- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (95) |
- Share
Let's start off by looking at the major specifications of the new GeForce GT 220 and 210 graphics cards:
| GT 220 | G210 | |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Designation | GT216 | GT218 |
| Fabrication Process | 40 nm | |
| Graphics Clock (Texture and ROP units) | 625 MHz | 589 MHz |
| Processor Clock (Shader Units) | 1,360 MHz | 1,402 MHz |
| Memory Clock (Clock Rate/Data Rate) | 790 MHz (1,580 MHz effective) DDR3 1,012 MHz (2,024 MHz effective) GDDR3 | 500 MHz (1,000 MHz effective) DDR2 |
| Total Video Memory | 1GB, 512MB | 512MB |
| Memory Interface | 128-bit | 64-bit |
| Total Memory Bandwidth | 25.3 GB/s (DDR3) 32.4 GB/s (GDDR3) | 8 GB/s (DDR2) |
| Stream Processors | 48 | 16 |
| ROP units | 8 | 4 |
| Texture Filtering Units | 16 | 8 |
| Microsoft DirectX/Shader model | 10.1/4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.2 | |
| PhysX Ready | Yes | No (not enough cores for useful acceleration) |
| Video Format Support for GPU Decode Acceleration | MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 Advanced Simple Profile, H.264, VC1, WMV, DivX version 3.11 and later | |
| HD Digital Audio over PCI Express | Yes | |
| Connectors | DVI, VGA, HDMI | |
| Form Factor | Single-Slot | |
| Power Connectors | None | |
| HDMI version | 1.3a | |
| DisplayPort | 1.1 | |
| Dual Link HDCP | Yes | |
| Bus Support | PCIe 2.0 | |
| Max Board power | 58 Watts | 30.5 Watts |
| GPU Thermal Threshold | 105 degrees C | |
Because these new cards are both based on the same GT200 architecture underlying the GeForce GTX 260/275/280/285/295, we won't scrutinize the minutia too much. Rather, we'll concentrate on what makes these new cards different. For details on GT200 itself, check out our GeForce GTX 280 article here.
For a quick refresh, the GeForce GTX 285 has 10 texture-processing clusters (TPCs) with 24 individual streaming processors (SPs) or cores in each one. Each TPC also has eight texture management units (TMUs). There are eight 64-bit raster-operator partitions (ROPs), each capable of handling eight operations per clock. As a result, the GeForce GTX 285 sports a total of 240 processor cores, 80 TMUs, and eight ROPs capable of handling 64 pixels per clock, with all of the ROPs contributing to a 512-bit memory bus.

The GT216 GPU in the GeForce GT 220, on the other hand, has only two of these TPCs, each containing 24 SPs for a total of 48 processor cores. Like the GeForce GTX 280, each TPC has eight TMUs, for a total of 16 TMUs. Two 64-bit ROPs capable of handling four pixels per clock work together to give the GPU a 128-bit memory interface and the capacity to handle eight raster operations per clock. Knowing this, we can expect the GT 220 to wield about one-fifth the processing power of the GeForce GTX 285.

