Skip to main content

Phison S10: Toshiba MLC And TLC Versus Micron L95B MLC

Total Storage Bandwidth

Overall performance over time shows that MLC flash is faster, but normal user latency between commands absorbs the performance differences. It really comes down to the workload. And for most users, TLC delivers a large enough performance increase over hard disk drives to make it attractive on the desktop. 

  • Nuckles_56
    whoa, where did you guys get some 4800GB just for the battery life tests?
    Reply
  • James Mason
    whoa, where did you guys get some 4800GB just for the battery life tests?

    Yeah so many typos I almost thought they actually did get 5 terabyte SSDs somehow.
    Reply
  • Frozen Fractal
    I was arranging a chart while reading this article to see who actually wins. Seems like Toshiba 15nm MLC wins the test, with Micron 16nm MLC close on tail and TLCs wayyyy off :D.

    It is kinda disappointing to see TLCs being outperformed so brutally. I guess increased SLC buffer should mitigate the problem? Samsung already has like this in the EVO 2TB so what do you think Chris?

    Also, does lithography has anything to do with performance? I mean Micron's NANDs are close to Toshiba's MLCs and Micron's cells are just 1nm bigger than Toshiba's MLCs. Can this be co-related somehow?
    Reply
  • WyomingKnott
    It is so cool that they provided these for a head-to-head comparison. Finally, a comparison with all other variables really held even.
    Reply