$1,299 Asus OLED gaming monitors are arriving with cracked panels for many buyers — cut-down packaging with no protection for the panel gets the blame
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM Gen3 (PG32UCDM3) is one of the best gaming monitors and one of the priciest on the market. However, not even its top-tier specifications can save the premium OLED monitor from what appears to be a serious flaw: its packaging. Multiple frustrated users have taken to the OLED_Gaming subreddit to share photographs and stories about how their $1,299 monitors arrived with cracked screens, with the flimsy packaging blamed as the culprit.
Reddit user Rude-Employee7251 posted high-resolution photographs that leave no doubt about the extent of the damage. The lower right corner of their brand-new monitor was visibly cracked. In a frustrated account, the buyer described the packaging as “weirdly unprotected compared to other Asus releases.” Rude-Employee7251 is now navigating the tedious RMA process to obtain a replacement, a situation that should never have occurred with a premium product.
The Reddit post quickly gained traction, and other victims have chimed in to share similar experiences and echo concerns about the company’s declining packaging standards. Redditors siouxsian, advice_throwaway323, and Gillersan reported identical damage in the same spot as Rude-Employee7251. Although it's not a contest, Jonesy7mm's and WriterConfident3186's cases were the most catastrophic, with substantial fractures in the OLED panels.
Article continues below





One Redditor, winterbegins, conducted an in-depth analysis of Asus's packaging for the PG32UCDM3. There were several shortcomings. Drawing on their past monitor purchases and measurements, winterbegins reported that the cardboard box protecting the $1,299 monitor was significantly thinner than those of other monitors they owned. The PG32UCDM3’s box measured just 4.7mm thick, a full 1.5mm thinner than the packaging for the KTC M27P6 and LG G5, both of which came in at 6.2mm. It may sound like a minor difference, but every millimeter of protection counts. The PG32UCDM3 is a full 32-inch monitor, yet, as winterbegins observed, the box was “not much bigger than” the M27P6’s packaging, even though that model is five inches smaller.
However, the devil is in the details, and that’s exactly where things begin to unravel for the PG32UCDM3. The outer box may be just one contributor to the fragility of the packaging, but the choice of interior protection could be the more important factor. The PG32UCDM3 uses eggshell cardboard, a molded pulp material you might recognize from egg cartons. While eggshell cardboard is environmentally friendly and reasonably strong, it simply doesn’t compete with styrofoam when it comes to shock absorption. Imagine a delivery driver bumping or tossing your $1,299 gaming monitor onto your front porch. Styrofoam may cushion that blow, but eggshell cardboard is more likely to transmit the force to the delicate OLED panel.
Even more alarmingly, the eggshell cardboard wrapper’s design includes a big cutout in the lower half. The PG32UCDM3 sits face-first on the cardboard during shipping. There's no padding underneath. It could explain why some units are arriving with damage concentrated in the lower right section of the panel. There's nothing more than an eggshell cardboard and the outer box standing between the OLED panel and the perils of shipping.
While it's easy to point fingers at the retailer or the shipping company for damage during transit, Asus shares some responsibility. When you're paying $1,299 for a gaming monitor, the packaging should reflect the same level of quality. While these incidents may not yet be widespread, the growing number of similar complaints insinuates more than just a string of bad luck.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
-
Exploding PSU Read the reddit post, including the one detailing the box.Reply
That's ridiculous. I swear the packaging for a hypercheap $150 AUD LG office monitor that I had helped someone to bulk buy had more styrofoam and protection than that ASUS box. I heard boxes are made en-masse in defined sizes, but can't ASUS pay a bit more for larger, safer, better boxes? -
Notton My guess is Asus decided to use eco-friendlier injection cardboard, but forgot to account for the change in shock absorbing performance. Either that, or they already ordered the external box, and changed to injection cardboard at the last minute when the box was designed for Styrofoam.Reply
In picture 3, you can clearly see the monitor cracked from the high spot on the cardboard, indicating it's too stiff to absorb impacts.
What they should probably do is switch to how they package laptops. Two injection cardboard blocks, one on each of the short ends, and two rolled pieces that fit in the gap made at the top and bottom on the long sides. It might need an extra screen protector to prevent scratches on the panel, since it'll be exposed, unlike a laptop. Or use a bigger box.
I'm sure they'll get it right next year.
Personally, I like styrofoam packaging for monitors, if I know I'm keeping the box just in case I need to ship it, but I prefer cardboard if I'm going to toss the box. -
spoidz I'll have to dig through the reddits but were all from the same vendors?Reply
I would have to drive 5 hours one way to my nearest Microcenter to buy/open in store just to check for damage.
I'm wondering if Amazon "hide what's inside" packaging would offer any better outcome? -
TechieTwo NOT to worry as the PC industry refers to these issues as a: "benefit" not a defect. :(Reply -
dwd999 Thanks so much for this, I really appreciate the warning. I was waiting to buy this for the HDR500 and Neo Proximity Sensor (don't care about refresh rates). Fortunately I decided to wait until later this month after I paid my taxes. But now I've given up on this and gone ahead and bought the Dell S3225QC QD-OLED since its only $500.Reply -
Fox Tread33 April 4, 2026 – (Dated for context and reference) I watch a number of popular YouTube Tech channels, and over the past couple of years. I've begun to have doubts about Asus products for various reasons. I would much prefer to purchase Tech items from other well known manufacturers. This is just another reason for me to avoid Asus products.Reply