Adata chairman says DRAM shortage will last another 10 years — dismisses AI bubble talk until '2040 or 2050'

ADATA headquarters with logo
(Image credit: ADATA)

Adata chairman Simon Chen (Chen Li-bai) said the global DRAM shortage will run for another 10 years and that talk of an AI bubble is premature, according to a Commercial Times report. Chen made the comments after Taiwanese stocks slumped in the wake of TSMC's record second-quarter results, a selloff that revived concerns about overheated AI investment. The same report carries Adata's forecast that DRAM contract prices will climb another 20% to 30% in the third quarter, with NAND flash rising 35% to 40%.

Electricity, particularly green power, and memory will be the world's two scarcest resources over the next decade, Chen told Commercial Times. He rejected the argument that Meta and other cloud providers renting out spare compute capacity prove investment has overshot demand. Chen countered that AI applications will spread across business, government, and consumer markets, and that analysts who judge the cycle from short-term capital spending or a single company's utilization rate underestimate long-term demand.

Beyond data centers, he pointed to robots, driverless vehicles, unmanned factories and stores, smart homes, and low-Earth-orbit satellites, a pool of edge devices he said could reach tens of billions of units. He also said that the industry can revisit the bubble question after 2030, to "discuss whether the AI bubble will happen in 2040 or 2050," per the report.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Meanwhile, memory makers aren't standing still on capacity. SK hynix raised a record $26.5 billion in its U.S. IPO this month to fund HBM manufacturing expansion, Nanya plans to quadruple capital spending to $6.2 billion in 2027, and China's CXMT is reportedly approaching Micron-scale DRAM output this year.

Chen argues that none of it loosens the market, and that the big three suppliers learned from past downturns and will expand cautiously rather than repeat the disorderly capacity races that cratered prices in earlier cycles. At the same time, Chinese makers remain constrained by restricted access to semiconductor equipment and multi-year fab construction timelines. On that basis, he said current talk of supply and demand easing has no solid foundation, and he expects prices and module-maker profits to keep rising through the second half.

Chen's forecasts align with his company's balance sheet. Adata had stockpiled more than NT$30 billion in chip inventory by late February and was among the Taiwanese module makers that raised roughly $880 million in debt and share placements to keep buying chips, so every quarter of rising contract prices lifts the value of what it already holds. Back in October, he said the simultaneous shortage of DRAM, NAND, SSDs, and hard drives was the first he'd seen in 30 years in the industry, and DRAM contract prices have since risen as much as 171% year over year.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • usertests
    Nonsensical bubble speak. And if it lasted that long, the big 3 (or 4 with CXMT) will start to see competition for a change, from NEO Semiconductor or SAIMEMORY, for example.

    But it probably won't.

    The AI Bubble Is No Ordinary Bubble
    Tech companies are going to need to start generating huge revenues and huge profits to justify these valuations. OpenAI needs to spin up roughly $100 billion in free cash flow by 2030, according to calculations by Harrison Rolfes of PitchBook. Analysts expect it will lose $10 billion to $30 billion that year. If it does—or if more communities ban data centers, or if non-tech companies prove reticent about purchasing AI software, or if China develops AI models that do not require so much computing power—we could be in for a massive correction. The AI economy is a trillion-dollar ouroboros of buying and selling, investment and equity staking, all happening between San Francisco and San Jose. Big Tech is advancing money to AI start-ups to buy cloud services from Big Tech, which is using the revenue to run new AI models … you get the idea. What happens to one firm could happen to all of them.
    Reply
  • Ricket5
    usertests said:
    Nonsensical bubble speak. And if it lasted that long, the big 3 (or 4 with CXMT) will start to see competition for a change, from NEO Semiconductor or SAIMEMORY, for example.

    But it probably won't.

    The AI Bubble Is No Ordinary Bubble
    What the tech companies are pitching investors is this will kill jobs. Anything that kills jobs is going to get money thrown at it. The CEO of Palantir was more direct. They jobs they are going to kill are white collar jobs mostly held by liberals. This takes money and power away from liberals. This is a political project.

    AI is worth everything because it is a way to install a world governed by tech accountable only to a few right wing billionaires and trillionaires and nobody else gets to have a say in anything ever again. All the rich people pushing this buy into network states, don't like democracy, and are fascists. You cannot put a price on establishing this sort of global totalitarian state. So the bubble will keep going until it's locked in. Then the fun starts.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    Just trying to prepare consumers for continued extortion.
    Reply
  • Moores_Ghost
    Ahahaha...hilarious. Force the intern to write a puff piece of almost pure speculation save the rantings of a madman (Chen) and a pitch from a Pitch. I do not think so. If they do not sort it soon things will break down faster than most think. AI is weak and FAR from general. Brute forcing instead of truly eloquent solutions should tell you we aren't even close.
    I'm waiting for the dozen RAM startups and private companies to supply consumer for consumer and ditch the fake nonsense that "AI" is.
    Greedy people don't leave money on the table and if anyone is paying attention, the average consumer has exited the RAM space until such a time as it's stable.
    Reply
  • Kindaian
    I've left the RAM space 4 years ago, when i got my two computers with 64 GB of ram (granted is slow ram for nowadays standards).

    So see you all in 5 years.
    Reply
  • CelicaGT
    These people are not stupid, they just know that tech illiterate investors are.
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    The problem is there are only 3 producers, and obviously they are intend to keep their money making going for as long as possible.
    Reply
  • Faiakes
    In other words: "We're going to be robbing you for quite some time."
    Reply
  • thestryker
    The longer things stay as they are the more of a self fulfilling prophecy it becomes. If supply doesn't stabilize and return to some semblance of normalcy this will just accelerate the collapse. Someone still has to be able to buy products and with wages how they are and prices doing what they are people just aren't.
    Reply
  • call101010
    DRAM shortage will never last 10 years ... China will step in for sure and fill the demand in 5 years to come.
    Reply