GeForce GTX 750 Ti Review: Maxwell Adds Performance Using Less Power
Features
published
Results: Battlefield 4
The move to Battlefield 4 allows us to choose the Ultra preset, though we drop MSAA to 2x and ambient occlusion to the SSAO setting at 1920x1080.
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is certainly playable, although its frame rate does dip below 30 FPS on a couple of occasions. Nevertheless, it comes within striking distance of Nvidia's GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Three cards suffer from frame time variance spikes at these detail settings, and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is one of them. The other two are AMD's Radeon R7 260X and HD 7850, both of which have 1 GB of graphics memory.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Results: Battlefield 4
Prev Page Results: Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag Next Page Results: BioShock InfiniteChris Angelini is an Editor Emeritus at Tom's Hardware US. He edits hardware reviews and covers high-profile CPU and GPU launches.
More about gpus
231 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
meluvcookies on performance, I'll take the extra frames of the 265, but damn, for 60w, I'm totally impressed by this card. both the 750Ti and the R7 265 would be decent upgrades from my aging GTX460.Reply -
s3anister But without the big cooler, GTX 750 Ti is daintier than a lot of sound cards we've tested.
I'm pretty sure you meant to type "video cards" on page one there. Cheers. -
Bloob AlsoReplyIt’s difficult to make this story all about frame rates when we’re comparing a 60 W GPU to a 150 W processor
Is a bit confusing. -
cangelini
Actually meant sound card :) It's definitely smaller than a small video card, but I even have sound cards here that are larger.But without the big cooler, GTX 750 Ti is daintier than a lot of sound cards we've tested.
I'm pretty sure you meant to type "video cards" on page one there. Cheers. -
Sangeet Khatri Well.. there is not a lot of performance in it, but I love it for a reason that it is a 60W card. I mean for 60W Nvidia has seriously nailed it. The only competition is way behind, the 7750 performs a lot less for similar wattage.Let's see how AMD replies to this because after the launch of 750Ti, the 7750 is no longer the best card for upgrading for people who have a 350W PSU.I don't generally say this, but Nvidia well done! Take a bow.Reply -
houldendub Nice little card, awesome! I feel like this would be an absolutely awesome test bed for a dual chip version, great performance with minimal power usage.Reply -
thdarkshadow The whole time I was reading the review I was like it isn't beating the 650ti boost... :( but then I remembered it uses less than half the power lol. I am impressed nvidia. While I make purchases more on performance than power consumption I can still appreciate what nvidia is doingReply -
houldendub 12707408 said:Anybody else notice the lesser shaders and TMUs on the Zotac card in GPU-Z?
Don't take this as fact, but the drivers look newer for the Zotac card than the others, possibly just a bug with the older drivers? The cards are advertised as having 640 shaders anyway.
Also weird, the GPU-Z screenshot is taken with Windows 8, whereas the Gigabyte and MSI cards are on Windows 7. The mystery continues...