Nettop Round-Up: Four Tiny PCs, Benchmarked And Reviewed
We're testing four nettops: Arctic Cooling’s MC001-BD, ASRock’s CoreHT 252B, Giada’s i50, and Zotac’s Zbox AD03BR-PLUS. All of these tiny, quiet systems take a very different approach to compact computing, and we fill you in on what makes them unique.
Test Systems And Benchmarks
These are very different systems with varying target markets. We need to compare performance though, so we’re putting them through a battery of tests that allow us to compare their strengths and weaknesses. We’re even benchmarking a bit of light gaming.
Header Cell - Column 0 | ASRock Core100HT-BD | Giada i50 B5541 | Arctic MC001-BD | Zotac ZBOX AD03BR-Plus |
---|---|---|---|---|
CPU | Intel Core i5-2520M (Sandy Bridge), Dual-Core, Hyper-Threaded 2.5 GHz (3.1 Turbo), 3 MB L3 Cache | Intel Core i3-430UM (Arrandale), Dual-Core, Hyper-Threaded 1.2 GHz (1.73 Turbo), 3 MB L3 Cache | Intel Atom D525(Pineview-D) Dual-Core, Hyper-Threaded 1.8 GHz, 1 MB L2 Cache | AMD E-350(Zacate) Dual-Core, 1.6 GHz, 1 MB L2 Cache |
Networking | Realtek RTL8111E Gigabit Network Adapter (LAN)Atheros AR9287 2T2R wireless card (Wi-Fi) | Realtek RTL8111E Gigabit Network Adapter (LAN)Azurewave AW-NB037H(Wi-Fi, Bluetooth) | Realtek RTL8111E Gigabit Network Adapter (LAN)Ralink RT3070L 802.11 b/g/n PCIe card (Wi-Fi) | Realtek RTL8111DL Gigabit Network Adapter (LAN)Atheros AR9287 2T2R wireless card (Wi-Fi) |
Memory | Asint PC3-10700, 2 x 2 GB, 665 MHz, CL 9-9-9-24-1T(dual-channel) | Kingston PC3-107001 x 4 GB, 400 MHz, CL 6-6-6-15-1T(single-channel) | Nanya PC3-10700, 2 x 2 GB, 399 MHz, CL 6-6-6-15-2T(single-channel) | Samsung PC3-107001 x 2 GB, 533 MHz, CL 9-9-9-24-1T (single-channel) |
Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Integrated, shared RAM) | Intel HD Graphics (Integrated, shared RAM) | Mobility Radeon HD 5430 (512 MB dedicated RAM) | Radeon HD 6310 (Integrated, shared RAM) |
Sound | Analog & Optical:Realtek ALC892HDMI:Intel Display Audio | Analog & Optical:Realtek ALC662 HDMI:Intel Display Audio | Analog & Optical:Realtek ALC892 HDMI:AMD HD Audio | Analog & Optical:Realtek ALC888 HDMI:AMD HD Audio |
Hard Drive | Western Digital Scorpio Black500 GB, 7200 RPM, 16 MB cache, SATA 3Gb/s | Seagate Momentus 7200.4500 GB, 7200 RPM, 16 MB cache, SATA 3Gb/s | Hitachi Travelstar 7K500 500 GB, 7200 RPM, 16 MB cache, SATA 3Gb/s | Samsung Spinpoint 250 GB, 5400 RPM, 8 MB cache, SATA 3Gb/s |
Software and Drivers | ||||
Operating System | Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit | |||
DirectX version | DirectX 11 | |||
Graphics Drivers | Intel HD Graphics 15221, AMD Catalyst Control Center 11.7 |
Benchmark Configuration | |
---|---|
PCMark 7 | Total System Score, Memories, TV And Movies, Gaming, Music, Communications, Productivity, Hard Disk |
SiSoft Sandra 2011 | CPU Arithmetic, CPU Multi-Media, Memory Bandwidth, Network Bandwidth, and Network Latency benchmarks |
HD HQV Benchmark | Blu-ray, Version 2.0 |
Game Configuration | |
---|---|
StarCraft II | Version 1.4.0, Low Settings, Medium Textures, Tom's Hardware Guide Benchmark v2 |
Left 4 Dead 2 | Version: 20.8.7, Lowest settings, model/texture level to medium, multicore rendering enabled |
World of WarCraft | Version 4.2.2.14545, Fair graphics setting, FRAPS runs |
Current page: Test Systems And Benchmarks
Prev Page Giada i50 B5541 Next Page Benchmark Results: SyntheticsStay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
-
jdwii MISTAKEReply
But at $504 with no operating system (and $399 for a version without an operating system, hard drive, or memory),
-
Pyree IDK, $800 for the ASRock CoreHT 252B. A laptop cost less, has better performance for that price range, better mobility and space saving plus you have everything (screen, speaker etc). I rather get a laptop for a small office.Reply -
chumly These all seem expensive to me, considering you could probably build a better mini itx slim form factor system from scratch for about half the price.Reply -
molo9000 Nettops? These things are far too expensive to be nettops.Reply
They are small form factor PCs or home theatre PCs, but they are not nettops.
btw: Mac mini should be in this lineup. -
amk-aka-Phantom Very nice article. I was about to request something like it :)Reply
Mac Mini should be in this lineup? Actually, a good idea. I'd love to see how it compares to similar Wintel boxes.
I'm through with these small boxes because they're a pain in the a$$ to service and the hardware isn't good for the price ($800?! gimme a break!), but I see value in them for people who are ready to pay more for the small size.
If I would build a small form-factor box myself, I'd use something like this new Lian Li case which was in Tom's news recently - it can fit proper PCI/PCI-E cards.
Again, lovely article. Keep it up.
P.S. The ASRock box is great. -
compton I second the sentiment that these aren't really nettops. Luckily, the next iteration of Llano should rectify that, creating the golden triangle of CPU , GPU, and low cost. At least that's what I expect anyway. These reviewed units are more HTPC solutions than low cost nettop. Intel has a new half height miniITX initiative with a rare and relatively expensive 1155 mini ITX to match. However, once Intel's iGPU gets a serving of HTPC friendly features, you could build your own full featured, passively cooled system to take these units on performance and price as well. The move to 22nm should make low powered passively cooled CPUs easy to get right. As it stands, each of the solutions tested are pretty good, but I'm not sure that any of them are worth the asking price. In particular, I've always avoided Atom like the plague, and I don't think they're appropriate in small form factor systems that cost more than about $200.Reply -
ruban71 Can we now have a comparison against a couple of ITX builds? Choose an nice looking case and show us what can be put together for similar money.Reply -
I've owned an E350 - struggles with HD playback in a linux system, there doesn't appear to be any support for the amd hardware decoding. So if you were thinking of making a linux htpc out of it, go for something more powerful... It will perform better though as in the article above if using Windows (Using I think - Media Player classic which allows hardware h.264 decode.)Reply