Qualcomm scores big win over Arm in contentious lawsuit — U.S. court rejects Arm’s lawsuit, confirms Qualcomm’s can use Oryon cores acquired via Nuvia

Qualcomm
(Image credit: Qualcomm)

Qualcomm, along with its subsidiary Nuvia, have finally won the legal battle against Arm Holdings, which had accused the chip-maker of violating license agreements tied to its chip designs. A U.S. District Court judge in Delaware ruled that neither Qualcomm nor its subsidiary breached any of Arm’s architecture license agreement (ALA), dismissing the lone remaining claim in the case and also rejecting Arm's request for a new trial.

The latest ruling follows Qualcomm’s trial victory from December 2024, where the company was found innocent. However, at the time, the jury was unable to agree on whether Nuvia violated its licensing terms with Arm.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kunal Khullar
News Contributor

Kunal Khullar is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware.  He is a long time technology journalist and reviewer specializing in PC components and peripherals, and welcomes any and every question around building a PC.

  • Air2004
    "The latest ruling follows Qualcomm’s trial victory from December 2024, where the company was found innocent."


    You might wanna correct that sentence. Companies in a court of law are just like people when it comes to the verdict.... and in this case the proper term would be Not Guilty. The word "innocent" is never used when rendering a verdict.
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    Arm needs some better license agreement writers it seems.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    If these are civil trials nobody is ever guilty or innocent.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    On the face of it this lawsuit always seemed silly because of Qualcomm's existing licenses. Now that Arm has Ampere Computing and is directly competing with their own customers it sure lends credence to a lot of what Qualcomm was saying.

    Not that anyone really wins when big companies go after each other, but this one seemed as dangerous to the Arm industry as nvidia buying them did.
    Reply
  • Dav_Daddy
    Air2004 said:
    "The latest ruling follows Qualcomm’s trial victory from December 2024, where the company was found innocent."


    You might wanna correct that sentence. Companies in a court of law are just like people when it comes to the verdict.... and in this case the proper term would be Not Guilty. The word "innocent" is never used when rendering a verdict.
    This isn't a criminal matter so both are incorrect. This is a Tort claim which is an area of Civil law that deals with when one party causes injury or loss to another.

    As such the correct term would be liable or not liable.
    Reply
  • Pemalite
    Qualcomm should just buy ARM outright. They ironically probably make more money from ARM than ARM itself.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Pemalite said:
    Qualcomm should just buy ARM outright. They ironically probably make more money from ARM than ARM itself.
    When Nvidia tried that, they were denied the deal by at least two governments.
    Even though the heads have changed, I somehow doubt this would be allowed under Qualcomm.
    Reply
  • adamXpeter
    I love the smell of Huawei in the morning
    Reply
  • bit_user
    thestryker said:
    Now that Arm has Ampere Computing and is directly competing with their own customers it sure lends credence to a lot of what Qualcomm was saying.
    Given that they acquired Ampere after the verdict of the previous trial went in Qualcomm's favor, I think you can't say that the Ampere Computing acquisition wasn't more of a consequence of that result than supporting it.

    Basically, ARM needed to find a way to increase its revenues. One way was to extort ...er extract more from its licensees. Another was to go into more direct competition with them. When the former strategy failed, they had no other option but to adopt the latter.

    The reason why I think ARM got backed into a corner is that, just as semiconductor manufacturing is getting more expensive, so is the IP-side of the process (i.e. everything from design to layout, all of which ARM traditionally does). AFAIK, ARM might even make test chips, for in-silicon validation.

    thestryker said:
    Not that anyone really wins when big companies go after each other, but this one seemed as dangerous to the Arm industry as nvidia buying them did.
    Well, what ARM did was rather predatory. It looked as if they were trying to extract maximum value before the industry just switched to RISC-V. Either that, or a "hail mary" play to increase valuation and bolster their IPO, at the very least.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Pemalite said:
    Qualcomm should just buy ARM outright. They ironically probably make more money from ARM than ARM itself.
    This would probably get denied for similar reasons as Nvidia's attempt was.

    Speaking of which, now that ARM is going into the chip business, I think they should be forced to spin off the ISA-licensing portion of the business. Otherwise, they have a substantial conflict of interest.

    If they were smart, they'd have done this on their own, before RISC-V got much momentum behind it. Now, it's almost too late to do anything to slow RISC-V's inexorable rise. It's not surprising, as IBM also waited too long to establish the OpenPOWER Foundation.

    P.S. SPARC was possibly the original open ISA, with SPARC International having been established in 1989.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARC#Description
    Reply