The MAG Z390 Tomahawk suffers blows in the graphics scores of 3DMark as well as the GPU-heavy Compubench Ocean Surface (FFT), but its Cinebench rendering score looks fine. ASRock’s Z390 Extreme4 falls behind in PCMark 8, leaving the Gigabyte Z390 Gaming SLI as the only completely consistent performer in these tests. Are these precursors to real-world applications?
Having suffered though GPU computational but not rendering apps in our synthetic tests, the MAG Z390 Tomahawk produced good FPS in Ashes and F1 2015 but again fell behind in Metro LL Redux and Talos. Meanwhile the ASRock and Gigabyte boards raced against each other’s averages to stay ahead of MSI.
Less time means more performance in productivity tests, where the Z390 Extreme4 falls flat in both Adobe CC and MS Office tasks. The shorter the task, the further it fell behind, and it was so close to average in longer tests that many users are unlikely to notice these differences.
Power, Heat and Efficiency
CPH core voltage impacts power draw and heat, but the MAG Z390 Tomahawk had the highest reading at around 1.26V while the Z390 Gaming SLI had the lowest read at around 1.14V. The Z390 Extreme4 read approximately 1.22V, so there must be something causing it to draw more power at full load than any of its competitors, and it’s hard to imagine that its extra USB hub and SATA controller are the culprits since both were idle.
The MAG Z390 Tomahawk had the highest CPU core voltage and the highest CPU core temperature. The Z390 Gaming SLI had the lowest CPU core voltage and the lowest core temperature. Since the MAG Z390 Tomahawk also had the highest voltage regulator temperature, that can’t be to blame for the Z390 Extreme4’s power draw. There is a possibility that unused resources are not idling down properly, and those could include the extra USB hub and SATA controller.
Since these are the only three boards we’ve tested with the Core i5-9600K in today’s configuration, we tossed all previous results out of our percent-based averages. The Z390 Gaming SLI wins the performance metric by 1.6% thanks to a lack of any particularly weak singular results that might have dragged its average down. The Z390 Extreme4’s average performance loss is even more significant, as it’s nearly 3% slower than the Gigabyte board. And since the top-performing Z390 Gaming SLI also had the lowest power draw, its efficiency score is fantastic, while that of the Z390 Extreme4 is almost equally horrendous.
|Performance Winner: Gigabyte Z390 Gaming SLI||Z390 Gaming SLI|
MORE: Best Motherboards
MORE: All Motherboard Content