Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU

Open up your wallet and say ouch

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Design, Featuring Asus TUF Gaming OC 

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Unlike the 4080 and 4090 Founders Editions, Nvidia isn't making its own RTX 4070 Ti. That's an interesting development, as Nvidia has had Founders Editions of everything from GTX 1060 6GB through 1080 Ti (five models), RTX 2060 through 2080 Ti (seven models), and RTX 3060 Ti through 3090 (six models). Now, with the 40-series, it seems Nvidia may constrain its own-brand cards to just the two top solutions — and probably an eventual RTX 4090 Ti and 4080 Ti later this year. That or we'll get an RTX 4070 Founders Edition, which would just feel weird after skipping the 4070 Ti.

It's not necessarily a bad thing for Nvidia to only do Founders Editions on the upper echelon of GPUs, and perhaps EVGA's decision to exit the graphics card market has something to do with it. At the same time, we do prefer to do our initial reviews of any new GPU using a reference design where possible, which we can't do with the 4070 Ti.

Nvidia instead sent us an Asus RTX 4070 Ti TUF Gaming OC. This should be a fair representation of how the basic factory overclocked cards perform, but it will also be slightly faster than the slowest designs so we're no longer looking at the minimum level of expected performance. The Asus card isn't small by any stretch, though it's at least a bit smaller than the 4080 and 4090 Founders Editions. It measures 298 x 138 x 62 mm (from the bottom of the PCIe connector to the highest point on the card) and weighs 1342g.

That makes this a full triple-slot graphics card by any normal definition, as a PCI slot is about 21mm wide, but Asus' own specs list this as a 3.25-slot design. The extra 0.25 slots is presumably to give the fans some room to breathe, so you'll want a case with plenty of space for this particular model. Asus also conveniently includes a little support stand to help prevent GPU sag — just don't forget about it and tip your case on the side, though the magnet on the bottom might be enough to keep it in place.

Asus uses the now-typical triple fan cooling setup that we see in most high-end custom cards, with three 89mm diameter fans that include an integrated rim. Considering we've seen similar designs used on cards rated for far higher power consumption, the Asus card should do just fine and generally runs cool and quiet.

As we've also seen with other recent Asus cards, there are dual HDMI 2.1 outputs plus three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. While DP1.4a is technically worse than HDMI 2.1 and AMD's DP2.1 (54 Gbps), we now have a Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 that supports up to 4K and 240 Hz, and it also uses Display Stream Compression (DSC). We tested it out with the Asus card and it worked great, with both HDMI and DisplayPort connections. Having now also tried DSC in person, I'm also a lot more comfortable with the "visually lossless" claims — it's certainly better than 4:2:2 chroma subsampling, though even that generally looks fine at 4K with modern GPUs (not so much on an older GTX 10-series card, though).

One interesting twist is that all of the Nvidia RTX 40-series cards seem to be using a single 16-pin power connector, whether it's really needed or not. With a 4090 potentially consuming over 500W with overclocking, we could at least somewhat understand the desire to simplify connectivity, though the melting adapters didn't work out so well (even if it appears to have been at least partially user error). With a 285W TBP (total board power), Asus had no need to use a 16-pin adapter, but it did so anyway, with a two 8-pin to single 16-pin adapter included for those who don't have a newer ATX 3.0 power supply. We can't help but think the cost of the adapter has to be higher than the cost of putting two 8-pin connectors directly on the card, something we've seen for at least seven years, but Nvidia apparently doesn't want to walk back on using 16-pin connectors with the 40-series — I can't wait for RTX 4050 cards with a single 8-pin to 16-pin connector! [Note to Nvidia: That's sarcasm.]

Since the Asus card will serve as our "reference" RTX 4070 Ti for the foreseeable future, we're going to skip disassembly and teardown — we need to guarantee the card keeps working properly, and ideally not change any of the cooling or other factors. What we do know of the internals is that there are only six GDDR6X chips, 2GB each, which should be relatively easy to cool in comparison to the GPU. Also, there are GPS coordinates on the card that presumably match up with Asus' Taiwan headquarters — or something. Feel free to research that further and go visit if you happen to be in the area. 

