Zotac Premium Edition SSD Review

Conclusion

In the last year, we've given Phison's S10 controller a lot of attention. Our interest always involved the processor's potential, rather than how it was actually performing at the time. After all, when you lay out its specifications, features and advanced technologies, there's a lot to get excited about.

Optimism often leads to a mismanagement of expectations, and for a period of time we started to doubt the PS3110-S10 would ever live up to its full potential. The latest 1.6 firmware increases performance and is certainly a step in the right direction. But we're still waiting for version 2.0. At least we have a target date for its release.

Focusing on the drive in front of us, Zotac started with a really good foundation for a gaming-oriented SSD. Its Premium Edition SSD delivers solid and consistent sequential read and write performance at a very low price. Competing SSDs ship with three-bit-per-cell (TLC) flash that cannot sustain high write speeds; Samsung's 850 EVO is the lone exception. Everything else quickly bleeds through its emulated SLC cache and falls back to native TLC performance, which is often slower than a mechanical hard disk. When you install a game, big blocks of data are being written sequentially. TLC just isn't ideal for that.

Further, games require a lot of capacity. Flash is still expensive compared to rotating media, but Zotac manages to get the price down on its Premium Edition SSDs. The 240GB model sells for just $65 and the 480GB version goes for $140. We would love to see a 1TB implementation for less than $300, though Zotac hasn't gone there yet. As we write this, the Premium Edition SSD is one of the least-expensive solid-state drives on Newegg at both capacities. Zotac is undercutting the other mainstream MLC-based drives, the entry-level TLC-based products and, most importantly, Samsung's 850 EVO.

That last part is huge. Zotac's Premium Edition is the first drive that slides in under the 850 EVO by enough of a margin to earn our recommendation. More thought goes into an endorsement than just pricing, too: Zotac also achieves comparable performance. But be aware that's where the similarities end. Zotac only equips you with a three-year warranty, and you don't get any cloning software to facilitate a smoother transition from your existing hard drive to the SSD. Samsung's package is a little more generous, justifying a bit of its premium.

MORE: Best SSDs For The Money
MORE: Latest Storage News

MORE: Storage in the Forums

Chris Ramseyer is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware, covering Storage. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.

Follow us on Facebook, Google+, RSS, Twitter and YouTube.

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
27 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • JQB45
    At that price its a great value. If only it had a 5 year warranty...
  • Onus
    If I needed another SSD, I'd definitely put this one on my short list. I have a question though, that pertains more to [SSD] testing in general than to this specific drive, but it certainly applies: will two identical SSDs (including same firmware, e.g. two units bought off the shelf at the same time) have identical performance? We know that the "silicon lottery" affects timing and overclocking limits on RAM; does it also play a role in SSD performance? I would think not, but if so, would love to know why, and how much. Thanks.
  • jtown82
    I am curious on the endurance specs of this SSD.
  • icepick314
    I don't know...

    Samsung Evo Pro 1TB with 10 year warranty is around $400-$450...

    I say splurge a little and get the capacity, performance, and 10 years of worry-free storage...
  • salgado18
    Quote:
    I don't know... Samsung Evo Pro 1TB with 10 year warranty is around $400-$450... I say splurge a little and get the capacity, performance, and 10 years of worry-free storage...

    I say if you want a drive for 10 years, wait for the new tech to arrive this year, a lot faster (over 3x) and with new connections (SATA is old already).
  • LordConrad
    Just out of curiosity, how do these drives compare to the Samsung 850 Pro on notebook battery life?
  • Onus
    Yes, please add power consumption. The Samsung drives are remarkable in how little idle power they use compared to competitors (I believe it is typically 30%).
  • g-unit1111
    37884 said:
    Just out of curiosity, how do these drives compare to the Samsung 850 Pro on notebook battery life?


    Yes. I would be curious about this as well. This looks like a fairly nice drive and $140 for 480GB and Toshiba NAND looks pretty solid and a decent competitor to Samsung.
  • shrapnel_indie
    Well, I wonder how TH would rank Toshiba's Q300 offerings against this and Samsung... from what I seen elsewhere their Q300 series puts up quite a fight with Samsung.
  • CRamseyer
    Thanks for all of the excellent questions.

    We tested the Q300 Pro (MLC version) and the review is in queue. We do not have the Q300 drive with TLC.

    On the notebook battery life front, we measured the 850 Pro 512GB at 657 minutes. There are so many good drives available now and such a wide divide between the high performance and low cost models that we charts the drives separate.

