Eurocom's Sky X9 Is More Desktop Than Laptop

27

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Michael Justin Allen Sexton is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers hardware component news, specializing in CPUs and motherboards.
  • flowingbass
    A GTX 980 is not a card for 4K gaming. If i were rich enough to buy this, id opt for the one with 1080p display. I prefer overkill rather than underpowered.
    Reply
  • Hando567
    A GTX 980 is not a card for 4K gaming. If i were rich enough to buy this, id opt for the one with 1080p display. I prefer overkill rather than underpowered.

    OR, get the 4K display, enjoy the nice high res while in the desktop environment, for media, etc. Then when you want to game, just tell the game to play at 1080P. Since 4k is exactly 4x1080P, it actually works out nicely with a block of 4 pixels representing a single pixel. No real interpolation to speak of.
    Reply
  • dstarr3
    A GTX 980 is not a card for 4K gaming. If i were rich enough to buy this, id opt for the one with 1080p display. I prefer overkill rather than underpowered.

    For that matter, there really aren't any cards for 4K gaming yet. Even the Titan X can't hold a steady 60fps in a lot of games. But, y'know, if you strap three or four Titan together, than you should be alright. And $4,000 poorer, if you factor in the cost of the PSU it takes to power all that.

    Suffice it to say, 4K is still a bit out of our reach at the moment.
    Reply
  • TechyInAZ
    Sweet rig! Not something that you would take into your local coffee shop, but a excellent desktop replacement.

    Why the 6700K? I would suggest putting the i7 mobile unlocked CPU in, it's still overclockable but with way less energy.
    Reply
  • IInuyasha74
    16766619 said:
    A GTX 980 is not a card for 4K gaming. If i were rich enough to buy this, id opt for the one with 1080p display. I prefer overkill rather than underpowered.

    For that matter, there really aren't any cards for 4K gaming yet. Even the Titan X can't hold a steady 60fps in a lot of games. But, y'know, if you strap three or four Titan together, than you should be alright. And $4,000 poorer, if you factor in the cost of the PSU it takes to power all that.

    Suffice it to say, 4K is still a bit out of our reach at the moment.

    Right, maybe it can't do 4K maxed out settings, but if you notice in our reviews of the GTX 980, most games were tested with maxed out or close to maxed out settings. Modifying the settings a little makes 4K gaming a very real possibility with this card.
    Reply
  • Aspiring techie
    Is there some contest on "How much hardware can you fit into a laptop? How many hundred people actually need this?
    Personally, I'll continue to use my laptop for when I'm on the move and my (much cheaper) desktop for gaming.
    Reply
  • braneman
    You see, I don't get this, 980m SLI will perform on par or better than a Titan x(depending on the game and its SLI profile). Why would you take the time and effort to put this system together when laptop hardware has reached the point where this is no longer necessary?
    If you don't believe me on this look it up, Far Cry 4, Assasins Creed Unity, Shadow of Mordor, Rise Son of Rome. All of those games 980m SLI performs better than a desktop 980 and in some cases better than a Titan X. No I'm serious twenty seconds of googling will give you a youtube video with direct, side by side, card to card comparisons.
    Reply
  • SteelCity1981
    bet it gets like 20 minutes of battery life tops. lol
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    $2,500, 10 lbs. This is not a laptop. It is a small, expensive, non portable, crippled, desktop.
    Reply
  • sullivang
    Hooray - a 17" 4K laptop at long last. THANKYOU Eurocom, although could you now just make one with the same display, but more mundane processing & graphics performance?
    Reply