All about Motherboards
 Latest Motherboards articles
All Motherboards articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
action : Yoyo the Star Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
Ads

Sponsored links

ASRock P45R2000-WiFi

Previous Next
4:20 AM - 08/25/2008 by Thomas Soderstrom

Asia Rock (ASRock) targets the widest possible range of buyers by making its motherboards flexible and inexpensive—the P45R2000-WIFI is no exception. High-end features such as Dual Gigabyte plus wireless networking, RAID and AMD CrossFireX are added to mainstream mainstays such as digital audio connectors and FireWire, which could put superb value on its $140 online price, so long as everything else checks out.

ASRock sent us two motherboards, and this is the higher-market version with support for four DDR3 memory modules. ASRock isn’t leaving out very many people in its DDR3 support however, since the P45R2000-WiFi also includes two DDR2 slots. Buyers can’t use both memory types at once, but they can take some comfort in the ability to start cheap and upgrade later.

Ordinary ’sinks on the P45 Express northbridge and ICH10R southbridge lower build costs on components that likely don’t need anything more extravagant, while a four-phase voltage regulator and “paddle card” PCI Express selector switch help clarify the company’s budget aspirations. Proving that low-budget doesn’t need to indicate low quality, ASRock has fitted the P45R2000-WiFi with solid capacitors in all locations just like its more expensive competition.

A few sacrifices in convenience were needed to make a fully-featured and reliably-equipped motherboard inexpensive. The previously mentioned PCI Express mode selector card must be removed and re-positioned to change from single x16 mode to dual x8 mode PCI-Express x16 slots, but that’s just the beginning. The P45R2000-WiFi has also simplified some of its circuit pathways by moving a few of the connectors around, probably to reduce the number of circuit layers needed to support it wide array of features.

Placement of the 24-pin ATX/EPS main power connector on what we consider to be the wrong side of the board hinders proper cable management, and the eSATA ports on the back panel are simply pass-through connections. ASRock’s third-party Ultra ATA controller doesn’t support eSATA, and relying on the ICH10R for this function requires builders to run cables from the orange ports on the lower front corner to those on the upper rear corner. Besides creating cable clutter and reducing the number of internal drives supported, this design could reduce the maximum cable length supported by the rear ports when activated.

That’s not to say that the layout is totally without merit, as ASRock has provided all seven slot positions with useful functions and placed the Ultra ATA connector perfectly, at the P45R2000-WiFi’s upper front edge, for easy cable reach to legacy external drives, which are often found in the top bay of a case. Likewise, all six Serial ATA ports are located well out of the way of super-large graphics card ’sinks, and face outward rather than forward to allow placement in cases that have a drive bay immediately adjacent to the lower front edge. But those few bonuses are offset by a floppy header located under the lowest PCI Express slot and a front-panel audio connector in the bottom rear corner.

Many buyers will likely be swayed by the P45R2000-WiFi’s low price and excellent feature set, and those willing to make a few sacrifices in the area of cable management might have found themselves a bargain. Our tests should help to settle that debate.

Talkback
nickchalk 08/25/2008 11:19 AM
Hide
-1+

Where are the lower price P45 M/B ?
Asus P5Q pro is out for €110 and P5Q deluxe for €165 the price difference is about 70$ in Greece.

nihility 08/25/2008 1:41 PM
Hide
-5+

51 pages... You won't be upset if I read just the last 3 pages right?

Proximon 08/25/2008 2:18 PM
Hide
-1+

I suppose I can get some good from having read this. Did you get paid by the word? Maybe next time you could just put together a complete features chart so that we can have some convenient comparison? You know, so someone could go to a chart and see at a glance which boards had eSATA or firewire, or 8 USB.

JPForums 08/25/2008 2:31 PM
Hide
-5+

I'd rather have the overabundance of information than a lack of information. Presentation could use a little refining (I.E. comparison charts and the likes), but having the relevant information available at least is a good thing.

Anonymous 08/25/2008 2:55 PM
Hide
-1+

the introduction and specifics are nice, the comparision isn't. so, why don't you test with an 8500 or qx9650? 6850 are outdated... and a mobo handling a c2d doesn't mean it can handle a quad too, see P5K for example (it stinks when it comes to a q6600).

Crashman 08/25/2008 3:57 PM
Hide
-2+

proci :
the introduction and specifics are nice, the comparision isn't. so, why don't you test with an 8500 or qx9650? 6850 are outdated... and a mobo handling a c2d doesn't mean it can handle a quad too, see P5K for example (it stinks when it comes to a q6600).



Tom's Hardware wants the performance of current articles to reflect that of recent articles, so a "standard test platform" was chosen a while ago. It will get updated, but probably not before the new socket becomes widely available.

zenmaster 08/25/2008 5:23 PM
Hide
-3+

I would have liked to see something such as a P35 and an X48 as controls to help analyze the P45 Performance.

