Sapphire RX 7700 XT Pure Review: Pretty but Expensive

It's also exceptionally quiet, which helps justify the price.

Sapphire RX 7700 XT Pure product photos
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Sapphire RX 7700 XT Pure doesn't differ much from any other RX 7700 XT card when it comes to performance, but it's the little things that matter. In this case, the most compelling reasons to pick up the Pure are that you like the way it looks (a subjective reason at best), or because you want a quieter graphics card. That's sufficient justification to fork over your lunch money if you're in the market for a 7700 XT, we'd say.

In our tests, the Sapphire card wasn't really audible above the noise created by the rest of our test PC. We don't have a noisy PC by any stretch, but the CPU cooler can definitely spin up the fans to keep the Core i9-13900K cool while gaming. And "cool" is relative, as Intel's latest CPU can often sit at more than 90C under modest loads. If you're building a PC and want to keep noise pollution down, besides selecting a better CPU cooler, grabbing the Sapphire card would be a good approach.

Of course it's not just about noise, and the same drawbacks with the RX 7700 XT still apply here. Specifically, the RX 7800 XT offers better bang for the buck. Except, that only applies if you're looking at less robust cooling solutions for the RX 7800 XT — like the dual-fan Sapphire RX 7800 XT Pulse. We haven't tested that model and thus can't speak directly to its cooling or noise performance, but one less fan will make a difference.

Most of the triple-fan 7800 XT cards meanwhile seem to cost closer to $550 rather than $500. Like the Sapphire RX 7800 XT Pure, which costs $569 — $100 more than the 7700 XT Pure. That's 21% more money, for about 18% more performance. But what we'd really like to see are 7700 XT cards selling for closer to $400 and 7800 XT cards at $500 or less.

Sapphire RX 7700 XT Pure product photos

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

If $469 is a hard limit, your choices boil down to the RX 7700 XT, a previous generation RX 6800, or potentially Nvidia's RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. We don't particularly care for the latter; if the 7700 XT feels overpriced, the 4060 Ti 16GB feels much more so. Alternatively, you could drop down to $280 for an RTX 4060, $320 for an RX 6700 XT, or $370 for an RTX 4060 Ti 8GB, all of which end up as better values than a $470 7700 XT.

But again, that assumes you're willing to just take whatever card you can find for the lowest price possible, noise levels be damned. You'll generally get the lowest noise levels from triple-fan cards, which means at a minimum you'd have to spend $310 for an RTX 4060, $330 for an RX 6700 XT, or $400 for an RTX 4060 T — and even though all of those are triple-fan cards, we still can't personally attest to their having low noise levels. Based on the style of fans (specifically, none of those have integrated rims), they're probably all going to be noisier cards.

Trying to find a high-quality graphics card that's as quiet as possible can be tricky, and the price of admission always tends to be $60–$100 higher than "typical" models using the same GPU. You know the ones we're talking about, with two rimless fans that inevitably make more noise. In that sense, the Sapphire RX 7700 XT Pure actually looks quite reasonable: It's like a $400 RX 7700 XT, with a $70 add-on fee to get a quiet card.

Considering the least expensive RX 7700 XT cards cost $450, there's unfortunately no option to go much lower on pricing while sticking with the same GPU. RX 6800 might be your best bet to cut costs if you want an AMD card with this level of performance, though prices on that GPU keep bouncing between $400 and $430. The former is reasonable; the latter, not so much. Nvidia's alternatives have the usual pros and cons as well.

Ultimately, Sapphire's RX 7700 XT Pure is worth considering, particularly if you want a cool and quiet PC, and it looks nice as well. We feel it's worth the extra $20 compared to the base models, at least for users that put more value on noise levels. Because silence truly is golden, in more ways than one.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • hotaru.hino
    PEnns said:
    I don't know about you, but the majority of thinking people don't buy a car based on its color!!
    I would argue a lot of people, if they have the means to buy almost any car they want, will choose one car over another based on its color. Or even ask the dealer for a specific color if it's available.

