Asus Brings Its Tinker Board To North America

News
By
Published
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Steven Lynch
Contributor

Steven Lynch is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering case reviews and news.

14 Comments Comment from the forums
  • Tech_TTT
    Why not Snapdragon 835?

    The Raspberry Pi is low specs ..

    and now this is low specs ..

    we want top of the line ARM CPU board PLEASE
    Reply
  • gggplaya
    Can I do a samba server with TinkerOS?
    Reply
  • cryoburner
    19585528 said:
    Why not Snapdragon 835?

    The Raspberry Pi is low specs ..

    and now this is low specs ..

    we want top of the line ARM CPU board PLEASE

    The Snapdragon 835 apparently costs almost $50 on its own, so they clearly couldn't put something like that in a device around this price level.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    19585528 said:
    we want top of the line ARM CPU board PLEASE
    You'll do a bit better with one of these:

    http://www.hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G145457216438
    Still A53 cores, I know, but a fair bit faster than the Pi 3 and similarly priced.

    http://www.96boards.org/products/
    These are more expensive, but you can get:■8x A53:
    http://www.96boards.org/product/hikey/
    ■2x A72 + 4x A53 + 4x A53:
    http://www.96boards.org/product/mediatek-x20/
    ■4x A57 in the form of AMD's Opteron A1100:
    http://www.96boards.org/product/cello/

    AMD is supposed to release the K12, this year. No clue what socket it'll use. If it's big enough, maybe Naples'. Otherwise, it'd be cool if they went with AM4.

    Anyway, I gave up on ARM, for the time being. I just bought an ASRock J4205-ITX to replace my Pi-based micro-server.

    http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/J4205-ITX/index.us.asp

    Sure, it burns more power than a Pi, but I can use a mainstream distro, I have a wide selection of cases (though I'd rather it were NUC/mini-STX form factor), and the graphics are fully-supported via both opensource and binary blob driver stacks. As for performance, it seems comparable to a similarly-clocked Core2 quad.

    Maybe its replacement will be an ARM-based mini-ITX (or mini-STX). I thought it'd have happened by now, but I guess I was off by a couple years.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    19585943 said:
    Can I do a samba server with TinkerOS?
    To the extent it's a fairly standard Debian distro, yes. I'm running Samba on my 1st generation Pi. Also miniDLNA, for streaming (not quite fast enough for video, thus my upgrade).
    Reply
  • Tech_TTT
    19586603 said:
    19585528 said:
    we want top of the line ARM CPU board PLEASE
    You'll do a bit better with one of these:

    http://www.hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G145457216438
    Still A53 cores, I know, but a fair bit faster than the Pi 3 and similarly priced.

    http://www.96boards.org/products/
    These are more expensive, but you can get:■8x A53:
    http://www.96boards.org/product/hikey/
    ■2x A72 + 4x A53 + 4x A53:
    http://www.96boards.org/product/mediatek-x20/
    ■4x A57 in the form of AMD's Opteron A1100:
    http://www.96boards.org/product/cello/

    AMD is supposed to release the K12, this year. No clue what socket it'll use. If it's big enough, maybe Naples'. Otherwise, it'd be cool if they went with AM4.

    Anyway, I gave up on ARM, for the time being. I just bought an ASRock J4205-ITX to replace my Pi-based micro-server.

    http://www.asrock.com/mb/Intel/J4205-ITX/index.us.asp

    Sure, it burns more power than a Pi, but I can use a mainstream distro, I have a wide selection of cases (though I'd rather it were NUC/mini-STX form factor), and the graphics are fully-supported via both opensource and binary blob driver stacks. As for performance, it seems comparable to a similarly-clocked Core2 quad.

    Maybe its replacement will be an ARM-based mini-ITX (or mini-STX). I thought it'd have happened by now, but I guess I was off by a couple years.

    I need it small and fast to use in DIY Robots Projects and DIY portable game consoles projects ... we need the fastest we can get.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    19587070 said:
    I need it small and fast to use in DIY Robots Projects and DIY portable game consoles projects ... we need the fastest we can get.
    Fast ain't a problem. And small? No problem. It'll cost you, though.

    https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded-computing


    In other news, the Goldmont-based Up^2 should start shipping in days: http://www.up-board.org/upsquared/

    If you can trade some speed for size: http://www.up-board.org/upcore/

    The original has been shipping for a while. Like Core, it's Silvermont-based: http://www.up-board.org/up/

    For robotics, the x5-z8350 in Up and Up Core has 192 GFLOPS of fp32 compute power, making it probably the best tradeoff. Its cell phone-oriented CPU is also probably the most efficient. Sure, the Up^2 is faster, but you'll pay for it both in $ and in W.

    Again, if you need to go cheaper, then the Odroid-C2 is worth a look.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I almost got the Up^2 to replace my Pi. Then, I realized that for its price, I could put together a full system (except SSD) around the ASRock J4205-ITX and went that route. It's a shame, because I really wanted something smaller than mini-ITX, but at least I got a few hundred extra MHz and more features on that board.
    Reply
  • Tech_TTT
    19586023 said:
    19585528 said:
    Why not Snapdragon 835?

    The Raspberry Pi is low specs ..

    and now this is low specs ..

    we want top of the line ARM CPU board PLEASE

    The Snapdragon 835 apparently costs almost $50 on its own, so they clearly couldn't put something like that in a device around this price level.

    I will gladly pay $30 more if they put this CPU instead of theirs :)
    Reply
  • Tech_TTT
    19587324 said:
    19587070 said:
    I need it small and fast to use in DIY Robots Projects and DIY portable game consoles projects ... we need the fastest we can get.
    Fast ain't a problem. And small? No problem. It'll cost you, though.

    https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded-computing


    In other news, the Goldmont-based Up^2 should start shipping in days: http://www.up-board.org/upsquared/

    If you can trade some speed for size: http://www.up-board.org/upcore/

    The original has been shipping for a while. Like Core, it's Silvermont-based: http://www.up-board.org/up/

    For robotics, the x5-z8350 in Up and Up Core has 192 GFLOPS of fp32 compute power, making it probably the best tradeoff. Its cell phone-oriented CPU is also probably the most efficient. Sure, the Up^2 is faster, but you'll pay for it both in $ and in W.

    Again, if you need to go cheaper, then the Odroid-C2 is worth a look.

    Thanks for the info , I like the nvidia board . :)
    Reply