Transparent, Flexible 3D Memory Chips Could Replace Flash

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • It *could* replace flash, but I wager that some cheaper alternative without a few of the conferred benefits (like flexibility, resistance to water, and resistance to heat) will come along and that will be the dominant one that becomes available to consumers due to cheaper price for same capacity.

    See NOR flash vs NAND flash (or even within NAND flash itself, SLC vs. MLC), SRAM vs DRAM, and many more of the same sort of battle play out between a cheap technology and a more expensive but superior technology equivalent.
    Reply
  • lamorpa
    So this is the new future technology that will replace flash by 2017. Just like, "2004 when ... MRAM, OUM, PRAM or nanocrystal-supported flash would replace flash memory chips ... by 2009" I get it!
    Reply
  • jabliese
    lamorpaSo this is the new future technology that will replace flash by 2017. Just like, "2004 when ... MRAM, OUM, PRAM or nanocrystal-supported flash would replace flash memory chips ... by 2009" I get it!Exactly. Any new technology 5 years out you *might* see in 10 years. Anything 2 years out slips to 5 years. Anything beyond 5 years out slips into forever.
    Reply
  • freggo
    So we can use the Gorilla Glass of a smart phone as it's memory ?
    Cool; tablets will have quite some memory available then.

    Reply
  • annymmo
    This technology could be a survivor!!

    Sounds like it's going to be cheap and rugged!!
    Withstanding those high temperatures and hopefully high radiation is a nice bonus.

    THere are already microcontrollers and discrete chips with FRAM available.
    Fram is used in some areas!! But the article thing could be a breakthrough.

    @Melchior
    Materials don't work like that.
    You don't have cheaper and less features in a linear way.
    A cheaper material can have superior properties to a more expensive material.
    Factories then just use the cheaper because of competition.

    It's perfectly possible to have good and cheap materials or bad and expensive materials.
    Reply
  • alxianthelast
    I wonder if they will be rejected if implanted into the body by the immune system (johnny mnemonic style)

    "I'm carrying 3.2 Terabytes of data in my body."
    Reply
  • lamorpa
    alxianthelastI wonder if they will be rejected if implanted into the body by the immune system (johnny mnemonic style)"I'm carrying 3.2 Terabytes of data in my body."No. It's inert. (kind of obvious)
    Reply
  • __-_-_-__
    in other news SSD's prices still very high.
    Reply