Intel warns shareholders that the US government's 10% stake could hurt company's international sales
Money can hurt?

The U.S. government's acquisition of a 10% stake in Intel highlights strategic importance of the company and indicates how important it is to the U.S. government. But the government's new 10% ownership stake could cause problems for shareholders, employees, business partners, and the company's international sales, according to Intel's filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
One of Intel's biggest concerns is its dependence on foreign markets: In fiscal 2024, the company earned 76% of its $53.1 billion revenue outside the United States, a slight decline from the previous year, but still the lion's share. Sales to entities in China contributed 29% of Intel's total revenue, followed by the U.S. with 24.5%, Singapore with 19.2%, and Taiwan with 14.7%. Now that the U.S. government is Intel's largest shareholder, the chipmaker is directly linked to Trump's unpredictable trade and tariff policies, which could unsettle overseas customers and governments.
"Having the U.S. Government as a significant stockholder of the Company could subject the Company to additional regulations, obligations or restrictions, such as foreign subsidy laws or otherwise, in other countries," a statement by Intel reads.
In addition, the filing highlights the possibility of negative reactions from investors, suppliers, employees, and competitors. Intel went as far as to mention that lawsuits or political scrutiny could arise and warned that a change in the U.S. political leadership could alter or even undo parts of the agreement, which would cause further consequences.
"Among other things, there could be adverse reactions, immediately or over time, from investors, employees, customers, suppliers, other business or commercial partners, foreign governments or competitors," the statement says.
Intel acknowledged it had not finished evaluating the full financial, tax, and accounting effects of the deal, so further issues may arise.
The agreement between Intel and the U.S. government, signed on August 22, 2025, includes two funding steps. The first is roughly $5.7 billion, which represents accelerated payments from Intel's earlier arrangement with the Commerce Department under the CHIPS Act. The second is about $3.2 billion, which is linked to the CHIPS Act 'Secure Enclave' initiative for critical chips for aerospace and defense, and will be provided as conditions are met. Together, this funding package gives Intel immediate cash ($5.7 billion) and aligns future payments with government programs.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
In return, Intel will issue up to 433 million shares of stock to the U.S. government. Roughly 275 million shares will be given out once the first batch of money arrives, while around 159 million shares will sit in escrow and be released only as the Secure Enclave funds are transferred. However, if Intel does not receive all of the expected Secure Enclave money, half of the corresponding shares will still go to the government (no matter how many contracts are signed and for how much), while the other half will be cancelled.
But while Intel warns that the deal with the government may cause problems for Intel and its shareholders, U.S. President Donald Trump seems to be happy about the deal.
"I PAID ZERO FOR INTEL, IT IS WORTH APPROXIMATELY 11 BILLION DOLLARS. All goes to the USA," Donald Trump wrote in a social media post. "Why are "stupid" people unhappy with that? I will make deals like that for our Country all day long. I will also help those companies that make such lucrative deals with the United States States. I love seeing their stock price go up, making the USA RICHER, AND RICHER. More jobs for America!!! Who would not want to make deals like that?"
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
_Shatta_AD_ So now that Intel is officially a state sponsored company, there will be national security implications for countries/customers around the world. Intel will be hit really hard as countries start putting restrictions on where Intel chips can be installed and who can buy them. There’s very real potential for spying and backdoors built into the chip at the silicon level as mandated by government spy programs.Reply -
baboma >So now that Intel is officially a state sponsored company, there will be national security implications for countries/customers around the world.Reply
Yep. Just as US is banning Chinese companies over CCP ties, I can't imagine China not banning Intel products going forward.
PS: BTW, got a chuckle out of the blurb at the end of Shilov's piece. You go girl! :) -
Pemalite Definitely a lost sale with me.Reply
Good thing that AMD has the factually better product at the moment anyway, which makes the decision even easier. -
Alvar "Miles" Udell Intel warns that investing in Intel can cost you a lot of money and result in a golden parachute for the useless CEO.Reply -
baboma Intel's 2024 revenue from China is roughly 30%. It would be a huge loss.Reply
https://bullfincher.io/companies/intel-corporation/revenue-by-geography
>Intel warns that investing in Intel can cost you a lot of money and result in a golden parachute for the useless CEO.
Please can we stop with the idiotic Intel bashing? -
hotaru251 Sales to entities in China contributed 29% of Intel's total revenue
i mean..there is a reason nearly any business caves to Chinese wants. It is the largest consumer on the planet. Nobody wants to not be able to sell there as its a MASSIVE financial crippling.
to be fair Intel deserves all the bashing they get.baboma said:Please can we stop with the idiotic Intel bashing?
They let themselves get to this point.
I "do" want them to recover in time (like amd did) as its best for the market as a whole but they should start trimming from the top and not the bottom so the higher ups suffer. -
Dustyboy1492 Taiwan owns nearly 7% of TSMC and even has a seat on the board, how is this different?Reply -
baboma >Taiwan owns nearly 7% of TSMC and even has a seat on the board, how is this different?Reply
Taiwan isn't in a trade war with China. It's not a threat to China. It's not vying against China for AI supremacy. -
Dustyboy1492
They literally make the devices for an AI supremacy racebaboma said:>Taiwan owns nearly 7% of TSMC and even has a seat on the board, how is this different?
Taiwan isn't in a trade war with China. It's not a threat to China. It's not vying against China for AI supremacy.