Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU

Open up your wallet and say ouch

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

While Nvidia would like you to think the RTX 4070 Ti can easily handle 4K gaming — and it can, particularly if you turn a few settings down a notch and enable higher upscaling ratios — it really comes into its own at 1440p. We do start to encounter CPU bottlenecks, even on the 13900K and 7950X, but overall performance now ends up at nearly 120 fps, compared to just 69 fps at 4K.

The 4070 Ti also managed to tie the 3090 Ti this time, and there's a slightly larger performance advantage for the 13900K over the 7950X. It's a bit interesting that the 4070 Ti performance improves a bit relative to 4K, but that's likely due to the 192-bit memory interface and 48MB L2 cache — it's not quite enough to fully handle 4K gaming without some hiccups, basically.

The 4070 Ti ended up 12% faster than the 3080 Ti, but only 44% faster than the 3070 Ti. That's because we don't have stuff like TWW3 tanking the 8GB card's performance now. It's also only 6% slower than the 7900 XT and still edges past the RX 6950 XT by 6%.

Since we're at a lower resolution and starting to hit CPU limits, DLSS doesn't offer quite as much this time. MSFS ran 3% slower, FH5 was just 2% faster, but the other four games improved by larger amounts — 11% in HZD, 32% in PTR, 18% in RDR2, and 22% in WDL. DLSS 3 can help overcome those limits, however, and provides an additional 99% boost in MSFS and 48% in PTR.

Complex ray tracing games still remain pretty GPU limited, with the 4070 Ti still falling 4% behind the 3090 Ti at native resolution, and the RTX 4080 delivered 26% better performance overall. The 4070 Ti meanwhile led the 3080 Ti by 9%, 3080 by 21%, and the 3070 Ti by 62%. It was also 21% faster than the 7900 XT and 5% faster than the 7900 XTX — and again, that's without factoring in DLSS 2 or DLSS 3.

With DLSS Quality mode (Balanced in MC), the RTX 4070 Ti performance improves by 64%. That pushes performance from just over 60 fps on average to more than 100 fps. DLSS 3 Frame Generation tacks on another 49% in CP77 and 43% in SMMM, or about more than double what you get at native without any form of DLSS. 

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

We also tested "pure" DXR performance using the 3DMark DXR Feature Test, which runs at 1440p. We set the number of rays to the maximum of 20 per pixel, and compared performance with the other GPUs. Here the 4070 Ti came in third place, outperforming the RTX 3090 Ti by 12%. It's not a huge difference, but it does show that in cases where memory capacity and bandwidth are lesser factors, the 4070 Ti can beat the previous generation's top GPU. 

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • oofdragon
    The price is Not almost palatable, stop trying to sell this nonsense
    Reply
  • sabicao
    Admin said:
    Our GeForce RTX 4070 Ti testing reveals good performance and efficiency, but this is a large jump in generational pricing that will displease many gamers. It's barely faster than the previous generation RTX 3080 Ti and 3080 12GB, at a relatively similar price, with DLSS 3 being the potential grace.

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU : Read more

    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    oofdragon said:
    The price is Not almost palatable, stop trying to sell this nonsense
    Do you not know what "almost" means? And while some would take "palatable" to mean really tasty, that's not the way I normally use it. I use it more as "acceptable but not awesome." I wouldn't call an excellent dinner "palatable," I'd say it was delicious or some other word that means I really like it. Taco Bell is palatable, for example. So is Wendy's. But neither is great, just like an $800 replacement that's only moderately faster than the outgoing $800 cards.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    sabicao said:
    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.
    They're only "wrong" when everyone refuses to pay them. Unfortunately, we're being shown time and time again that there are apparently enough people willing to spend $800 for this level of performance that we'll continue to see them. As stated in the conclusion, if Nvidia had tried to sell this as a $600 card, or a $500 card, and then scalpers just snapped them all up and asked for $800 or more, we'd be right back where we started. Except then we'd have scalpers contributing nothing and taking a chunk of the profits.

    So yeah, don't buy a $800 card if you don't want to spend that much. Wait for prices to come down, or go with a cheaper and slower alternative. But if others keep paying a lot more than you're willing to pay, nothing is going to change.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Cheaper than expected…
    Lets see what real price end up after two to tree weeks… when those few ”cheap” MSRP GPUs run out… $1200?
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Hmmm, appreciate the review Jared, yet I gotta object to your "almost" endearing tone and conclusion. Also, you insist that this is an $800 card, yet the TUF gaming you reviewed here reportedly costs $850.
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    "Portal RTX at 24 fps on a 4090 gets 42 fps with Frame Generation enabled, but without upscaling, but it still feels like 24 fps. That's because the user input is still running at 24 fps."

    Wow really? Never knew this, interesting tidbit.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Thanks for the review!

    This is a big can of "meh; pass". Much like with the 7900XT. Ironically, the 7900XTX made the 4080-16GB look better and now nVidia returning the hand, making the 7900XT less stupid. They're still both in stupid territory, though.

    I mostly agree with everything, so nothing more to add, really. Maybe just the mention this card won't have an FE (as I've read and heard), so the first batch of $800 cards will last whatever the AIBs want them to be on shelves. Which, I'm sure, won't be long. This card will be over $850 for sure.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    sabicao said:
    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.

    He did say it. In the title.

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU
    Open up your wallet and say ouch

    He said it professionally, many times through out his review. I am going to assume you didn't read the whole review, so maybe you should, its there.

    These cards are palatable, because most plebs pay for them. As long as everyone keeps paying these prices, Nvidia is going to keep charging them. If you all want gpu prices lower, skip a gen or two, speak with your money, not your mouth.
    Reply
  • DavidLejdar
    Seems a bit weak-ish for 4K gaming, and there are cheaper GPUs, which work fine for 1440p gaming. It still has quite some performance, and the 4K FPS are not bad as such. The numbers just don't convince me that it wouldn't drop below 60 (real) FPS at 4K with the next round of game releases, so I wouldn't pick it up for 4K at that price.

    And scalpers sure may be an issue, but if the RTX 4070 Ti is meant as "the entry-level GPU for 4K gaming, or for top 1440p gaming", then it wouldn't necessarily be a miscalculation if it would be produced in higher numbers, so that scalpers would have a garage full of them while they still would be in-stock at the retailers.
    Reply