Our goal is to demonstrate real-world gaming environments. With that in mind, we chose to test at high detail settings and a resolution of 1920x1080. We're including a Core i5-2500K operating at 4 GHz in order to measure to see if these lower-priced models compare favorably to a higher-end overclocked processor.
Testing LGA 1155-, AM3+-, and FM1-based processors requires three separate platforms. Our trio takes advantage of the same memory and storage subsystem in order to factor out those variables. All test systems employ the fastest single-GPU graphics card available, AMD's Radeon HD 7970. Yes, we realize the $550 choice is unrealistic in a budget-oriented configuration. However, our intention is eliminating potential bottlenecks, and the 7970 helps flesh out each processor's merits.
Our Socket FM1-equipped system centers on Asus' F1A75-V Pro, a full-sized ATX version of the F1A75-M Pro that provided top performance in our A75-based motherboard round-up.
The Socket AM3+-based machine employs Biostar's TA990FXE motherboard, which features the 990FX chipset. It recently proved itself a capable overclocker in our recent System Builder Marathon.
This comparison's LGA 1155 platform is built on Asus’ P8P67 Pro, a board that proved to be the best overclocker in one of our P67 motherboard round-ups.
We weren't able to find an FX-4100 in stock in time for this piece, so we simulate that chip using an FX-6100. By disabling a single Bulldozer module (two integer cores) in the Asus board's firmware, we create the same configuration as the cheaper chip, except for its operating frequency. The FX-4100 runs at 3.6 GHz, but can reach 3.8 GHz via Turbo Core. Since we're unable to manually specify the upper and lower limits for this CPU, though, we set it to run at a constant 3.8 GHz. In theory, this gives our simulated processor a 200 MHz advantage in heavily-threaded workloads. However, that shouldn't apply to most gaming environments. And since this model is unlocked, every FX-4100 can be reliably forced to this clock speed anyway.
|Interface||Socket FM1||Socket AM3+||LGA 1155|
AMD A4-3400 (Llano) 2.7 GHz
AMD Athlon II X4 631 (Llano) 2.6 GHz
AMD A8-3870K (Llano) 3.0 GHz
AMD Athlon II X3 455 (Rana) 3.3 GHz
AMD Athlon II X4 645 (Propus) 3.1 GHz
AMD Phenom II X4 955 (Deneb) 3.2 GHz
AMD Phenom II X4 980 (Deneb) 3.7 GHz
AMD FX-4100 (Zambezi) 3.6 GHz Base, 3.8 GHz Turbo Core
AMD FX-6100 (Zambezi) 3.3 GHz Base, 3.9 GHz Turbo Core
AMD FX-8120 (Zambezi) 3.1 GHz Base, 3.4 GHz Turbo Core
|Intel Pentium G630 (Sandy Bridge) 3.0 GHz|
Intel Pentium G860 (Sandy Bridge) 2.7 GHz
Intel Core i3-2100 (Sandy Bridge) 3.1 GHz
Intel Core i5-2400 (Sandy Bridge)3.1 GHz Base, 3.4 GHz Turbo Boost
Intel Core i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge) Overclocked to 4.0 GHz
Asus F1A75-V Pro
|Asus P8P67 Pro|
Chipset: Intel P67
|Networking||On-board Gigabit LAN controller|
AMD Radeon HD 7970
Western Digital Caviar Black 750 GB
ePower EP-1200E10-T2 1200 W
|Software and Drivers|
|Operating System||Microsoft Windows 7 x6, Service Pack 1, KB2645594 and KB2646060 installed|
AMD Radeon HD 7970 Win 7 x64 Driver, 1/9/2012
|Metro 2033||Version 220.127.116.11, Built-In Benchmark|
|Battlefield 3||Version 18.104.22.168, Operation Swordbreaker, FRAPS runs|
|Elder Scrolls V:|
|Version 22.214.171.124, FRAPS runs|
|DiRT 3||Version 126.96.36.199, Built-In Benchmark|
|Just Cause 2||Version 188.8.131.52, Concrete Jungle Benchmark|
|StarCraft 2||Version: 184.108.40.20641, Tom's Hardware Guide Benchmark|
- Can FX, APUs, And Pentium Processors All Game?
- Test System And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
- Benchmark Results: Battlefield 3
- Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2
- Benchmark Results: StarCraft II
- Benchmark Results: DiRT 3
- Benchmark Results: Metro 2033
- Overclocking Benchmarks
- AMD Or Intel: Which Offers Better Gaming Performance?