Microsoft’s AI boss says AI can replace every white-collar job in 18 months — ‘We’re going to have a human-level performance on most, if not all, professional tasks’

Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman
(Image credit: Getty Images)

Microsoft AI chief executive Mustafa Suleyman said that artificial intelligence can replace most white-collar work in the 12 to 18 months. The Microsoft head said this during a YouTube interview with the Financial Times, where they talked about the company’s aims to achieve “humanist superintelligence.” During this conversation, the topic steered into artificial capable intelligence, which was the term that Suleyman coined for the phase in AI development between basic large language models (LLMs) and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

Mustafa Suleyman sets out Microsoft AI's goal of 'humanist superintelligence' | FT Interview - YouTube Mustafa Suleyman sets out Microsoft AI's goal of 'humanist superintelligence' | FT Interview - YouTube
Watch On

When the host asked him about the latter, he said, “I think we’re going to have a human-level performance on most, if not all, professional tasks. So, white-collar work, where you’re sitting down at a computer — either being, you know, a lawyer, or an accountant, or a project manager, or a marketing person — most of those tasks will be fully automated by an AI within the next 12 to 18 months.”

This line echoes that voiced other business leaders, with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proclaiming that AI will wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs in five years. Ford CEO Jim Farley agrees with this prediction, saying that “AI will leave a lot of white-collar people behind.” Even scientists are worried about this, with an MIT simulation showing that AI could replace 11.7% of U.S. workers across multiple industries and not just in tech.

However, others are a bit more skeptical about this prediction. While there has been a claimed increase in AI-driven layoffs last year, some researchers suggested that this was instead driven by poor business performance blamed on exaggerated AI capabilities. Another MIT study showed that 95% of enterprise use of generative AI had no measurable impact on profit and loss, while a report from Pricewaterhouse Coopers that 55% of chief executives saw no benefits with the deployment of AI tools.

Still, Suleyman is confident about how AI can be used in nearly any application. “There are going to be billions of digital minds. There are going to be many, many different lineages of model [sic]. Creating a new model is like creating a podcast or writing a blog — it is going to be possible to design an AI that suits your requirements for every institution, organization, and person on the planet.”

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • hotaru251
    "ai isn't going to take your jobs" - last yr
    "ai is replacing all of you in 18 months" - this yr


    while it'll replace many jobs for the high education it won't replace legal jobs as ai's already failed repeatedly in courtroom.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    Of course they are going to say this.

    Have to keep stock prices up!

    They'd be fired if they said the truth: "The reality is, we're burning through trillions of dollars for LLMs that lose focus more than a 2 year old, hallucinate (imagine things), and that make mistakes 20-80% of the time. Furthermore, they are trained on available information and can't tell what's true and what's false."
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    Microslop = Sunken cost fallacy.
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    Not sure which is worst, the naivety or the wishful thinking.

    Question for the "great minds" making these predictions...If you get rid on entry level white collar positions with AI, how do you grow the mid-/upper-tier folks needed to proof the AI slop generated?
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    COLGeek said:
    Not sure which is worst, the naivety or the wishful thinking.

    Question for the "great minds" making these predictions...If you get rid on entry level white collar positions with AI, how do you grow the mid-/upper-tier folks needed to proof the AI slop generated?
    a/Zag5acQView: https://imgur.com/gallery/ai-is-garbage-Zag5acQ
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    If it's true what he's saying, his job will be gone also in 18 months.
    Should be a follow up article in 18 months asking him how it feels to be unemployed.
    Reply
  • nimbulan
    SomeoneElse23 said:
    Of course they are going to say this.

    Have to keep stock prices up!

    They'd be fired if they said the truth: "The reality is, we're burning through trillions of dollars for LLMs that lose focus more than a 2 year old, hallucinate (imagine things), and that make mistakes 20-80% of the time. Furthermore, they are trained on available information and can't tell what's true and what's false."
    The worst part is that they'll go ahead and replace jobs with AI despite the obvious problems.
    Reply
  • QuarterSwede
    1 of 2 things is going on here:
    1) Pumping the stock price by lying about LLM “AI” coding's potential OR
    2) He’s naive about LLMs coding's potential

    Since he is Microsoft’s AI CEO I’m going with 1.

    The reality is that LLMs don’t have the capacity to come up with anything new. They regurgitate what they are trained on and have zero creative ability. This is fundamentally different than how organic life learns.

    Is using LLMs as a tool to increase our coding speed going to take some jobs because now you need less white-collar coders to do the same workload? Absolutely. Devs are already using LLM coding to take months of work down to the day level (see Steven-Throughton-Smith’s recent updates to 3 apps in 1 day). BUT, in order to be that efficient you need to be proficient in coding already.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    QuarterSwede said:
    Is using LLMs as a tool to increase our coding speed going to take some jobs because now you need less white-collar coders to do the same workload? Absolutely. Devs are already using LLM coding to take months of work down to the day level (see Steven-Throughton-Smith’s recent updates to 3 apps in 1 day). BUT, in order to be that efficient you need to be proficient in coding already.
    Bingo.

    LLMs are tools that work well with extreme oversight, guidance, and double checking.

    I'm not joking about the attention span of a 2 year old.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    USAFRet said:
    a/Zag5acQView: https://imgur.com/gallery/ai-is-garbage-Zag5acQ
    I traced this down to the source, and the original post has been deleted.

    Comments on it indicate it's highly likely fake.

    But, I think we all know it could be true, which is why we initially believed it.
    Reply