Major Intel Linux driver projects are dying due to Intel layoffs and corporate restructuring — compatibility and reliability issues could increase over time

Linux
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Intel is continuing to lay off more Linux maintainers due to corporate restructuring within the company. Phoronix reports that at least four more Intel Linux maintainers have left the company, leaving some of the Linux drivers they worked on without support.

Mustafa Ismail, maintainer of the Intel Ethernet RDMA driver, has left the company, leaving only one other Intel engineer to keep supporting the driver. Intel's Tianfei Zhang, the maintainer for Intel's PTP DFL ToD driver, is also no longer at Intel, leaving the driver without any support. Intel's PTP DFL ToD driver runs the time-of-day device on its FPGA cards.

Intel's WWAN ISOM driver is yet another driver that is now left with zero support, as Intel Linux maintainer M. Chetan Kumar is no longer working at the company. The WWAN ISOM driver is one of Intel's drivers responsible for driving its older M.2 modems.

Keem Bay and Anil S Keshavamurthy have also left Intel. Bay was a DRM driver maintainer, while Keshavamurthy was a maintainer of Intel's kernel probes code, which aids in debugging and performance profiling. Finally, two engineers who worked on the T7XX 5G WWAN driver were also let go, leaving the aforementioned driver without support.

According to other reports by Phoronix, Intel has been losing Linux driver developers/maintainers at an accelerated rate since February of this year. Layoffs have continued to surge since then, with Intel's latest round of layoffs resulting in over 12,000 personnel being cut from the company.

Intel is quickly losing traction in the Linux space due to layoffs of its Linux maintainers. Intel used to maintain a significant presence in Linux kernel development, thanks to its long-standing dominance in the CPU space, and contributed to the development of drivers for various hardware systems, including CPUs, GPUs, storage, and networking. 

TOPICS
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • jg.millirem
    “Intel used to….” is a theme of the 2020s.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    I can’t imagine this will be good for their server business.
    Reply
  • King_V
    Yeah, but these things are only relevant to the long term health of the company. It doesn't do anything for the immediate, short term profits.
    THINK OF THE SHAREHOLDERS!!!
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Server market will be eaten by arm products x86 it's on the last hurrah... Intel almost ded by now, If the king blue goes down the red one will die too.
    Reply
  • heffeque
    Amdlova said:
    Server market will be eaten by arm products x86 it's on the last hurrah... Intel almost ded by now, If the king blue goes down the red one will die too.
    Why would red go down? AMD could go the Sound Wave path if needed. Maybe even Intel.
    Reply
  • shady28
    Pierce2623 said:
    I can’t imagine this will be good for their server business.

    Why? These were various niche driver maintainers. Like the T7XX 5G device is a MediaTek item. Based on the attitudes of people on forums like this one, Intel's altruism has netted zero respect. Why would they continue it?
    Reply
  • acadia11
    Amdlova said:
    Server market will be eaten by arm products x86 it's on the last hurrah... Intel almost ded by now, If the king blue goes down the red one will die too.
    Arm is a serious threat to x86 but the vast software ecosystem that x86s leans heavily in its favor although this is changing … and x86 has undergone rapid adoption of RISC like behaviors and various other techniques to address the power consumption differences. As pure risc and cisc designs don’t really apply in modern CPUs for sure though this is a real threat to AMD and Intel. AmD is obviously in better position but their dominance in server space more specifically data center exposes them more …
    Reply
  • Air2004
    Who needs maintainers ? Intel will be referred to as "The company formerly known as" in another 6 years. In 10 years a good bit of their IP will be owned by foreign entities, some of whom will be hostile to US Interests.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    shady28 said:
    Why? These were various niche driver maintainers.
    Aren't some of these maintainers for items like CPU frequency/temperature?

    That is quite important for servers. Critical, even. And in servers, Windows is not the top dog - not even close. In servers Linux rules the roost.
    Reply
  • phead128
    Intel Products is lucrative and highly profitable. Intel Foundry is dead weight and Morris Chang was right, Intel should have never gone into Foundry in first place.
    Reply