The GT218 GPU in the GeForce 210 is significantly smaller, with a single TPC armed with 16 processor cores and eight TMUs in total. Raster operations are handled by a single 64-bit ROP capable of handling four pixels per clock. The end result is that the GeForce 210 should be approximately one-third as powerful as the GT 220.
These new GPUs weren't designed by copying and pasting the GT200's transistors, so Nvidia's engineers added some new tricks in the process: DirectX 10.1 and Shader Model 4.1 support, an integrated audio controller supporting eight-channel LPCM audio output, and enhanced playback support for DivX, VC-1, MPEG-2, and even flash-based video streams.
Perhaps more important, these new GPUs are manufactured on TSMC's 40nm process and represent Nvidia's first 40nm commercial GPUs. This is an important milestone because, assuming good yields, this should allow Nvidia to produce more of these GPUs per die, and therefore, per dollar.
- 1 / 5
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- What was your first CPU ?
- which P4 2buy when Northwood's not available?
- Power requirement for HDs
- Dose AMD 64 make up for GPU
- NVIDIA's Gelato: Hardware-accelerated renderer!!
- How Far can i push my System (Pentium D 945 3.4ghz)
- Overclock Athlon 5200 HELP PLEASE
- Overclocking the 3500+(Socket 939)
- new to overclocking
- E4300 OC settings being reset on reboot
- Dell Vostro 220 ram upgrade
- The Southbridge Battle: nforce 6 MCP vs. ICH7 vs. ICH8
- Asus A8V, Did I make a mistake?
- GA 7VRXP AND IT ROCKS
Related articles
-
In the ’CPU against graphics card’ test, it’s clear that the GeForce 9600 GT is well-served by a 2.4 GHz to 3.2 GHz processor. In the following evaluations it has been allowed access to a 3.47 GHz overclocked model, which it is able to utilize in a...
-
The number of driver versions between the last test and the current beta drivers is greater for the GeForce 9600 GT. However, the 175.16, 175.19 (GeForce 9), 177.39 and 177.41 (GeForce GTX) came out in quick succession. Many of the changes affected...
-
The following table lists the system power requirements when using several popular graphics cards. These results were obtained with a different motherboard than the one listed in our test setup, but the difference is clearly in the single-digit range...
Best offers
|
GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... | $559.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $214.95 PC Connection More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $129.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Radeon HD 4890 Cyclone OC Video Card... | $209.99 Directron More info |
|
Radeon HD 4870 Video Card (1GB,... | $166.86 PC Connection More info |
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Ray
Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
|
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|







Too late for nVidia. They should release these cards 1 year ago...
Soooo tiny itsy bitsy!
This is a nice article that points out nVidia's step into the development of 40nm chips for the market even though they didn't really cause any changes in the sub-$100 video card market. They just seemed to make it even more crowded. I can't wait for the GT300 reviews though.
They have a lot of loyal folks looking to save money these days, so they'll move some 220's. So fans will appreciate the cards.
hmmm i can see amd stomping this thing shortly with a DX11 part - kalliman is right, this is way too late in the market
as for the gt300 - also bad news if the info i have heard is correct - 6 months away is not good for nvidia
And to answer your question - No, it cannot play Crysis.
why do i feel like mac?
hmmm i can see amd stomping this thing shortly with a DX11 part - kalliman is right, this is way too late in the marketas for the gt300 - also bad news if the info i have heard is correct - 6 months away is not good for nvidia
The 210 220 i'm pretty sure are OEM parts this is more like a proof/test of what nvidia can do, then a market move. They are nothing more then media cards meant for random dell's/gateway random desktops for people who don't really know what's in their computers.
why do i feel like mac?
because they cant play crysis either?
The 210 220 i'm pretty sure are OEM parts this is more like a proof/test of what nvidia can do, then a market move. They are nothing more then media cards meant for random dell's/gateway random desktops for people who don't really know what's in their computers.
like nvidia 8300's and 9300's - never heard of them till i worked on a few HP's
This is the first time Tom's has run HAWX with DX10.1 support enabled. Those countless reviews with HD4xxx this support was not used. Does this imply something obvious?
The 210 220 i'm pretty sure are OEM parts this is more like a proof/test of what nvidia can do, then a market move.
They're retail now.
Check Newegg, they can be purchased already. Today is the official launch of the retail cards, although they've been available for a few days now.
I forgot to add that article writer seems not to have any idea what DX10.1 is all about when running HAWX without AA. Let me clarify: DX10.1 is about improving AA performance.
Well scrumworks,
Seeing as these cards cannot perform well on basic settings at low resolutions it would seem that enabling AA for these cards is a moot point.
Why do you keep making the same damn error? The 9600GSO/8800GS variant (96SP/192b) described is no longer being made. Only the 48SP/256b and 96SP/128b are available. Both are inferior to the original. At least make mention of this.
Why do you keep making the same damn error? The 9600GSO/8800GS variant (96SP/192b) described is no longer being made. Only the 48SP/256b and 96SP/128b are available. Both are inferior to the original. At least make mention of this.
I don't see the point of these cards, 9500GT have similar power and performance and costs less. 9600GT green version would have similar power output but twice the performance of GT220 so again it's getting pwned.
Fail!
"..the GT200 family's naming convention. Let's have a closer look at what they actually contain."
Oh touchè! ;-)
If only Nvidia have something to make consumen confuse like:
Pure Video HD 4
DX 11
If not than I thing I will buy 9600 GT. Thank you....