Asus ROG Strix XG248QSG Ace 610 Hz gaming monitor review: A new frame rate frontier

It’s a 610 Hz 24-inch TN FHD panel with Adaptive-Sync, two kinds of ELMB blur reduction, HDR, and wide gamut color.

Reviews
By published
Asus XG248QSG
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

To read about our monitor tests in-depth, please check out Display Testing Explained: How We Test PC Monitors. We cover brightness and contrast testing on page two.

Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level

Image 1 of 3
Asus XG248QSG
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The XG248QSG has plenty of light output available, which is a good thing because it provides headroom for the ELMB feature and enhances the impact of HDR content. I measured almost 444 nits in SDR mode. You won’t get more output with dynamic dimming turned on, but that option deepens black levels to where they cannot be measured. To get a real-world result, I left it off and recorded a static contrast ratio of 960.5:1

After Calibration to 200 nits

Image 1 of 3
Asus XG248QSG
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Calibrating the XG248QSG was interesting because I had to increase the contrast slider to solve color clipping issues. That meant there was no change in the static ratio, it’s still around 960:1. You can get more contrast with dynamic dimming, but when measuring a black field pattern, the backlight is off, so I can’t get a value. The ANSI test also returned an average result of 886.8:1.

Comparing an OLED here is clearly unfair, but I included it because it’s close in price and speed to the XG248QSG and the other LCD screens.

Test Takeaway: If you want the highest possible frame rates, the XG248QSG provides that along with high brightness and excellent (for a TN LCD) contrast. It’s just under 1,000:1 natively, so it compares well with typical TN and IPS screens. But if image depth is more important to you than sheer speed, an OLED or VA panel is a better option.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

TOPICS
Christian Eberle
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

1 Comment Comment from the forums
  • Shiznizzle
    $1000 for a 1080p rectangle thing.

    Is it possible to tell the difference between 120 hz and 340 hz?

    Possibly, but i doubt it.

    How about from 340 to 610?

    My answer is no.

    If you say yes, then do a blind test and tell us which is which once there are enough 600 hz monitors on the market so you cant learn their color profiles and base your decision on that. Better yet. Do a black and white 600 hz test. Refresh rate is refresh rate so color should not matter. You clain to see the difference so tell us which one.

    What do you mean you cant see the difference between 610 and 472? Are you blind?

    We are now getting into the absurd levels of tech that not even humans can see the difference of.
    Reply