Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD Review: Big Performance in an Expensive Package

Seagate's latest drive is fast, but expensive.

Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Seagate’s FireCuda is the company’s fastest consumer SSD yet, but it doesn't offer as much value as other PCIe 4.0 SSDs.

Pros

  • +

    Solid performance

  • +

    Large write cache

  • +

    Power efficient

  • +

    Class-leading endurance

  • +

    Aesthetics

Cons

  • -

    Costly

  • -

    No heatsink

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Are you a prosumer on the hunt for the fastest SSD you can throw into your shiny new X570 system? With capacities up to 2TB, performance figures of up to 5.0/4.4 GBps of read/write throughput, and class-leading endurance ratings, Seagate’s new FireCuda 520 SSD should be near the top of your best ssds list.

New PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 NVMe SSDs have hit the market, but the Seagate FireCuda 520 is unique. While most SSDs feature some sort of additional heatsink to keep them cool, Seagate opted to not include one in the FireCuda 520’s design. Instead, the company banks on the fact that those looking to purchase the 520 will have a motherboard with a built-in M.2 heatsink.

TOPICS
Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • maestro0428
    Wow! Intel Optane still kicks some ass. Too bad is still overpriced too.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    "Phison’s stock 11.2 firmware"

    I own the Corsair MP600 drive and just updated to firmware 11.3 since this drive uses the same controller that firmware update maybe available aswell.

    I saw a slight boost in performance going from 11.1 to 11.3
    Reply
  • cryoburner
    Why is this drive being positioned as a "gaming" drive? Gaming systems don't typically need anywhere near that level of write endurance, and as far as game load times are concerned, this drive appears to perform more or less identical to the Intel 660p, a drive that costs half much for a given capacity.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    cryoburner said:
    Why is this drive being positioned as a "gaming" drive? Gaming systems don't typically need anywhere near that level of write endurance, and as far as game load times are concerned, this drive appears to perform more or less identical to the Intel 660p, a drive that costs half much for a given capacity.

    Its just marketing and those people tend not to be technical in nature. Slap gaming and RGB on anythings these days and the kids go nuts. However going SSD to NVME to PCIe 4 NVME will do next to nothing for game loading times because majority of games are not limited by I/O.

    As for the Intel 660p I would only choose that drive if you are on a limited budget. Its constantly at the bottom of the charts in this review and doesn't perform identical.

    Also the 660p uses QLC memory and this drive is using 3D TLC memory.


    Intel 660p 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4

    Memory

    QLC
    MTBF

    1,600,000 hours
    Max Sequential Read

    1,800MB/s
    Max Sequential Write

    1,800MB/s
    4K Random Read

    150K
    4K Random Write

    220K
    vs
    Seagate FireCuda 520 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4

    Memory

    3D TLC
    MTBF

    1,800,000 hours
    Max Sequential Read

    5,000 MB/s
    Max Sequential Write

    4,400 MB/s
    4K Random Read

    760K
    4K Random Write

    700 K
    Reply
  • nofanneeded
    Where is Samsung ? nothing yet?
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    I'm surprised there isn't a bigger gap between PCIe 3 and 4. Seeing that 970 Pro keep up with this Firecuda 520 and MP600 makes me think that the new gen 4 drives are not yet ready.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    Just early controllers the next batch using newer controllers will make the gap bigger.
    Reply
  • FBWSol
    500GB model Random Write IOPS should read 430.000 from their bumpf. Good work.
    Reply
  • trumanhw
    Admin said:
    Seagate's latest drive is fast, but expensive.

    Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD Review: Big Performance in an Expensive Package : Read more

    What...could...you...mean..?
    This review is incoherent at best, and must be false in others.

    QD1 Reads of 32KB files at a mere @ 1GB/s
    QD1 Reads of 64KB files at a mere @ 2GB/s

    If you give it 5 min it recovers 116GB of SLC
    If you give it 30 min it recovers 100GB of SLC


    So, at QD1
    and sub 32KB, the 905P ... might ... keep up..?

    NEVER is when it's ahead of the pack..?
    Just one of the colors covered by
    Samsung's consumer SSD And the crucial ...?
    Of course I believe that.

    Ignoring every 1GB/s I've always get (videos, using my 970 Evo+).
    That reads at 2GB/s like .. almost all the never. What a great review. ?

    I just hope everyone at Tom's keeps up the ... great work...?



    <Mod Edit - Removed off topic political text>
    Reply
  • FBWSol
    Disgusting. Keep it technical. Reported.
    Reply