Samsung 960 EVO, 960 Pro SSDs: The Full Product Details

After the first day of Samsung's SSD Global Summit, we finally have details about the new 960 series. The 960 series succeeds the 950 Pro with a two-prong strategy that satisfies the needs of both the professional and enthusiast markets. This series brings several advancements of more or less equal importance. Let's dive in.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • TechyInAZ
    Wow that's cool! M.2 high speed SSDs for only $129 for 256GB!
    Reply
  • heliomphalodon
    Compatible with Intel PCH RAID?
    Reply
  • Flying-Q
    Does the new Magician software address the current failure to recognise AHCI under RAID mode in EFI when SSDs are attached through SATA3?
    Reply
  • TechyInAZ
    18627839 said:
    Does the new Magician software address the current failure to recognise AHCI under RAID mode in EFI when SSDs are attached through SATA3?

    It must. I'm getting the same issue as well.
    Reply
  • Game256
    Nice. Samsung as always the best.

    960 EVO is even better than SM961 on paper. But I doubt it will be in real life. PM961 was also close to SM961 on paper, but in the real tests it was significantly worse.

    However, compared to SM961 for the same price, 960 EVO gets lots of additional pros: full warranty (the same 3 years that many retailers propose for SM961, but I think it will be much easier to get a replace from Samsung than from retailer), several thermal protection features (the most important thing, considering problems with overheating in SM961) and ready for consumer market, fully tested and balanced drive as a whole.

    Don't look at endurance. This is marketing bullshit. There are endurance tests of 850 EVO 250 Gb with 75 TB specified endurance. It easily passed more than 1200 Tb without any problems. And this is for TLC 3D V-NAND, not even MLC.

    It will be interesting to see the real tests of these drives. Did Samsung said when in October they're going to release them? Samsung 950 Pro was also announced on September 21 and was released on October 22 2016.
    Reply
  • babernet_1
    So the 500GB EVO has a smaller cache (12GB) than the 250GB EVO (13GB)?
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    I guess I'll have to write an article on endurance and what it actually means for end users. There are several tests where people wrote data to the drive for a very long time but that is not what endurance is about. For consumer SSDs, you have to be able to write the data and then power the device down for a year without losing your data. There is a specific JEDEC test for it. Due to time limitations, we do not test endurance.

    This is a good place to start and then if you want the JEDEC test and details are online. http://www.flashmemorysummit.com/English/Collaterals/Proceedings/2012/20120821_S102C_Cox.pdf
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    18627734 said:
    Compatible with Intel PCH RAID?

    I will let you know when I know. I still need to test the 600p for you as well.

    Sadly I couldn't ask all of the questions I wanted to at the event. There are around 100 members of the media there and eventually they take the mic away.
    Reply
  • nycalex
    finally an affordable 500gb nvme ssd that doesn't completelly suck.

    i was about to pull the trigger on intel 600, but now i'm going to wait for the 960 evo.

    i have used all pro drives thus far, 840 pro, 850 pro. Compared to a lowly budget crucial mx200 256gb ssd that costs way less, the real world speed differential WAS MINIMAL.

    now i only play games with my system, but so far i find all SSDs being almost similar in speed in real world applications such as games.
    Reply
  • argus2000
    I have read that these new SSDs are using 21 nanometers 3D V-Nand (48 layers). Is this true? Remember that previously Samsung was using 40nm 3D V-NAND (48 layers). This is a very important point. If true, this would mean that Samsung is now able to double capacity of the drives (or quadruplicate?) without increasing layer count (now 48). Please, ask Samsung about this important matter.
    Reply