    There are size limits to for the performance charts. At some point I plan to list a couple of hundred drives in massive charts so everyone can see how they all stack up.

    The 850 Pro is the only model from Samsung with a 10 year warranty. The 850 EVO carries a 5-year warranty. The SanDisk Extreme PRO also carries 10 years of coverage.
  • jojesa
    Am I missing something?
    Quote:
    ...Zotac manages to undercut the value-oriented SSD market leader (Samsung's 850 EVO) by a large enough margin to stand out from a crowded field of low-cost SSDs...


    Zotac 480GB 3 year warranty $140 ($0.29/GB)
    Samsung 850 EVO 500GB 5 year warranty $151 ($0.30/GB)

    That's considered a large enough margin...?
  • shrapnel_indie
    65725 said:
    Am I missing something?
    Quote:
    ...Zotac manages to undercut the value-oriented SSD market leader (Samsung's 850 EVO) by a large enough margin to stand out from a crowded field of low-cost SSDs...
    Zotac 480GB 3 year warranty $140 ($0.29/GB) Samsung 850 EVO 500GB 5 year warranty $151 ($0.30/GB) That's considered a large enough margin...?


    Hmmm... prices as I look at it here from PCPP aren't favorable for the Zotac at all.

    PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

    Storage: Toshiba Q300 480GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($139.99 @ Amazon)
    Storage: Zotac Premium Edition 480GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($165.99 @ Amazon)
    Storage: Samsung 850 EVO-Series 500GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($154.78 @ OutletPC)
    Storage: Toshiba Q300 Pro 512GB 2.5" Solid State Drive ($199.99 @ Amazon)
    Generated by PCPartPicker 2016-01-29 16:07 EST-0500
  • mapesdhs
    Can't believe I have to mention this again...

    Please stop using bar graphs with non-zero origins. It completely defeats the visual purpose of a bar graph, as the immediate impact is totally misleading (sequential read).
  • George Phillips
    At this level of performance and features MLC technology, these are very good drives comparing to Crucial BX200 and Samsung 850 Evo. I will buy the 480GB version if it drops to $100.
  • CRamseyer
    117741 said:
    Can't believe I have to mention this again... Please stop using bar graphs with non-zero origins. It completely defeats the visual purpose of a bar graph, as the immediate impact is totally misleading (sequential read).


    There were two charts. Excel just randomly chooses to change them from 0 to whatever it wants. I didn't catch it this time. It doesn't happen all of the time, it's actually fairly rare. It may happen once out of every 10 products and it's always just one or two charts but never the same ones.
  • CRamseyer
    65725 said:
    Am I missing something?
    Quote:
    ...Zotac manages to undercut the value-oriented SSD market leader (Samsung's 850 EVO) by a large enough margin to stand out from a crowded field of low-cost SSDs...
    Zotac 480GB 3 year warranty $140 ($0.29/GB) Samsung 850 EVO 500GB 5 year warranty $151 ($0.30/GB) That's considered a large enough margin...?


    At the time of writing the 850 EVO 500GB cost more than it does now.
  • kalmquist
    Quote:
    I have a question though, that pertains more to [SSD] testing in general than to this specific drive, but it certainly applies: will two identical SSDs (including same firmware, e.g. two units bought off the shelf at the same time) have identical performance? We know that the "silicon lottery" affects timing and overclocking limits on RAM; does it also play a role in SSD performance? I would think not, but if so, would love to know why, and how much. Thanks.


    I would guess that the performance would typically be identical, but differences could develop over time due to the flash memory deteriorating at different rates. Reading can be slower if more extensive error correction is required. I think that writing flash can also get slower as the flash deteriorates, because writing is an iterative process where the the controller adjusts the cell charge and then verifies that the charge is correct, making additional adjustments if it is not.

    Eventually pages can deteriorate to the point where they have to be taken out of service, decreasing the amount of spare memory available, which can slow down writing because a smaller spare area makes garbage collection more challenging.
  • Xizel14
    'Still awaiting the 2.0 firmware'

    Does this mean that I can buy this drive now and expect a performance increase when the new firmware arrives?
  • CRamseyer
    Zotac will have to releases it as an update if/when available. The company doesn't have a long history in the SSD market so we don't have a historic record to go on. Some companies are very fast to validate new firmware and others take a bit longer.
  • DotNetMaster777
    it is quite good price for those disks.