5 Ways Facebook Could Use Oculus Rift

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jane McEntegart
Contributor

Jane McEntegart is a writer, editor, and marketing communications professional with 17 years of experience in the technology industry. She has written about a wide range of technology topics, including smartphones, tablets, and game consoles. Her articles have been published in Tom's Guide, Tom's Hardware, MobileSyrup, and Edge Up.

  • Alec Mowat
    1. They could run the company into the ground.2. ........
    Reply
  • ferooxidan
    2. I could finally meet Jane virtually
    Reply
  • ferooxidan
    2. I could finally meet Jane virtually
    Reply
  • g-unit1111
    Farmville: Now with all the sights, sounds, and even smells of an actual farm! :lol:
    Reply
  • clonazepam
    Oh it'll be fine.On a more humorous note:I'm gonna shave one leg, lay in bed, rub my legs together, and it'll feel like my dream woman is really there!!!
    Reply
  • jankeke
    As much as I dislike FB, I really don't think the Occulus Rift is in some sort of danger of becoming what many fear.Some developers will devolop games, other wil develop social stuff and others will develop stuff no one even thought about. In that, nothing changes.And if with FB's $, the Occulus Rift comes to the consumer earlier (with the quality originally intended, of course), I can't say I'm against it.
    Reply
  • nitrium
    Talking to each other via a Skype like tech obviously makes zero sense if BOTH participants are wearing the goggles - since you'd be looking at each other wearing said goggles. I'm not sure about you lot, but I prefer to look someone in the eyes when I'm talking to them - not with half their face covered by impenetrable goggles.
    Reply
  • tomfreak
    thing device is still bulky.
    Reply
  • house70
    12980748 said:
    Talking to each other via a Skype like tech obviously makes zero sense if BOTH participants are wearing the goggles - since you'd be looking at each other wearing said goggles. I'm not sure about you lot, but I prefer to look someone in the eyes when I'm talking to them - not with half their face covered by impenetrable goggles.

    +1000. Same goes for the so-called medical applications as described here, as well as the business ones; as long as the person's face is half-covered by these goggles any attempt to do a face-to-face is just as ridiculous as that poor Photoshop job in the first pic.
    Reply
  • Menigmand
    i'm one of the people who get a bad taste in the mouth seeing Facebook buy Oculus, but I find it a bit difficult to explain why. I think it's because I don't like everything to be interconnected - I want to keep my Facebook account and my gaming time separate. I don't want to be datamined while playing games. And I don't want ads or micropayments in my games.
    Reply