China brain computer interface outfit accelerates to human trials in quest to outpace Neuralink — mix of government backing and investor enthusiasm speeds time to market for NeuroXess

NeuroXess BCI technology
(Image credit: NeuroXess)

China could overtake the U.S. in brain computer interface (BCI) technology leadership in the coming months/years, thanks to a fortunate mix of government support and investor enthusiasm. In a recent interview with the Financial Times (FT), Tiger Tao, the founder of Shanghai-based NeuroXess, highlighted the rapid progress of the firm’s BCI technology. NeuroXess (no relation to Intel XeSS) was set up in 2021 and has already reported some successful human BCI trials.

The FT report comes less than six months after we covered news of China’s plans to outpace Neuralink with a state-backed BCI blitz, to coin a phrase.

NeuroXess BCI technology

BCI testing: the patient moves the circular cursor to hit the square. (Image credit: NeuroXess)

As for NeuroXess’ success, it seems to have been rapid. As mentioned in the intro, it was only founded in 2021. Now just half a decade old, it has recently boasted of using its BCI tech to allow a paralyzed patient to control a computer cursor. Moreover, the patient was using their BCI for computing tasks just five days after the implant operation.

NeuroXess technology

NeuroXess trials have been using invasive BCI tech, and partly because of this, the focus has been on areas of strong medical need – like patients with paralysis or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). No one without a strong medical need would be interested in a brain operation, and such a device being implanted.

The NeuroXess BCI uses a polyimide and metal mesh, but it sits on the patient’s brain and doesn’t pierce any brain tissue. This contrasts with Elon Musk’s Neuralink, which uses an implant bristling with microscopic threads to capture neural signals from within the brain. There have been concerns about electrodes going into brain tissue, causing scarring and thus the degradation of brain signal readings over time. Neuralink denies this is an issue, with its super-thin electrodes, butNeuroXess sidesteps the issue altogether.

Comparing Neuralink and NeuroXess in performance terms, the latest performance data shared by the FT suggests the former has achieved brain links at 10 bps in trials, and the Chinese tech is capable of 5.2 bps. You can see the NeuroXess speeds confirmed in the video linked in the intro.

While the race for the best invasive implant BCI continues, a BCI expert that the FT talked to noted that firms are using the latest knowledge from this frontier to the benefit of non-invasive systems. It is hoped that the advances could eventually improve non-invasive BCIs so much that operations/implants become minor or unnecessary, in general.

This optimization work is expected to be easier in China, with a virtuous circle coming into play: more data, lower costs, resulting in more users, and more data.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • -Fran-
    If you mix that with this:

    https://www.techspot.com/news/111391-robots-run-up-walls-perform-martial-arts-china.html
    Then I'd say they're well into expanding their army capabilities on several fronts that could overwhelm any defense system.

    And yeah, replacing their own people for factories and whatnot.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • alan.campbell99
    When comes to the generally reported benefit/use case for helping the disabled I think BCI is a worthy line of development, especially if non-invasive interfaces can be developed and proven.
    I think, however, that's it quite easy to stoke privacy concerns as well. Personally I wouldn't trust Neuralink at all given that Elon 'move fast and break things' Musk is involved.
    Reply
  • BloodLust2222
    alan.campbell99 said:
    When comes to the generally reported benefit/use case for helping the disabled I think BCI is a worthy line of development, especially if non-invasive interfaces can be developed and proven.
    I think, however, that's it quite easy to stoke privacy concerns as well. Personally I wouldn't trust Neuralink at all given that Elon 'move fast and break things' Musk is involved.
    I wouldn't trust any company involved in such tech. However, This is the future for the disabled and they would give anything to be able to function like a normal human. The next 10-15 years will be full of wonders only thought of a short time ago to be something in a movie. This can either be greatness or a dire mark on humanity.
    Reply
  • dynamicreflect
    If it succeeds, then all good; if not, no worries! China has the largest organ harvest system, your organs will not be wasted! Win-win!
    Reply