Intel Unveils 8th-Generation U-Series Processors, Kaby Lake Refresh Debuts

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • ibjeepr
    "These are not the Coffee Lake processors you're looking for"
    Are we going to get an announcement on those later today?
    Reply
  • Zaporro
    omggggg who cares for laptops, i7-8700K please
    Reply
  • linuxgeex
    Paul did a really good job of spinning this deception by Intel in a positive light. These are simply not 8-th gen processors, at all. The performance gains are real but what this is about is AMD's recent releases of better-featured and better performance per dollar competition, and Intel choosing to relax its habitual stranglehold on features as a vehicle to drive up profits. That's good value for consumers, but the fact that Intel has made-believe to the public that this is a new generation with new architectural improvements is pretty saddening, regardless of whether they are providing good value with these new SKUs. Deception is never a good thing in marketing, and this is going to damage Intel's reputation among technologists.
    Reply
  • cryoburner
    Intel: "Hey guys, here's our new generation of CPUs, right on time in Q3! We call it Kaby Lake!"
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    So the 8000 series is going to be a mix of Kaby-R and Coffee Lake. Hello unnecessary confusion.
    Reply
  • Brian_R170
    I certainly welcome a mainstream quad-core laptop with a 15W TDP.
    Reply
  • mavikt
    Intel lost their cool badly upon the Ryzen arrival.
    And I've completely lost the grip of their generational codenames; when's there and architectural change and what does it consist of, what's the difference between the process nodes (14nm, 14nm+, 14nm++; less current leak? higher frequencies?).
    The tick-tock strategy was very clear to me, the new tick-tock-tack-tack-tack...; not so much.
    I'm glad I got my new rig last year, because making an informed buying decision other than 'the newer, the better' is getting real hard.
    I guess 'discombobulated' is the word, sounds like mumbo jumbo to me; Can't wait to see what it means!
    Reply
  • AnimeMania
    The tick-tock strategy has become the trick-talk strategy.
    Reply
  • MichaelElfial
    I have to agree with linuxgeex (no matter that I am not linux fan :) ), still what we see is probably indication of something more - Intel did not take AMD seriously way too long, they probably even waited months after the Ryzen release to get really scared. They are simply unable to make a big jump, which will give them enough security for the near future and they are doing what they can - playing with words included. Well, I am not convinced, on the contrary I am a bit worried for Intel in the long run and I (like most of you) appreciate the competition and the long term gifts it gives.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    20088379 said:
    I am a bit worried for Intel in the long run
    I wouldn't worry about Intel: it still has the better per-core performance in most software with plenty of cash reserves to tide itself over through the one or two chip generations it may need to re-adjust to Ryzen/TR/EPYC. If Intel really felt threatened, dropping CPU prices to halt AMD's market share gains would also be an option. The simple fact that Intel hasn't announced official price drops for its CPUs should be sufficient evidence that Intel doesn't feel immediately threatened yet beyond the rushed X299 launches to fill market gaps between its previous chips and AMD's new products and those aren't priced to compete on a dollar-for-dollar basis either.

    I'll worry about Intel if it still hasn't sorted itself out by mid-2019 where it'll have to compete against Ryzen 2 or possibly even 3.
    Reply