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • oofdragon
    The price is Not almost palatable, stop trying to sell this nonsense
    Reply
  • sabicao
    Admin said:
    Our GeForce RTX 4070 Ti testing reveals good performance and efficiency, but this is a large jump in generational pricing that will displease many gamers. It's barely faster than the previous generation RTX 3080 Ti and 3080 12GB, at a relatively similar price, with DLSS 3 being the potential grace.

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU : Read more

    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    oofdragon said:
    The price is Not almost palatable, stop trying to sell this nonsense
    Do you not know what "almost" means? And while some would take "palatable" to mean really tasty, that's not the way I normally use it. I use it more as "acceptable but not awesome." I wouldn't call an excellent dinner "palatable," I'd say it was delicious or some other word that means I really like it. Taco Bell is palatable, for example. So is Wendy's. But neither is great, just like an $800 replacement that's only moderately faster than the outgoing $800 cards.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    sabicao said:
    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.
    They're only "wrong" when everyone refuses to pay them. Unfortunately, we're being shown time and time again that there are apparently enough people willing to spend $800 for this level of performance that we'll continue to see them. As stated in the conclusion, if Nvidia had tried to sell this as a $600 card, or a $500 card, and then scalpers just snapped them all up and asked for $800 or more, we'd be right back where we started. Except then we'd have scalpers contributing nothing and taking a chunk of the profits.

    So yeah, don't buy a $800 card if you don't want to spend that much. Wait for prices to come down, or go with a cheaper and slower alternative. But if others keep paying a lot more than you're willing to pay, nothing is going to change.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Cheaper than expected…
    Lets see what real price end up after two to tree weeks… when those few ”cheap” MSRP GPUs run out… $1200?
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Hmmm, appreciate the review Jared, yet I gotta object to your "almost" endearing tone and conclusion. Also, you insist that this is an $800 card, yet the TUF gaming you reviewed here reportedly costs $850.
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    "Portal RTX at 24 fps on a 4090 gets 42 fps with Frame Generation enabled, but without upscaling, but it still feels like 24 fps. That's because the user input is still running at 24 fps."

    Wow really? Never knew this, interesting tidbit.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Thanks for the review!

    This is a big can of "meh; pass". Much like with the 7900XT. Ironically, the 7900XTX made the 4080-16GB look better and now nVidia returning the hand, making the 7900XT less stupid. They're still both in stupid territory, though.

    I mostly agree with everything, so nothing more to add, really. Maybe just the mention this card won't have an FE (as I've read and heard), so the first batch of $800 cards will last whatever the AIBs want them to be on shelves. Which, I'm sure, won't be long. This card will be over $850 for sure.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    sabicao said:
    I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.

    He did say it. In the title.

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU
    Open up your wallet and say ouch

    He said it professionally, many times through out his review. I am going to assume you didn't read the whole review, so maybe you should, its there.

    These cards are palatable, because most plebs pay for them. As long as everyone keeps paying these prices, Nvidia is going to keep charging them. If you all want gpu prices lower, skip a gen or two, speak with your money, not your mouth.
    Reply
  • DavidLejdar
    Seems a bit weak-ish for 4K gaming, and there are cheaper GPUs, which work fine for 1440p gaming. It still has quite some performance, and the 4K FPS are not bad as such. The numbers just don't convince me that it wouldn't drop below 60 (real) FPS at 4K with the next round of game releases, so I wouldn't pick it up for 4K at that price.

    And scalpers sure may be an issue, but if the RTX 4070 Ti is meant as "the entry-level GPU for 4K gaming, or for top 1440p gaming", then it wouldn't necessarily be a miscalculation if it would be produced in higher numbers, so that scalpers would have a garage full of them while they still would be in-stock at the retailers.
    Reply