LG Intros 2560x1440 Quad HD Smartphone Screen

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • Spooderman
    This seems somewhat pointless, since you're going to be holding it maybe about a foot away from your face at all times. Also, there's no way the chipsets in current phones will be able to perform at that resolution.
    Reply
  • wanderer11
    Why can't we get 2560x1440 desktop monitors smaller than 27" first?
    Reply
  • dragonsqrrl
    ... and we're stuck at 1920x1080 on most desktop monitors.
    Reply
  • Deus Gladiorum
    Honestly, who cares? In my experience, anything with a ppi between 100 - 150 is what you need to view something at the sharpest possible image from around a foot away. A ppi higher than that just results in wasted image quality. A ppi lower than that creates aliasing. So why the hell do you need anything that's over 500 ppi? You're not going to notice any difference from a foot away compared to the same size screen with a lower resolution.
    Reply
  • Deus Gladiorum
    Honestly, who cares? In my experience, anything with a ppi between 100 - 150 is what you need to view something at the sharpest possible image from around a foot away. A ppi higher than that just results in wasted image quality. A ppi lower than that creates aliasing. So why the hell do you need anything that's over 500 ppi? You're not going to notice any difference from a foot away compared to the same size screen with a lower resolution.
    Reply
  • murzar
    Stahp!
    Reply
  • soldier44
    11402765 said:
    Why can't we get 2560x1440 desktop monitors smaller than 27" first?


    Why. 30 inches at 2560 x 1600 is where its at.
    Reply
  • wanderer11
    Many people don't want a 27" monitor due to space constraints. It make certain games hard, such as CSGO, because I have to look away from the crosshairs to see the map. I also don't see how the extra row of 160 pixels is worth more than double the price (2560x1440 vs 2560x1600).
    Reply
  • sanctoon
    Two words: "Oculus Rift". This in a 7" configuration would be great for the 1st gen consumer model. If the price is right, considering they target a $300 MRSP
    Reply
  • Estix
    I'm waiting for the scaled-up 55" 25,600 x 14,400 :D
    Reply