Windows 11 at Launch: You Don't Need to Upgrade Yet

Windows 11
(Image credit: Microsoft)

Back in 2015, the idea of Windows 11 seemed crazy. Windows 10 released that summer, and it certainly appeared that Microsoft was moving to an update-only approach. But six years later, Windows 11 is here with a fresh coat of paint that is sure to be divisive.

Windows 11 is an attempt at modernizing Windows for an era where more people work from home (or in a hybrid model). It's one that aims to work across form factors, whether you’re on a touch-centric device or one that’s keyboard and mouse only. . It's a design that hopes to capitalize on the resurgence of the PC as people purchase more of them to be productive wherever they are.

At this point, you're likely one of five people:

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Jake Hall
    Predictable Microsoft. Every other OS is junk
    Reply
  • hotaru.hino
    Jake Hall said:
    Predictable Microsoft. Every other OS is junk
    Nah, the only version out of the box that was "perfect" was 7. And it was only "perfect" because it was really just Windows Vista SP2 with a shiny new taskbar and some other under the hood features that got backported to Vista.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    The question becomes how heavy handed will Microsoft be at attempting to force Windows 11 onto Windows 10 users. Something tells me they won't learn from their GWX fiasco and I'll bet they start pushing, at a minimum, nag screens and nag prompts onto Windows 10 users as soon as Windows 2H21 is released.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    hotaru.hino said:
    Nah, the only version out of the box that was "perfect" was 7. And it was only "perfect" because it was really just Windows Vista SP2 with a shiny new taskbar and some other under the hood features that got backported to Vista.

    Disagree. Windows 2000, in my experience, was rock solid from the start because it was so stripped down with a focus on stability.
    Reply
  • Jake Hall
    Windows 2000: 👍
    Windows ME: 👎
    Windows XP:👍
    Windows Vista: 👎
    Windows 7: 👍👍👍
    Windows 8:👎
    Windows 10:👍

    I'm gonna wait for Windows 12 LOL
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Jake Hall said:
    Windows 2000: 👍
    Windows ME: 👎
    Windows XP:👍
    Windows Vista: 👎
    Windows 7: 👍👍👍
    Windows 8:👎
    Windows 10:👍

    I'm gonna wait for Windows 12 LOL
    Anyone that gives XP a thumbs up is looking through rose colored glasses.

    You forget the total ridicule for the interface when we first saw it onscreen.
    It wasn't until SP2 that it was actually usable and stable.
    Reply
  • hotaru.hino
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Disagree. Windows 2000, in my experience, was rock solid from the start because it was so stripped down with a focus on stability.
    Considering Wikipedia lists mostly features added to it (and it's a lot of features), doesn't seem to list any notable features removed, and the fact it had four service packs, I'm going to have to disagree with it was "stripped down for stability"

    I mean compared to its "home version" Windows Me, it was certainly rock solid.
    Reply
  • randomizer
    Microsoft has already committed to supporting Windows 10 through October 14, 2025.

    Microsoft's support committments aren't worth much after Microsoft decided to stop supporting hardware on Windows 8.1 that was previously supported, and during the mainstream support period too.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    hotaru.hino said:
    I mean compared to its "home version" Windows Me, it was certainly rock solid.
    "Better than WinMe" is a very low bar to pass.
    Reply
  • svan71
    The ridiculous "Recommend" menu needs to be 95% smaller if not gone entirely .
    Reply