VIA KT333 Put To The Test: 18 Motherboards Compared

CPU And Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002

• Page 1: Introduction
• Page 2: Dilemma Of The VIA KT333: Still No USB 2.0 Support
• Page 3: VIA KT333: Architecture
• Page 4: GeForce 4 Compatibility: Not Unimportant
• Page 5: Booting Via USB: The State Of The Technology
• Page 6: Features Table
• Page 7: Features Table, Continued
• Page 8: Features Table, Continued
• Page 9: Features Table, Continued
• Page 10: An Overview Of All Boards
• Page 11: Acorp 7KT333: A Classic OEM Product
• Page 12: Asus A7V333: Thermal Protection And Jumper Overkill
• Page 13: Aopen AK77-333: Not Feature-Rich
• Page 14: Biostar M7VIF: Ready For Revisions
• Page 15: Chaintech 7VJA4: Still In The Testing Stages
• Page 16: Epox EP-8K3A+: The Quickest, Plus Crashes
• Page 17: Enmic 8TTX2+: Fast And Stable
• Page 18: FIC AN17: Past Its Prime?
• Page 19: Gigabyte GA-7VRXP: One Of The Best
• Page 20: Jetway V333K: A Typical OEM Board
• Page 21: MSI KT3 Ultra-ARU: Strong On Features, Weak On Performance
• Page 22: QDI KuDoz 7E/333-A: A Step Up To The Middle Class
• Page 23: Shuttle AK35 GTR V2.2: More Performance Offered
• Page 24: Soltek SL-75DRV5: Stable, With Thermal Protection
• Page 25: Soyo SY-KT333 Dragon Ultra: Absolutely Over The Top
• Page 26: Lucky Star K7VA333: Not Quite Mature
• Page 27: Fastfame 6VQK: Latecomer
• Page 28: Test Setup And Details
• Page 29: Benchmarks Under Windows 2000
• Page 30: OpenGL Performance: Quake 3 Arena
• Page 31: DirectX 8 Games: 3D Mark 2001
• Page 32: SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU And Multimedia
• Page 33: CPU And Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002
• Page 34: 3D Rendering Performance: SPECviewperf
• Page 35: Archiving: WinACE 2.11
• Page 36: Conclusion