UPS reportedly destroying packages due to customs confusion — thousands of parcels per day are seemingly affected by delays due to documentation issues

UPS planes on an airport ramp
(Image credit: Izyan Sultanali / Unsplash)

The removal of the de minimis exemption and the differing tariff rules on various nations have led to confusion in customs documentation and clearances. Because of this, some e-commerce stores have imposed exorbitant delivery fees to deter American customers. However, those who have continued to ship to the U.S. are now facing a new challenge: thousands of packages have been getting stuck in UPS hubs across the United States, as reported by NBC News.

The primary reason for these delays is the missing information, according to the company. “Because of changes to U.S. import regulations, we are seeing many packages that are unable to clear customs due to missing or incomplete information about the shipment required for customs clearance,” the company told NBC. Unfortunately, UPS cannot hold packages in limbo indefinitely. It said that it attempts to contact the shippers three times to complete the data that U.S. customs requires. If the company is unable to reach the shipper, it’s left with two choices.

“First, the package can be returned to the original shipper at their expense. Second, if the customer does not respond and the package cannot be cleared for delivery, disposing of the shipment is in compliance with U.S. customs regulations,” the company said. “We continue to work to bridge the gap of understanding tied to the new requirements, and, as always, remain committed to serving our customers.”

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • TechieTwo
    It's 100% the responsibility of the shipper to complete all importation info. to comply with the Customs laws of a given country. This is nothing new and is required for all countries.
    Reply
  • ggeeoorrggee
    TechieTwo said:
    It's 100% the responsibility of the shipper to complete all importation info. to comply with the Customs laws of a given country. This is nothing new and is required for all countries.
    Somewhat misleading. It is the responsibility of the receiving entity in the destination country to pay tariffs. Compliance with customs laws (i.e. legalities regarding the import the product in its form) has little to do with tariff costs or, as is possibly the case here, UPS’s service fees for collecting tariffs.

    What UPS is likely doing is destroying packages that the receiver refuses due to the tariff, the fees UPS charges to collect said tariffs, or the seller won’t take the product back (likely because they’ve already got their money).

    An international seller is in no way responsible for ensuring that domestic tariffs are even mentioned in a sale, let alone charged and paid any more than a U.S. seller is responsible for taxes on interstate sales — assuming they do not have a presence in the destination — or VAT on European sales.
    Reply
  • bill001g
    ggeeoorrggee said:
    Somewhat misleading. It is the responsibility of the receiving entity in the destination country to pay tariffs. Compliance with customs laws (i.e. legalities regarding the import the product in its form) has little to do with tariff costs or, as is possibly the case here, UPS’s service fees for collecting tariffs.

    What UPS is likely doing is destroying packages that the receiver refuses due to the tariff, the fees UPS charges to collect said tariffs, or the seller won’t take the product back (likely because they’ve already got their money).

    An international seller is in no way responsible for ensuring that domestic tariffs are even mentioned in a sale, let alone charged and paid any more than a U.S. seller is responsible for taxes on interstate sales — assuming they do not have a presence in the destination — or VAT on European sales.
    That seems to be only 1 of the complaints. It seems more the receiver would pay the fees and taxes but the shipper incorrectly filled the import paperwork out. Not surprising when you consider how many categories and sub categories customs has and some there is lot of dispute over what you place them in when they can go in multiple. All kinds of people try to use the wrong codes intentionally to import stuff they are not allowed to.

    Give it a year and all that will be left is the complaining about how expensive it is to import not that shipments are getting stuck.
    Reply
  • ggeeoorrggee
    bill001g said:
    That seems to be only 1 of the complaints. It seems more the receiver would pay the fees and taxes but the shipper incorrectly filled the import paperwork out. Not surprising when you consider how many categories and sub categories customs has and some there is lot of dispute over what you place them in when they can go in multiple. All kinds of people try to use the wrong codes intentionally to import stuff they are not allowed to.

    Give it a year and all that will be left is the complaining about how expensive it is to import not that shipments are getting stuck.
    Agreed. The entire tariff policy effort has been poorly planned and rolled out with the precision of an avalanche.
    Reply
  • chaos215bar2
    ggeeoorrggee said:
    Agreed. The entire tariff policy effort has been poorly planned and rolled out with the precision of an avalanche.
    Heh, I've literally seen avalanches more precise than this policy.
    Reply