GeForce GTX 480 And 470: From Fermi And GF100 To Actual Cards!

Nvidia Surround, Display Output, And Video

For those who’ve come to know and love AMD’s Eyefinity technology, Nvidia Surround is a bittersweet effort.

On one hand, the launch of GeForce GTX 480 means that Nvidia, like AMD, is pushing enough graphics horsepower from a single-GPU card that gaming at 2560x1600 isn’t necessarily taxing. Thus, the company is enabling (via software) the ability to span games across three displays, akin to Eyefinity.

The good news here is that Nvidia Surround supports bezel correction so that display bezels function more like window frames and less like jarring interruptions between continuous objects on-screen. It also works on older GeForce GTX 200-series graphics cards—so anyone rocking an SLI-based configuration of, say, GTX 280s could conceivably take advantage.

The bad news is that GF100- and GT200-based graphics cards are limited to two independent display outputs each. Attaching three monitors requires two cards. Comparatively, AMD’s support for three (and soon to be six) LCDs from a single board is vastly superior. Granted, the number of people with three-monitor desktops is small, but I’m included in that minority, so it’s all the more relevant to me.

To Nvidia’s credit, it plans to go one step further by enabling stereoscopic mode across three displays—and it’ll be the only game in town for anyone willing to throw down for three new 120 Hz LCDs, two graphics cards, and a $200 GeForce 3D Vision kit. Expensive? Yes. Potentially very cool? Also yes. 3D Vision Surround support is not yet part of the GeForce 197 driver. Rather, it’s expected to emerge in the 256.xx release sometime next month, and we’ll need to follow up once the feature can be tested.

Display Output

As you likely surmised from the preceding discussion, GF100 proffers two display pipelines, which are integrated into the GPU (unlike last-generation’s cards, which employed the NVIO companion chip). Both the GeForce GTX 480 and GeForce GTX 470 include two dual-link DVI outputs and a mini-HDMI connector, two of which can be used at any given time.

Three outputs available; use any two at a timeThree outputs available; use any two at a time

This connectivity suite isn’t particularly unexpected given then prevalence of DVI and the two-output ceiling common to every card outside of the Radeon HD 5000-series. AMD’s emphasis on DisplayPort is driven predominantly by the way Eyefinity enables its three-plus outputs.

Video And GF100 In Your HTPC

With everyone focusing on compute and gaming performance, there’s been little attention paid to GF100’s A/V capabilities. Naturally, nobody is going to want a GeForce GTX 480 or 470 in a home theater PC. But what about the derivative cards sure to follow?

GF100 employs the VP4 engine introduced back in October of last year with the mainstream GeForce GT 220 cards. VP4 adds support for MPEG-4 ASP (Advanced Simple Profile) acceleration, in addition to the MPEG-2, VC-1, and H.264 codecs offloaded by VP3.  

Moreover, it’s no longer necessary to use an S/PDIF cable to enable HDMI audio input. GF100 (like the GT 220 and GT 240) supports HDMI audio over PCI Express, enabling multi-channel LPCM. TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio cannot be bitstreamed, as they can with AMD’s Radeon HD 5000-series and Intel’s Clarkdale-based Core i3/Core i5 CPUs. You can’t get lossless audio out of a GF100-based card, but again, that probably won’t matter in any way until the Fermi architecture is miniaturized in a big way.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
444 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • restatement3dofted
    I have been waiting for this review since freaking January. Tom's Hardware, I love you.

    With official reviews available, the GTX 480 certainly doesn't seem like the rampaging ATI-killer they boasted it would be, especially six months after ATI started rolling out 5xxx cards. Now I suppose I'll just cross my fingers that this causes prices for the 5xxx cards to shift a bit (a guy can dream, can't he?), and wait to see what ATI rolls out next. Unless something drastic happens, I don't see myself choosing a GF100 card over an ATI alternative, at least not for this generation of GPUs.
    45
  • tipoo
    Completely unimpressed. 6 months late. Too expensive. Power hog. Performance not particularly impressive. The Radeon 5k series has been delivering a near identical experience for 6 months now, at a lower price.
    45
  • jennyh
    They held it back for 6 months, but it still can't play Crysis lol. :D
    39
  • Other Comments
  • restatement3dofted
    I have been waiting for this review since freaking January. Tom's Hardware, I love you.

