Sabrent Rocket 5 2TB SSD review: Rocketing to new heights

An exceptionally fast PCIe 5.0 SSD

Sabrent Rocket 5 2TB SSD
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Comparison Products

Today we have some serious contenders going up against the Rocket 5, including Phison’s Max14um reference design as well as other fast drives like the Crucial T705 and Teamgroup Cardez Z540. Slower PCIe 5.0 SSDs are also included with the Crucial T700, Gigabyte Aorus Gen5 10000, and Adata Legend 970. The Samsung 990 EVO is also technically a PCIe 5.0 drive, but it only runs with two lanes in that mode.

High-end PCIe 4.0 SSDs include the Samsung 990 Pro and the WD Black SN850X. So-called “budget” 4.0 drives can often rival high-end alternatives, and the best two we have on hand are the Crucial T500 and Corsair MP600 Elite.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Shane Downing
Freelance Reviewer

Shane Downing is a Freelance Reviewer for Tom’s Hardware US, covering consumer storage hardware.

  • emike09
    Could care less about 14GB/s reads. PCI-e 4 speeds are plenty. Hell, even PCIe 3 speeds are plenty for most situations. Give me affordable 8+TB drives at PCIe 3 or 4 speeds.
    Reply
  • NeoMorpheus
    emike09 said:
    Could care less about 14GB/s reads. PCI-e 4 speeds are plenty. Hell, even PCIe 3 speeds are plenty for most situations. Give me affordable 8+TB drives at PCIe 3 or 4 speeds.
    Wondering the same thing, why they always go for speed but not for capacity?

    I would love a cheap enough 8 tb nvme for a nas. Given the ethernet port speed limitations, the nvme doesnt need to be that fast.
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    NeoMorpheus said:
    Wondering the same thing, why they always go for speed but not for capacity?
    Only so much they can stick onto a 2280. I imagine if they had a 22110 or better yet, the size of the old 2.5" SSDs, they could put a lot more capacity in them. But the common physical format is just the M.2 stick now.
    Reply
  • emike09
    2Be_or_Not2Be said:
    Only so much they can stick onto a 2280. I imagine if they had a 22110 or better yet, the size of the old 2.5" SSDs, they could put a lot more capacity in them. But the common physical format is just the M.2 stick now.
    U.2 and U.3 exists. But only in the server/datacenter world or with hacky adapters and compromises. There was a terrible attempt to bring it to the prosumer world but that failed miserably. I put the ASUS Hyper M.2 x16 Gen 4 on my Asus X299 board to expand my NVMe capacity since I couldn't get enough NVMe storage, but that's still a weird solution even though it works great and my mobo/CPU supports it well.

    But I'm with ya. Bring back 2.5" form factor SSDs. Hell I'd take a monster 3.5" SSD.
    Reply
  • Notton
    For the upper end of what is possible, WD/Kioxia has a 2TB/die density NAND chip, and there is room to slap 4 of those onto a single 2280 stick, if dual sided.

    Quite a lot of 4TB 2280 sticks use either 2x2TB or 4x1TB chips, the latter of which usually require dual sided.

    The pricing on the 4TB Sabrent Rocket 5 at $730 is insane.
    Crucial T700 4TB is $600 regular, and is on sale for $473.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Got a cheap 22110 toshiba xd5 at ebay. For storage only.
    Can't see near future using some o of these pci 5 ssd... my pci 4 idle burn it self. My old pci 3 intel 670p stay at ambient temps.
    These new ssd it's good only for small benchmarks for daily use its only pain
    Reply
  • NeoMorpheus
    emike09 said:
    But I'm with ya. Bring back 2.5" form factor SSDs. Hell I'd take a monster 3.5" SSD.
    Sadly, sata ports slowness might be the reason they dont do it, but again, the ethernet port its even slower.

    That said, i’m pretty sure that if they went for size instead of speed(on some models of course) the prices wouldnt be this insane.
    Reply
  • emike09
    NeoMorpheus said:
    Sadly, sata ports slowness might be the reason they dont do it, but again, the ethernet port its even slower.
    Oh I'm not saying bring back SATA, hell no. Just the 2.5" or even 3.5" form factor with PCI-e connectivity. 2.5" drives exist with PCI-e in the U.2/3 standard, they're just not available in the consumer world.
    Reply
  • NeoMorpheus
    emike09 said:
    Oh I'm not saying bring back SATA, hell no. Just the 2.5" or even 3.5" form factor with PCI-e connectivity. 2.5" drives exist with PCI-e in the U.2/3 standard, they're just not available in the consumer world.
    Ah ok, makes sense.
    Reply
  • Leptir
    I've recently bought a 4TB 990 Pro and for the life of me I can't understand how this Rocket 5 drive can justify costing twice as much. Yeah, it's faster, but only in some scenarios. I'd buy it in an instant if it would speed up my work (software development), but it won't. Certainly not by enough to even remotely justify the price.

    I'm sure that eventually all drives will be PCIe 5, but for now this technology is ridiculously overpriced and the performance gains are of little irrelevant to most people, even power users. Seems to me that the Rocket 5 is the ideal drive for people with more money than common sense. At least until the price comes down.
    Reply