    About half the reason why I jumped on the motorcycle I bought a while ago was because being a Kawasaki, it didn't come in that obnoxious Kawasaki green (the other half was I was ready to move on from my first bike which it was replacing.) And I would say a non-trivial reason why I chose the car that I did was because I wanted to have matching colors with my bike.

    Is it important in the grand scheme of things? No. But I had the choice. And if people didn't really care about color, why do you think that option exists? May as well go the Ford way and paint all cars black; it'll save them a lot in manufacturing.
    Reply
  • Good looks aside, i fear its pathetic 12GB VRAM renders it completely useless for modern gaming.
    Reply
  • punkncat
    Wow, future locked thread.

    For my own part, these cards are a bit of fresh air in the current market. It still stands that the MSRP on this, the 7800, and it's 6xxx forefathers is a bit confusing from a customer standpoint. For my own part, I love to see and often pick graphics cards as well as other components based solely on them NOT having unicorn puke spewing out of them.
    Reply
  • Geef
    Quick piece of unrelated info: I bought a ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT 16GB
    It is a very quiet card. Even while playing Starfield for several hours at a time. Lots of time tests. ;)
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    punkncat said:
    Wow, future locked thread.

    For my own part, these cards are a bit of fresh air in the current market. It still stands that the MSRP on this, the 7800, and it's 6xxx forefathers is a bit confusing from a customer standpoint. For my own part, I love to see and often pick graphics cards as well as other components based solely on them NOT having unicorn puke spewing out of them.
    It's why the ability to change your RGB lighting options exists. Default might be rainbow on most cards/mobos, but it's simple enough (usually) to set it to pure red, green, blue, or some other color. That's the crux of the issue. Adding lighting, but limiting it to a single color that can't be changed, is going half-way on a feature.
    Reply
  • punkncat
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    It's why the ability to change your RGB lighting options exists. Default might be rainbow on most cards/mobos, but it's simple enough (usually) to set it to pure red, green, blue, or some other color. That's the crux of the issue. Adding lighting, but limiting it to a single color that can't be changed, is going half-way on a feature.

    I don't disagree, per se, but also that this is a design decision based on what the manufacturer wanted to put forth in regard to their vision of the look they were going for. I feel that it is nice to have choices on this and that manufacturers are giving them, even when spartan.

    edit- I would also add that in order to control RBG often involves downloading a companion app that may or may not play right with other lighting apps and so on. Without doubt, open and eating resources albeit a small amount, but have a couple of those running for this and that part to light the way you want adds up.
    Reply
  • AgentBirdnest
    I would have thought they'd give it blue lighting... cuz, ya know... sapphires. : P

    I really love those fan blades. Cool angular shapes. Too bad I'd never ever see it when the computer is on, though. : P

    I love silence... I'd pay an extra $30, even $50, for a card that has quieter cooling. But between a $480 7700XT with excellent cooling, and a $500 7800XT with adequate cooling... I'd pick the latter. AMD prices the 7700XT so weirdly...

    Geef said:
    Quick piece of unrelated info: I bought a ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT 16GB
    It is a very quiet card. Even while playing Starfield for several hours at a time. Lots of time tests. ;)
    That's awesome! Congrats! : )
    I feel like ASRock has really stepped up their game over the last couple of years, and makes some of the most compelling components now.
    Reply
  • nitrium
    It's also about twice as fast as the RTX 2060 (and costs $100 more than the 2060's launch price), and twice as fast as GTX 1080.
    I see neither of those cards in your charts. I know that the RTX 4060Ti is not (quite) twice as fast as an RTX 2060 in many (most?) games. The RTX 4070 is the first 4000 series card that gets there.
    Reply
  • wingfinger
    I don't care for lighting effects myself.

    What I don't like is that marketing and management probably think that they are providing an exciting and desirable product because of the lighting effects, instead of providing a reliable, great performance for the price product.

    On a similar note, do people still buy graphics cars be because they are overclocked? I would buy an overlocked card, only because I don't want the lowest bin GPU possible. But, I would be looking for a mild overclock, never a high overclock.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    The cooler on the 7800XT Pure is the same, right? If so, I might pick it up.
    Reply