    With official reviews available, the GTX 480 certainly doesn't seem like the rampaging ATI-killer they boasted it would be, especially six months after ATI started rolling out 5xxx cards. Now I suppose I'll just cross my fingers that this causes prices for the 5xxx cards to shift a bit (a guy can dream, can't he?), and wait to see what ATI rolls out next. Unless something drastic happens, I don't see myself choosing a GF100 card over an ATI alternative, at least not for this generation of GPUs.
    45
  • tipoo
    Completely unimpressed. 6 months late. Too expensive. Power hog. Performance not particularly impressive. The Radeon 5k series has been delivering a near identical experience for 6 months now, at a lower price.
    45
  • tpi2007
    hmmm.. so this is a paper launch... six months after and they do a paper launch on a friday evening, after the stock exchange has closed.. smart move by Nvidia, that way people will cool off during the weekend, but I think their stocks won't perform that brilliantly on monday...
    33
  • Anonymous
    not at all impressed
    28
  • Godhatesusall
    high power consumption, high prices along with a (small, all things considered) performance edge over ATI is all there is. Are 100$ more for a gtx 480 really worth 5-10% increase in performance?

    Though the big downside of fermi are temps. 97 is a very large(and totally unacceptable) temperature level. IMO fermi cards will start dying from thermal death some months from now.

    I just wanted competition,so that prices would be lower and we(the consumers) could get more bang for our buck. Surely fermi doesnt help alot in that direction(a modest 30$ cut for 5870 and 5850 from ATI and fermi wont stand a chance). It seems AMD/ATI clearly won this round
    34
  • Pei-chen
    Wow, it seems Nvidia actually went ahead and designed a DX11 card and found out how difficult it is to design. ATI/AMD just slapped a DX11 sticker on their DX10 card and sells it as DX11. In half a year HD 5000 will be so outdated that all it can play is DX10 games.
    -65
  • outlw6669
    Kinda impressed :/

    The minimum frame rates are quite nice at least...
    Lets talk again when a version with the full 512 SP is released.
    26
  • djtronika
    yawn
    13
  • Anonymous
    The way we're meant to be dismayed, gg infirmi
    22
  • randomizer
    I'll keep my GTX275.
    23
  • Anonymous
    Traditionally I have been a big nVidia loyalist. Why? Because I think they have better drivers. This however makes me question whether I will stick with them this time around. Its a huge letdown. The performance is not anywhere close to good enough. At this late point in the game ATi likely has something newer than the 5000 series close to launch. It will make people physically sick that they spent the big bucks on these nVidia cards if in 3 months or so there are faster cards from ATi.
    26
  • jennyh
    They held it back for 6 months, but it still can't play Crysis lol. :D
    39
  • Derbixrace
    im glad i bought the 5850, im not even a little impressed :/ ati won this round.
    34
  • Pei-chen
    Now I am really looking forward to DX11 gaming on GTX 400. ATI/AMD has a long way to go to get DX11 at acceptable performance.
    -41
  • Anonymous
    So... We better start talking about Fermi 2...
    24
  • Honis
    I think I'll stick with my 4870s...
    27
  • eodeo
    gotta love the competition. prices will surely go down and costumer will only benefit. sad that it took nvidia 6 months to get here though..
    3
  • tpi2007
    GTX 480: 10%-15% more performance than a 5870 for a power consumption akin to a 5970, at much higher temperatures, and for 100$ more. More than likely available in limited quantities in two weeks (let's see about that). I have a word for this: faillure.

    Oh, it seems that ATI already has a preview of Catalyst 10.3a, which add another few frames to the already very respcatable 10.3.

    I admit Tom's want to be polite, although I do have to say, from the reviews I've read so far, you seem to be the most objctive, so you deserve congratulations for that, but anyway, to me, it simply is not worth the money. Efficiency is not just a fashion word, it has real world implications, and Nvidia has a lot of homework to do on redesigning their chip.
    26
  • rage machine
    I am so disappointed. I have been using Nvidia since the 6000 series and, unfortunately for them, i will be purchasing an ATI card next. I have a GTX280 and there is really no performance gain big enough to justify the cost, power, and heat levels of the card. I have really gained some newfound respect for ATI though, I look forward to purchasing a card from them. I also believe that eyefinity is going to be the way to go.
    25
  • brett1042002
    Too little, too late.
    25