Qualcomm scores big win over Arm in contentious lawsuit — U.S. court rejects Arm’s lawsuit, confirms Qualcomm’s can use Oryon cores acquired via Nuvia

Qualcomm
(Image credit: Qualcomm)

Qualcomm, along with its subsidiary Nuvia, have finally won the legal battle against Arm Holdings, which had accused the chip-maker of violating license agreements tied to its chip designs. A U.S. District Court judge in Delaware ruled that neither Qualcomm nor its subsidiary breached any of Arm’s architecture license agreement (ALA), dismissing the lone remaining claim in the case and also rejecting Arm's request for a new trial.

The latest ruling follows Qualcomm’s trial victory from December 2024, where the company was found innocent. However, at the time, the jury was unable to agree on whether Nuvia violated its licensing terms with Arm.

Arm claimed that Qualcomm was supposed to renegotiate licensing terms following its acquisition of Nuvia. Additionally, Arm demanded that the designs be scrapped for allegedly breaching Nuvia’s original Arm licenses. Qualcomm, however, maintained that its existing Architecture License Agreement (ALA) for Arm’s instruction set architecture already extended to designs developed by its subsidiaries, including Nuvia.

Williams co-founded Nuvia in 2019 with the aim of building high-performance, energy-efficient custom CPU cores for datacenters, known as Phoenix. To do so, the company secured two licenses from Arm, including a Technology License Agreement (TLA) to modify existing cores and an Architecture License Agreement (ALA) to design custom ones. Since Nuvia’s strategy was to pursue custom designs from the outset, the team developed its cores from scratch, relying minimally on Arm’s physical IP.

Qualcomm has stated that a separate lawsuit against Arm is still ongoing. The case involves claims of breach of contract, interference with customer relationships, and conduct aimed at hindering innovation while promoting Arm’s own products over those of long-standing partners. The company added that it expects the trial to begin in March 2026.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Kunal Khullar
News Contributor

Kunal Khullar is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware.  He is a long time technology journalist and reviewer specializing in PC components and peripherals, and welcomes any and every question around building a PC.

  • Air2004
    "The latest ruling follows Qualcomm’s trial victory from December 2024, where the company was found innocent."


    You might wanna correct that sentence. Companies in a court of law are just like people when it comes to the verdict.... and in this case the proper term would be Not Guilty. The word "innocent" is never used when rendering a verdict.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    Air2004 said:
    "The latest ruling follows Qualcomm’s trial victory from December 2024, where the company was found innocent."


    You might wanna correct that sentence. Companies in a court of law are just like people when it comes to the verdict.... and in this case the proper term would be Not Guilty. The word "innocent" is never used when rendering a verdict.
    Splitting hairs, are we?

    Innocent comes from the Latin verb "nocere", which means to harm or injure, the prefix "in" the equivalent of "un" in many Germanic languages.

    Innocent thus means unharmed or uninjured, something that doesn't really fit an actor, more a passive subject, whereas here it was about Qualcomm doing something potially ill or being malfeasant (faire mal, French this time around).

    So 'not guilty' is a much better fit semantically, no matter what those wannabe Latin speakers of the jurisprudence use, while I'm not convinced that actually applied in this case.
    Reply