China's 96-core x86 CPU taps chiplet design to rival AMD EPYC and Intel Xeon — 13 chiplets per processor provide up to 384 cores on a single motherboard, but no word on power consumption
Zhaoxin may not produce the best CPUs for gaming, but the leading Chinese fabless semiconductor enterprise is undoubtedly preparing to unleash a highly impressive server chip. Zhaoxin has unveiled its next-generation Kaisheng KH-50000 processors, which the company describes in its press release as "presenting a 'technological gift' on the eve of the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China."
The KH-50000 utilizes Zhaoxin's latest Century Avenue architecture, named after a famous road in Shanghai. The company is fond of naming its architectures after famous locations within Shanghai because, after all, Zhaoxin is a joint venture between VIA Technologies and the Shanghai government. Century Avenue is the current architecture used by the company for its mainstream KaiXian KX-7000 processors; consequently, it is logical for Zhaoxin to align its latest server processors accordingly. Although Century Avenue is an internally developed architecture by Zhaoxin, many speculate that Century Avenue derives from Centaur Technology's CNS core, prior to the company's split from VIA Technologies in 2021.
Zhaoxin utilizes a chiplet design for the KH-50000, similar to AMD's Ryzen and EPYC processors, with a greater emphasis on the latter, given the high number of cores. A chiplet design would enable Zhaoxin to push the core boundary on the KH-50000, effectively matching AMD's EPYC 9004 (codenamed Genoa) series that tops out at 96 cores. Zhaoxin has planned two variants of the KH-50000: the flagship 96-core SKU and a more affordable 72-core SKU, both of which lack simultaneous multithreading (SMT). The KH-50000 represents a monumental leap forward for Zhaoxin, as it provides 3X more cores than the company's existing KH-40000.
Zhaoxin's photograph of the KH-50000 reveals that the chipset layout exhibits minor differences from that of AMD; the core design remains consistent, however. The gargantuan I/O die is centrally positioned on the processor, encircled by four clusters of compute dies. Each cluster contains three compute dies, totaling twelve. Each die incorporates eight cores and 32MB of L3 cache. When assembled, the resulting processor comprises a 96-core configuration with 384MB of L3 cache.
Zhaoxin Kaisheng KH-50000 Specifications
Processor | Architecture | Cores / Threads | Base / Boost Clock (GHz) | L3 Cache (MB) | Memory Support | PCIe Lanes | SATA 3.2 Ports | USB Ports | Socket | Package Size (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KH-50000 | Century Avenue | 96 / 96 | 2.2 / 3.0 | 384 | 12 Channel DDR5-5200 | 128 PCIe 5.0 + 16 PCIe 4.0 | 12 | 4 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 | LGA | 72 x 76 |
KH-50000 | Century Avenue | 72 / 72 | 2.6 / 3.0 | 384 | 12 Channel DDR5-5200 | 128 PCIe 5.0 + 16 PCIe 4.0 | 12 | 4 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 | LGA | 72 x 76 |
KH-40000/32 | Yongfeng | 32 / 32 | 2.5 / N/A | 64 | 8 Channel DDR4-3200 | 128 PCIe 3.0 | 16 | 8 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 | LGA | 77.5 x 56.5 |
The clock speeds on the KH-50000 aren't too shabby and fall in line with what you'd expect from a server chip. The 96-core variant has a 2.2 GHz base clock and 3.0 GHz boost clock. Since the 72-core chip has fewer cores, Zhaoxin could push the base clock to 2.6 GHz but maintained the same boost clock.
Although the company has taken the wraps off the KH-50000, it didn't reveal the TDP or other power metrics for the upcoming server chip. The thing with a chiplet design is that Zhaoxin can effectively utilize older process nodes for the KH-50000. Sanctions don't hurt as much if you don't care about power consumption.
For comparison, AMD has historically kept its top EPYC chips around the 300-350W range, and that's with SMT. Nonetheless, the chipmaker has recently pushed the power envelope up to 500W, which is understandable when its EPYC processors are maxing out at 192 cores.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
In addition to core count, the KH-50000 advances the development of Chinese server processors. It now supports up to 12 channels of DDR5-5200 RAM, allowing for a maximum of 3TB of memory, in contrast to the 2TB supported by DDR4-3200 on the KH-40000. Zhaoxin has added Compute Express Link (CXL) interconnect support. Furthermore, the expansion capabilities of the KH-50000 have enjoyed an upgrade to include 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes and 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes, compared to the 128 PCIe 3.0 lanes available on the KH-40000.
The SATA and USB ports experienced a slight decrease in numbers when comparing the KH-50000 to the KH-40000. However, Zhaoxin has upgraded the latter to support the latest USB 3.2 Gen 2 specification.
The KH-50000 supports x86 32-bit and 64-bit instructions, including SSE4.2, AVX, and AVX2. Support for virtualization is also present. To adhere to China's security guidelines, the KH-5000 supports the country's proprietary SM2, SM3, and SM4 encryption standards. Notably, Zhaoxin has integrated National Technology's fourth-generation trusted computing chip (likely the NS350) beneath the KH-50000, where the contacts are situated. This chip meets the security requirements of China's GM/T 0012-2020 cryptographic module standard and complies with the international TPM 2.0 (SPEC 1.59) standard.
