U.S. gov't seizes $7.4 billion semiconductor research fund created under Biden admin, calling it 'illegal' — Lutnick says fund 'served as a semiconductor slush fund that did nothing but line the pockets of Biden loyalists with American tax dollars'

Howard Lutnick giving the double finger gun gesture.
(Image credit: Getty/Bloomberg)

The U.S. Commerce Department has seized control of a $7.4 billion semiconductor research fund from the National Center for the Advancement of Semiconductor Technology (NATCAST), a private non-profit set up during the Biden administration, as per Reuters. Describing it as a "slushfund," for ex-Biden admin officials, the Commerce Department promised greater oversight and accountability for where the funds are being spent, but didn't provide any further detail.

One of the defining investments of the Biden administration was the CHIPS Act, which authorized close to $300 billion in investments to encourage the design, development, and manufacturing of cutting-edge semiconductors in the United States. The creation of NATCAST was a part of that, with $11 billion allocated for it to establish a range of research centers around chip design.

“From the very beginning NATCAST served as a semiconductor slush fund that did nothing but line the pockets of Biden loyalists with American tax dollars,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in the statement. He's recently heralded a serious change in the way the U.S. handles its technology investments and grants.

Jon Martindale
Freelance Writer

Jon Martindale is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. For the past 20 years, he's been writing about PC components, emerging technologies, and the latest software advances. His deep and broad journalistic experience gives him unique insights into the most exciting technology trends of today and tomorrow.

  • hotaru251
    calls it illegal yet is there any proof apart from "trust me bro" ?
    Regardless of who claims something accusations w/o any proof shouldnt be allowed.

    really gonna suck w/ 3 and 1/3rd more yrs of a circus of politics ;/
    Reply
  • Gururu
    hotaru251 said:
    calls it illegal yet is there any proof apart from "trust me bro" ?
    Regardless of who claims something accusations w/o any proof shouldnt be allowed.

    really gonna suck w/ 3 and 1/3rd more yrs of a circus of politics ;/
    They don't need proof. They will send you to Uganda if you complain.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    This seems like something that should have been investigated before reporting on. I don't necessarily blame Tom's for this either as I read the Reuters piece and it's utterly devoid of any actual investigation.

    As it stands though it just reads like a press release. Putting unsubstantiated political claims in an article like this serves to benefit those in power not the reader.
    Reply