In otherwords, What is the P45 Gaining me over the older P35.
What would I gain by going to the X48. (Or Lose)

Crashman 08/25/2008 5:26 PM
Hide
-0+

zenmaster :
I would have liked to see something such as a P35 and an X48 as controls to help analyze the P45 Performance.In otherwords, What is the P45 Gaining me over the older P35.What would I gain by going to the X48. (Or Lose)


http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,1961.html

johnbilicki 08/25/2008 5:47 PM
Show
dobby 08/25/2008 5:59 PM
Hide
--1+

nickchalk :
Where are the lower price P45 M/B ?Asus P5Q pro is out for €110 and P5Q deluxe for €165 the price difference is about 70$ in Greece.



the p5q PRo is a p43 board, i should know i have one

dobby 08/25/2008 6:03 PM
Hide
-2+

johnbilicki :
The first 17 pages were filled with nothing but junk from ASUS. Do us a favor: don't even bother featuring or *MENTIONING* anything for any reason from a company that refuses to RMA 200-400 dollar brand new motherboards with anything other then used and usually broken junk. It destroyed my enthusiasm for the article.



if you RMA through your Vendor then you get a new one, which BTW most big vendors dont even check to see whether the part is broken.

also this article is good, way better than other recent articles especially mac orinated ones) what would be good though is a big summary table. also if the charts where updated.

Anonymous 08/25/2008 6:33 PM
Hide
-3+

"the p5q PRo is a p43 board, i should know i have one"

Funny, so do i and it's a p45.

Shadow703793 08/25/2008 6:48 PM
Hide
-0+

You forgot the EP45-DS3L. :( . Also why include cr@ppy brands (ie JetWay) any ways?

Crashman 08/25/2008 7:22 PM
Hide
-1+

johnbilicki :
The first 17 pages were filled with nothing but junk from ASUS. Do us a favor: don't even bother featuring or *MENTIONING* anything for any reason from a company that refuses to RMA 200-400 dollar brand new motherboards with anything other then used and usually broken junk. It destroyed my enthusiasm for the article.



Lies. The first two motherboards were from ASRock. The two companies are not the same, regardless of any ties they may have.

Crashman 08/25/2008 7:23 PM
Hide
-0+

nickchalk :
Where are the lower price P45 M/B ?Asus P5Q pro is out for €110 and P5Q deluxe for €165 the price difference is about 70$ in Greece.



There are low-priced P45's in there. The ECS only cost $110 US, which, given the weakness of US currency, is cheap.

Crashman 08/25/2008 7:25 PM
Hide
-1+

Shadow703793 :
You forgot the EP45-DS3L. . Also why include cr@ppy brands (ie JetWay) any ways?



NO motherboards were "Forgotten". Everyone got a chance to submit up to two motherboards, Gigabyte sent one. Jetway send one. Any of the other brands you disliked that were in the review, were there because everyone got an equal shot.

jerreece 08/25/2008 8:42 PM
Hide
-1+

johnbilicki :
The first 17 pages were filled with nothing but junk from ASUS. Do us a favor: don't even bother featuring or *MENTIONING* anything for any reason from a company that refuses to RMA 200-400 dollar brand new motherboards with anything other then used and usually broken junk. It destroyed my enthusiasm for the article.



At least you have a completely unbiased view of this...

I haven't read through the entire article. I actually skipped to the Conclusion first to see what board was rated as best (frankly that's important to me). Unfortunately, I see the second best, third best, but I'm having a hard time identifiying what Tom's calls the 1st best. It is not clearly stated.

cruiseoveride 08/25/2008 9:02 PM
Hide
-0+

that msi rocks ass. my next board.

johnbilicki 08/25/2008 9:21 PM
Hide
-2+

ASRock is a subsidiary of ASUS hence their RMA policies are likely to emulate that of ASUS.

Don't give me a thumbs down for sticking up for consumer rights. Thumb my comments down if you LIKE getting used and often broken replacements for your $200+ brand new though malfunctioning/broken boards.

Another problem ASUS seems to create is that it is usually the only company that builds motherboards for the GOOD AMD socket chipsets leaving us to wait for only a very select few (1~3 780A and nForce 4 true 16X SLI are examples) motherboard choices. This is *NO* different then how Dell used to use proprietary parts to lock you in. I LIKE choice and I expect ANY part regardless of it's price to have a NEW replacement for a RMA so long as it's covered under warranty.

So long as they play politics this way and try to sucker people I will speak up for the less informed enthusiasts. Let's not forget Gigabyte busting ASUS *AND* having a couple articles featured on this very site about it earlier this year.

My favorite is the Gigabyte board based on features. The article was interesting though what is with the inconsistencies? For example some motherboards have images of the IO panel while others do not. Still it was a good read.

jimmysmitty 08/25/2008 9:52 PM
Hide
-0+

^I will agree with you on that part but when it comes to good quality, performance and extra features I have never had a problem with Asus. I of course have been lucky enough to never have one break one me.


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links