The footprint of the KH-50000 measures 72 x 76 mm, which is considerably larger than that of the KH-40000. Notably, it shares dimensions with AMD's Genoa and Bergamo processors, which measure 72 x 75.4 mm and are compatible with the socket SP5. Therefore, the size of the KH-50000 is precisely the same as that of AMD's more recent EPYC chips.
The KH-50000 slots into a socket with a Land Grid Array (LGA) design, meaning the pins are located on the motherboard rather than on the processor. Zhaoxin's latest server chips are scalable, similar to AMD's EPYC and Intel's Xeon chips. The KH-50000 embraces 2S and 4S systems, where you can accumulate up to 384 cores on the latter. Zhaoxin built its own ZPI (Zhaoxin Processor Interconnect) 5.0 for inter-chip communication.
Contrary to AI GPUs, companies in China can still acquire server chips without significant difficulty, albeit potentially at increased costs. Nonetheless, Zhaoxin continues to make considerable progress in the domestic market, and with Chinese authorities firmly committed to utilizing domestically produced technology, the company could achieve success even if the KH-50000 does not rival AMD or Intel's latest server chips.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
-
rluker5 If legit sure looks like someone struck a deal with AMD or TSMC.Reply
Not saying that is what it is, it just looks like that. -
Blacktie75 Reply
Considering China's initial breakthrough in chip architecture was literally AMD selling them the Zen architecture there's no doubt about that. You don't remember that drama but the US government decided it was still too far behind to be considered illegal? Google "AMD sells China the keys to the kingdom." All their chips are based off Zenrluker5 said:If legit sure looks like someone struck a deal with AMD or TSMC.
Not saying that is what it is, it just looks like that. -
JRStern Sounds good to me. No word on power, or process size - 14nm or larger? How about L1/L2 cache? I have these same questions about high core counts from AMD and Intel, now that they're going there again.Reply
I was doing big SQL Server database systems on the biggest Intel chips back around 2010, when Microsoft changed their licensing to per-core. Horrible decision! SQL Server can often benefit hugely from parallelism, but only needs it say 1/4 of the time, so you need a bunch of cores that you can save for low utilization - to you don't want to pay a full license fee for them. So what does Microsoft do now?
Also pretty much have to have your own on-premise system, unless Azure can guarantee you your own physical processor? A tuned multicore database system can be 100x faster than untuned (or 100x the transaction capacity), but on throttled VMs with just a handful of cores, good luck.
Anyway, these should serve China just fine, by the look of it.
... but just Googling, it looks like Microsoft still licenses by cores, so these things would incur heroic license fees ... if they use Microsoft and pay the full license fees. -
abufrejoval Reply
The way I read this, there is no Zen in this at all, apart from the EPYC inspiration on the chiplet approach.Blacktie75 said:Considering China's initial breakthrough in chip architecture was literally AMD selling them the Zen architecture there's no doubt about that. You don't remember that drama but the US government decided it was still too far behind to be considered illegal? Google "AMD sells China the keys to the kingdom." All their chips are based off Zen
Instead the cores are based on Centaur/VIA, IP they own, and do not require an AMD or Intel license to make or sell, even to the US, if anyone was interested.
Apart from that, all components also seem designed for domestic fabbing, so this is basically complete Chinese autonomy for x86 servers in case of an open war or similar.
And of course they can give these away to Russia or anyone else the US might want to cut off.
This isn't targeted (nor likely able) to compete with AMD or Intel in an open global market, but to provide sovereignty and independence, similar to what Russia tried with Elbrus.
But of course this is at a rather different level of performance and without emulation.
China also has chips based on AMD designs, but those need licenses and perhaps TMSC fabbing, no idea if that line continues in parallel. And of course there are even various domestic ISAs with their own use cases, but also not for competition on a global open market. They afford themselves a rather rich set of working alternatives, that I as a European, stuck in the middle and without any level of autonomy, find rather impressive...
...many years into the EU processor initiative and nothing to ready to run as far as I can tell. -
Geef Reply
Sadly, everything you have said is factually true.blitzkrieg316 said:<<Comment removed by moderator>>
I am however hoping it is false because another processor maker on the planet would be a big plus for everyone. Intel and AMD would have another reason to keep their chip prices in check. -
nookoool ReplyBlacktie75 said:Considering China's initial breakthrough in chip architecture was literally AMD selling them the Zen architecture there's no doubt about that. You don't remember that drama but the US government decided it was still too far behind to be considered illegal? Google "AMD sells China the keys to the kingdom." All their chips are based off Zen
Amd had some ip cooperation with hygon , not zhaoxin. -
Penfolduk Ironically, the restrictions on some US chips and the tariffs may be pushing China into accelerating it's "homegrown" market.Reply
Whether it be through genuine innovation or industrial espionage. -
Rabbit_AF I have a Zhaoxin KX-7000/8 system and it runs about as good as a first gen Ryzen 4C/8T. It can game, but the CPU does become a bottleneck. I have run Intel ARC on it, for ReBar is enabled on it. My motherboard is made by ASUS, so my motherboard gets BIOS updates that actually improve performance. I also have a Via Quadcore c4650, Centaur Technology CHA and Zhaoxin Z3-6540. My Zhaoxin 6540 isn't good at all, but the leap from the CHA to the KX-7000 is quite noticeable. I'm sure a 96 core will work just fine, though they need to fix some memory issues.Reply