US gov't warned Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Tim Cook, and Lisa Su that China could invade Taiwan by 2027 — Apple CEO reportedly said he sleeps 'with one eye open'
A new report reveals that tech CEOs were cautioned in 2023, yet haven't really taken action on the info.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
A new investigative report from The New York Times reveals that, in July 2023, senior US intelligence officials privately briefed some of the tech industry's most powerful executives on classified assessments regarding China and Taiwan. Among those in attendance were reportedly Apple CEO Tim Cook, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, AMD CEO Lisa Su, and Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon.
According to the report, CIA Director William J. Burns and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told executives that China's military buildup suggested Beijing could be prepared to move on Taiwan by 2027. US defense officials have publicly referenced that timeline before, but this briefing appears to have conveyed the most current classified intelligence directly to corporate leadership. For companies whose business models depend on predictable access to advanced silicon, the timeline matters. In 2021, "by 2027" sounded like a talking point from congressional testimony.
The expectation that China may be ready to invade or blockade Taiwan within the decade is not new in policy circles. What is news is the degree to which the US government explicitly framed that risk for the companies most exposed to it. Taiwan produces roughly 90 percent of the world's most advanced semiconductors, primarily through Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC. A blockade or invasion would immediately disrupt global chip supply chains, with cascading effects across consumer electronics, AI infrastructure, automotive manufacturing, and defense systems.
The backdrop to these briefings was the Biden administration's push to reshore semiconductor manufacturing through the CHIPS Act, followed by the Trump administration's more aggressive use of tariffs (or attempted use, anyway) to force procurement shifts. Intelligence warnings were part of a broader effort to convince companies that geopolitical risk was no longer theoretical.
The investigation highlights internal government frustration that market incentives alone have not been enough to significantly reduce reliance on Taiwan. Building leading-edge capacity in the US has proven expensive and slow. Even where new fabrication plants are coming online in Arizona and Texas, advanced packaging capabilities remain concentrated in Taiwan, meaning some US-made chips still require critical finishing steps overseas.
The report states that after the July 2023 briefing, Cook told officials he sleeps "with one eye open." Despite that sentiment, Apple and other major US tech firms did not substantially accelerate new domestic chip purchase commitments in the immediate aftermath, according to people familiar with the matter. In fact, both Intel and Samsung lost out on CHIPS grants because they were unable to secure customers for domestic chip fabrication.
For the tech sector, the core issue is simple but stark. If Beijing moves on Taiwan and successfully interrupts semiconductor exports, the immediate economic impact would likely dwarf the 2008 financial crisis. A 2022 industry-commissioned study cited in the report projected an 11 percent drop in US GDP under a severe Taiwan disruption scenario. That number will have only gone up in the interim, as mostly imaginary AI spending has propped up the US GDP considerably in the last four years.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
The broader geopolitical tension has been well understood for years; what this reporting adds is confirmation that US intelligence agencies have privately communicated a concrete planning window to the executives who run the companies most exposed to that risk. Despite this, the gap between awareness and structural supply chain change remains significant, and the seemingly cavalier attitude of US tech firms to the risk could have major consequences in the tragic event of war in the Taiwan Strait.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Zak is a freelance contributor to Tom's Hardware with decades of PC benchmarking experience who has also written for HotHardware and The Tech Report. A modern-day Renaissance man, he may not be an expert on anything, but he knows just a little about nearly everything.
-
PEnns Maybe because they remember the warnings about the "lethal Iraqi WMDs" in the 1990s....from the same US agencies.Reply -
Shadowself Why is this considered news?Reply
Xi made speech, which was made public, back in 2023 (early 2023?) in which he told the world that it was his intent to make the PRC's military so capable by the end of 2027 that the PRC could take Taiwan by force even if the U.S. military got directly involved in defending Taiwan. Xi wanted to be able to take over 100% of Taiwan at any time he wanted to after the end of 2027.
Nothing has changed since that time. Yes, the modernization and expansion of the PRC military and intelligence communities are moving ahead more slowly than Xi would like, but they are still moving forward with the same goal just maybe eventually a year or two behind the original schedule.
Anyone who says this is news is just not paying attention. -
Shadowself Reply
China has a mandatory expansion into their "commercial" fleet. They have exercised this multiple times over the past few years. With that "ready reserve fleet" they can mobilize as much as they need.SSGBryan said:Repeat after me:
China doesn't have the sealift capacity to invade Taiwan. -
Findecanor Reply
Oh really? There have been many reports of Chinese shipyards building landing crafts.SSGBryan said:Repeat after me:
China doesn't have the sealift capacity to invade Taiwan.
China has also become officially more hostile against Japan, warning Chinese people from visiting Japan which has already led to a significant drop in Chinese visitors there. -
Notton I keep hearing "China's ready to invade Taiwan", right along side "China's about to implode/bankrupt/kaput/done for/etc" for over a decade at this point, and neither has happened.Reply -
80251 Reply
If you're using civilian ships to transport troops and equipment you better have complete aerial supremacy -- otherwise those ships will just be targets, not only for Taiwan's air force but anti-ship missiles.Shadowself said:China has a mandatory expansion into their "commercial" fleet. They have exercised this multiple times over the past few years. With that "ready reserve fleet" they can mobilize as much as they need.
I've read Taiwan is quite the porcupine and that even if the PRC succeeds the losses in military equipment will be catastrophic (especially if the US comes to their assistance). -
endocine id like to say stock up tech, but AI inflation has already made things cost prohibitive, it does mean though that there will be at least a decade of no to extremely limited availability, and severely curtailed development. That will be the least of anyone's worries though. No new smart phones, tablets, computers, and anything that uses tech. It will be like taking a step back in time to when we didnt have AI and Wifi in our household appliances, cars, and everything else. Maybe that will be a good thing though in some ways, getting a break from all this madnessReply