Is On-The-Go Storage Ready for Primetime?

Test Setup

Swipe to scroll horizontally
System Hardware
Processor(s) 2x Intel Xeon Processor (Nocona core)3.6 GHz, FSB800, 1 MB L2 Cache
Platform Asus NCL-DS (Socket 604)Intel E7520 Chipset, BIOS 1005
RAM Corsair CM72DD512AR-400 (DDR2-400 ECC, reg.)2x 512 MB, CL3-3-3-10 Timings
System Hard Drive Western Digital Caviar WD1200JB120 GB, 7,200 rpm, 8 MB Cache, UltraATA/100
Test Hard Drive I Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 ST3500641500 GB, 7,200 rpm, 16 MB Cache, SATA/300
Mass Storage Controller(s) Intel 82801EB UltraATA/100 Controller (ICH5)Silicon Image SATALink SiL3512Driver 1.2.0.57Promise FastTrak TX4310Driver 2.06.1.310Promise SATA 300TX4Driver 1.0.0.33
Networking Broadcom BCM5721 On-Board Gigabit Ethernet NIC
Graphics Card On-Board GraphicsATI RageXL, 8 MB
System Hardware
Performance Measurements c’t h2benchw 3.6
PCMark05 V1.01
I/O Performance IOMeter 2003.05.10Fileserver-BenchmarkWebserver-BenchmarkDatabase-BenchmarkWorkstation-Benchmark
System Software & Drivers
OS Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition,Service Pack 1
Platform Driver Intel Chipset Installation Utility 7.0.0.1025
Graphics Driver Default Windows Graphics Driver

Startech And Thecus’ Mid-Tier Offerings

We tested the Infosafe with a Samsung HM160JI 2.5" SATA hard disk. Access times for the Infosafe fell in the middle of the usual range : 18.5 ms average read time, and median transfer rates of 27.6 MB/s for read and 22.7 for write. None of these numbers elicits too much enthusiasm.

Nor does the Thecus YES nano N1050 set any speed records, either. Its average access time was 18.2 ms, and its media transfer rates were 28.7 MB/s for read, and 22.8 MB/s for write. Here, we used a Samsung HM160JC 2.5" hard disk for our tests.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

All these results fall within the normal range for USB 2.0 performance.