 1080p ultra settings very fast — nearly as fast as any other graphics card in our rasterization test suite, where the 4090 only delivers 18% more performance on average. Basically, any of the GPUs in our charts work just fine for 1080p gaming, even with ray tracing turned on — well, maybe not the 6800 XT in a few of the DXR games.

Overall performance was 94 fps across our DXR test suite, and 145 fps in rasterization games. About the only games in the rasterization suite that didn't break 144 fps are CPU limited titles like MSFS — which conveniently also offers DLSS 3 support. The ray tracing games all broke 60 fps as well.

Want even higher frame rates? Yes, you can improve performance even more with medium quality settings. We're pretty much CPU limited across the rasterization suite — the 4090 is only 8% faster on average, mostly thanks to PTR that's still somewhat GPU limited. DXR games do still benefit from the faster GPU, but now the 4090 is only 36% faster overall, though BMI, CP77, and MC still see a decent boost.

Anyway, if you have a 240 Hz monitor with G-Sync support, you can get close to the refresh rate at 1080p and medium to high settings in a lot of games.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • oofdragon
    The price is Not almost palatable, stop trying to sell this nonsense
    Reply
  • sabicao
    Admin said:
    Our GeForce RTX 4070 Ti testing reveals good performance and efficiency, but this is a large jump in generational pricing that will displease many gamers. It's barely faster than the previous generation RTX 3080 Ti and 3080 12GB, at a relatively similar price, with DLSS 3 being the potential grace.

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU : Read more

    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    oofdragon said:
    The price is Not almost palatable, stop trying to sell this nonsense
    Do you not know what "almost" means? And while some would take "palatable" to mean really tasty, that's not the way I normally use it. I use it more as "acceptable but not awesome." I wouldn't call an excellent dinner "palatable," I'd say it was delicious or some other word that means I really like it. Taco Bell is palatable, for example. So is Wendy's. But neither is great, just like an $800 replacement that's only moderately faster than the outgoing $800 cards.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    sabicao said:
    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.
    They're only "wrong" when everyone refuses to pay them. Unfortunately, we're being shown time and time again that there are apparently enough people willing to spend $800 for this level of performance that we'll continue to see them. As stated in the conclusion, if Nvidia had tried to sell this as a $600 card, or a $500 card, and then scalpers just snapped them all up and asked for $800 or more, we'd be right back where we started. Except then we'd have scalpers contributing nothing and taking a chunk of the profits.

    So yeah, don't buy a $800 card if you don't want to spend that much. Wait for prices to come down, or go with a cheaper and slower alternative. But if others keep paying a lot more than you're willing to pay, nothing is going to change.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Cheaper than expected…
    Lets see what real price end up after two to tree weeks… when those few ”cheap” MSRP GPUs run out… $1200?
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Hmmm, appreciate the review Jared, yet I gotta object to your "almost" endearing tone and conclusion. Also, you insist that this is an $800 card, yet the TUF gaming you reviewed here reportedly costs $850.
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    "Portal RTX at 24 fps on a 4090 gets 42 fps with Frame Generation enabled, but without upscaling, but it still feels like 24 fps. That's because the user input is still running at 24 fps."

    Wow really? Never knew this, interesting tidbit.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Thanks for the review!

    This is a big can of "meh; pass". Much like with the 7900XT. Ironically, the 7900XTX made the 4080-16GB look better and now nVidia returning the hand, making the 7900XT less stupid. They're still both in stupid territory, though.

    I mostly agree with everything, so nothing more to add, really. Maybe just the mention this card won't have an FE (as I've read and heard), so the first batch of $800 cards will last whatever the AIBs want them to be on shelves. Which, I'm sure, won't be long. This card will be over $850 for sure.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    sabicao said:
    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.

    He did say it. In the title.

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU
    Open up your wallet and say ouch

    He said it professionally, many times through out his review. I am going to assume you didn't read the whole review, so maybe you should, its there.

    These cards are palatable, because most plebs pay for them. As long as everyone keeps paying these prices, Nvidia is going to keep charging them. If you all want gpu prices lower, skip a gen or two, speak with your money, not your mouth.
    Reply
  • DavidLejdar
    Seems a bit weak-ish for 4K gaming, and there are cheaper GPUs, which work fine for 1440p gaming. It still has quite some performance, and the 4K FPS are not bad as such. The numbers just don't convince me that it wouldn't drop below 60 (real) FPS at 4K with the next round of game releases, so I wouldn't pick it up for 4K at that price.

    And scalpers sure may be an issue, but if the RTX 4070 Ti is meant as "the entry-level GPU for 4K gaming, or for top 1440p gaming", then it wouldn't necessarily be a miscalculation if it would be produced in higher numbers, so that scalpers would have a garage full of them while they still would be in-stock at the retailers.
    Reply