Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Signin with

Our Benchmarking Approach

by

Evaluating monitors isn't straightforward. No doubt, processors and graphics cards are much easier to review given our well-established suite of benchmarks. Often, before we even start talking about a given display, any debate about specific evaluation criteria gets lost in the discussion about how color behaves. That's why we aren't going to use test patterns that we need to measure with our eyes.

As a result, we're generation more objective performance analysis by using a spectrophotometer and monitor calibration software: specifically, a Spectracal-certified i1Pro, Spectracal's CalMan (luminance and gamut measurements), X-Rite's i1Match (default state), and ColorEyes Pro (calibration). This allows us to isolate specific traits, such as color space, luminance uniformity, and contrast ratios, without having to rely on subjective impressions. If you are unfamiliar with these terms, we'll explain the benchmarks as we start picking apart each monitor's performance characteristics.

If there are other benchmarks you'd like to see from a display roundup, let us know in this story's feedback thread. We'll try to accommodate your request in our next LCD roundup. In the meantime, our current set of benchmarks gives you a good idea of what to expect, whether you are gaming or just watching video on Hulu.

Share:
78
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
compton 07/13/2011 4:21 AM
Hide
--1+

I've put a Jihad out on TN panels. There are so many decent, cheap e-IPS panels out there. At their worst, eIPS screens are better than TN, and at their best comparable to much more expensive IPS units. There isn't really a reason to consider TNs anymore. It's bad enough that every laptop has a TN (except for a few 12" Lenovos), but why rape your precious eyeballs with a terrible TN on your desk? With that said, I look forward to monitor reviews, and this is a pretty good one.

acku 07/13/2011 4:34 AM
Hide
-7+

Point taken. The key is finding those good IPS panels. There are good IPS monitors and there are bad ones. In the same way, there are good and bad TNs.

I mean if we're breaking down everything down to tech...
VA are great at black
IPS are probably the best at color accuracy
IPS better at color shift resistance, but you get light bleed at angles.
TNs better than IPS for motion blur, IPS better than VA for motion blur
VA and IPS both suffer a bit from flashlighting and clouding effects
TNs don't have great color, but offer decent middle ground
TNs are dirt cheap
TNs generally have lower lags

Big generalization here. The point is that nothing is perfect. If it was, there would be little point to advance technologies. In the end, you pick your imperfection.

Cheers,
Andrew Ku
TomsHardware.com

Gamer-girl 07/13/2011 4:35 AM
Hide
-6+

How about 24"+ 1920x1200 monitors?

acku 07/13/2011 4:40 AM
Hide
-1+

Quote :

How about 24"+ 1920x1200 monitors?




I can do that. For whatever reason, I don't see that many 1920x1200 monitors. Most of the time I see 1920x1080.

Is there a particular reason that you prefer 1920x1200?

Cheers,
Andrew Ku
TomsHardware.com

clownbaby 07/13/2011 4:54 AM
Hide
-1+

+1 on 1920x1200 monitors.

"Is there a particular reason that you prefer 1920x1200?"
The extra desktop space really helps in my design workflow and adds quite a bit of space over 2 or 3 monitors.

soccerdocks 07/13/2011 4:57 AM
Hide
-3+

acku :
I can do that. For whatever reason, I don't see that many 1920x1200 monitors. Most of the time I see 1920x1080.Is there a particular reason that you prefer 1920x1200?Cheers,Andrew KuTomsHardware.com



I would also be interested in seeing some 1920x1200 monitors. The reason I prefer that resolution is I find that having that extra vertical space is very useful for productivity software, especially word documents. However, for gaming the resolution really doesn't matter to me.

acku 07/13/2011 5:34 AM
Hide
-0+

Quote :

I would also be interested in seeing some 1920x1200 monitors. The reason I prefer that resolution is I find that having that extra vertical space is very useful for productivity software, especially word documents. However, for gaming the resolution really doesn't matter to me.



Any specific monitors? The list is pretty short on 1920x1200.

anonymous 07/13/2011 5:41 AM
Hide
-3+

I agree with the above comments. I loath the 16:9 aspect ratio, and would really like to see some coverage of 4:3 or 16:10 monitors, which (IMO) are much more useful for doing work.

ksampanna 07/13/2011 5:49 AM
Hide
-0+

How about an eyefinity/surround test with a range of TN, IPS monitors across a range of budgets? I know this is pretty huge, but you are toms, so you should be able to easily pull it off.

Gamer-girl 07/13/2011 5:53 AM
Hide
-0+

The dell ultrasharp 24 inch mainly

revjacob 07/13/2011 6:03 AM
Hide
-1+

Yup. Gamer girl just beat me to it. Could you please do a review of E-IPS panels like Dell 2311H and LG IPS236V specially their response time in gaming. Thanks in advance.

legendkiller 07/13/2011 6:05 AM
Hide
-0+

I Would like to TomsHardware.COM to test Which monitor is the Best Monitor for Gaming and Video Editing like those $400(Or lower) range Monitor like the BenQ:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] -_-Product
AND this LG Monitor:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applica [...] CatId=4231

crisan_tiberiu 07/13/2011 6:20 AM
Hide
-0+

I have a Philips 222ELSB 21,5' TN monitor, and it is very good. I dont see Comptons point here with the Jihad on TN panels. Not everybody can aford a very expensive monitor

Gamer-girl 07/13/2011 6:23 AM
Hide
--3+

acku :
Is there a particular reason that you prefer 1920x1200?Cheers,Andrew KuTomsHardware.com



Because 2560x1600 monitors are too expensive lol and
I have large excel tables, multiple windows at the same time.
On the gaming side it would mean the difference seeing that guy on the right-hand corner of your screen and getting shot xD

fstrthnu 07/13/2011 6:25 AM
Hide
-0+

The Dell Ultrasharp U2410 runs at 1920x1200, I haven't checked any others. From what I've read, it's a pretty darn good IPS monitor.

acku 07/13/2011 6:44 AM
Hide
-0+

Quote :

Because 2560x1600 monitors are too expensive lol and
I have large excel tables, multiple windows at the same time.
On the gaming side it would mean the difference seeing that guy on the right-hand corner of your screen and getting shot xD



Point taken Gamer-girl. I'll call Dell up in the morning.

Cheers,
Andrew Ku
TomsHardware.com

Kamab 07/13/2011 6:50 AM
Hide
-0+

If you're reviewing white-LED backlit TN LCD displays could you try reviewing one of ASUS's monitors? They seem to have a decent line in their VH###H monitors for someone looking for a budget display, but it's hard to know.

And if not try a roundup of some H-IPS and e-IPS monitors. Seems like these are becoming affordable for people with 200 bucks to spend.

Gamer-girl 07/13/2011 7:07 AM
Hide
-0+

acku :
Point taken Gamer-girl. I'll call Dell up in the morning.Cheers,Andrew KuTomsHardware.com



Really is that all you have to do and they just send you one? Now i wanna work at Toms. lol

anonymous 07/13/2011 7:16 AM
Hide
-0+

There are lots of sites out there that show testing input lag using a CRT and the tested monitor both displaying the same image and taking pics with a high shutter speed. read here http://shoryuken.com/forum/index.p [...] faq.55593/ or here showing the testing procedures http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/sho [...] ?t=1166196

Best offers

All about Monitors

Newsletters


OK