Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Maximum thermal performance – noise-normalized to 38.9 dBA
This set of tests is designed to appeal to those who love quiet PCs, with both system fans and the CPU fan noise normalized to 38.9 dBA. Consider this a measure of the case’s thermal efficiency when noise levels are set to run quietly. This first set of benchmarks examines CPU performance.
With our first noise-normalized test, which stresses only the CPU, the performance was basically “average,” cooling 267.4W compared to an average of 268.8 across the 11 cases we’ve tested this way.
Our second test stresses both the CPU and GPU, to make the case as warm as possible. The added heat of the GPU reduces CPU performance slightly, from 267.4W down to 259.7W.
But let’s not forget: one of the distinguishing features of the BF360 Flow is its air scoop, which directs airflow directly to the GPU.
This engineering design isn’t just for looks – it performs especially well, with the case turning in the second-lowest GPU temperatures we’ve seen in this noise-normalized test. Of course, the large, thick intake fans themselves certainly help thermals all on their own.
Maximum Noise Levels
I measured the noise levels with my sound meter from one meter away from the computer case, with the pre-installed fans running at their maximum RPM speeds, recording a measurement of 46.6 dBA. Personally, I think that’s too loud. But in contrast to other cases on the market, the noise level is about average.
Maximum thermal performance – fans at full speed
Our noise-normalized results are designed for folks who prefer silence, but what if you don’t mind additional noise and just care about maximum performance?
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Allowing the fans to run at full speed increases CPU performance from 267W to 288W, an increase of about 8%. In contrast to the competition, the BF360 performed a little worse than others, but is only about 10W behind our best result.
Things look better, however, when we add the heat of a GPU to the test. Whereas many cases lose CPU cooling efficiency when the GPU’s heat is added, the impact on the BF360 Flow is almost non-existent. We measured 287.9W, with the HAVN case taking third place in this test.
And when it comes to GPU temperatures, the BF360 Flow shines. With a measurement of only 61.5C, HAVN’s case delivered the best graphics card temperatures we’ve seen in this test yet!
The temperature recorded was 61.8C, which is technically the best we’ve seen, though it is effectively tied (within margin of error) with Montech’s HS02 Pro case here.
One more thing
When HAVN sent along the BF360 Flow for testing, the company also included extra H18 fans. We wanted to see how much (or little) an additional fan might improve performance, and added an H18 exhaust fan above the CPU cooler. For the first test, we set a power limit of 150W for the CPU and also stressed the GPU (consuming 295W).


This test showed a three-degree improvement to CPU temperatures with the addition of an extra fan. GPU temperatures were technically 0.5C higher, but this is a “margin of error” difference, and both results are essentially on par with each other.
For the second test, we removed the power limits from the CPU. The same pattern emerged: slightly better CPU performance, with GPU temperatures essentially the same.


Conclusion
HAVN’s BF360 Flow delivers a highly effective approach to GPU cooling, made possible with its air-scoop intake design and massive 180mm fans. The case consistently produced some of the lowest GPU temperatures we’ve recorded, even outperforming many competitors built for high airflow.
Not everything is perfect with this case, though. The one-year warranty feels underwhelming for a case that’s priced above $150. And the lack of ARGB may limit its appeal to some gamers. But where it counts most, the BF360 Flow excels. Its subdued aesthetic, smart airflow engineering, and chart-topping GPU performance make it a compelling option for users prioritizing cool and consistent graphics card temperatures. If GPU thermals are a top priority, HAVN’s BF360 Flow stands out as one of the strongest options available today.
- 1
- 2
Current page: HAVN BF360 thermal and acoustic benchmarks
Prev Page HAVN BF360 Features and Specifications
Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.
-
Loadedaxe I’ve been eyeing their cases for a while now, but since I run mATX boards, their lineup doesn’t really work for me. I’m also not into having a giant case taking up half my desk.Reply
If they ever start making some smaller mATX options, they’ll definitely have my attention. -
SkyBill40 I'm interested in this case and it'll likely be the one I buy despite the testing here not falling quite in line with some of the others I've seen. it's also important to note that they didn't run the full setup of fans (don't know if that's on TH or HAVN for not sending enough), as HAVN recommends an intake on top and an exhaust to go along with the exhaust in the rear. That'd likely bring temps down a lot.Reply
As I'd begin by having this on the floor, the size really doesn't matter all that much to me but likely will to others. -
tennis2 Reply
The industry needs to move away from ATX. Really thought we were making headway on that 10 years ago, then it just kinda.....poof. Now it's even worse for mATX support.Loadedaxe said:I’ve been eyeing their cases for a while now, but since I run mATX boards, their lineup doesn’t really work for me. I’m also not into having a giant case taking up half my desk.
If they ever start making some smaller mATX options, they’ll definitely have my attention.
mATX is the perfect standard, 4 RAM slots, supports more than a 2-slot GPU, most of the time you still have 1 free expansion slot above or below the GPU, all the amenities of ATX, none of the unnecessary expansion slots.
Then just reserve mITX for small builds.
ATX is just an antiquated standard that hasn't been relevant in the consumer space for 15+ years. -
SkyBill40 Reply
If this were so, they'd have killed it off by now. Seems your opinion is just that.tennis2 said:ATX is just an antiquated standard that hasn't been relevant in the consumer space for 15+ years. -
tennis2 Reply
My 15 year comment was regarding the "death" of dual GPU consumer systems (SLI/Crossfire) and the turn of WiFi being widely used and included in the mobo instead of needing a WiFi card. But adoption is reliant on mobos AND cases.SkyBill40 said:If this were so, they'd have killed it off by now. Seems your opinion is just that.
mATX sits in an awkward middle-ground in terms of case size in a 3-size environment. Because of that, mATX has generally served as a "budget" market. Hard to let the market speak for itself when feature-parity is unbalanced and with such a large disparity of SKUs to choose from. That also affects economy-of-scale for mATX. So you just end up giving consumers 2 choices, mITX which does have sacrifices for some, or ATX which is more than what the vast majority needs/uses.
That being said, the recent trend toward >2 slot GPUs in the past 5-ish years is sure to affect something since mITX cases rarely offer >2 expansion slots, and if they do, they're 1 slot from being a mATX case.
Also seeing more people putting their case on TOP of their desks (which baffles me, but whatever), but that's also tough with ATX-or-ITX landscape if you have a >2-slot GPU.
In a logical world, mATX would be the most popular mobo/case size, and ATX and ITX would serve niche markets.....which is arguably opposite of the current situation. But again....we're not given a fair choice to make, so here we are. -
bit_user I was curious how these front fans compare to Noctua's current flagship 140 mm PWM model. While the current US price for these Nocuta fans is crazy (esp. for buying multiple of them), I think they do show what's technically possible in a 140x140x25 mm package.Reply
MetricHAVN H18Noctua NF-A14x25 PWM G2Dimensions180x180x40140x140x25Max Speed1200 RPM1500 RPMMax Airflow164.6 CFM91.6 CFMMax Static Pressure2.19 mm H202.56 mm H20Airflow per RPM per mm^24.23 x 10^-6 feet3.12 x 10^-6 feet
The last row is my attempt to get a sense of how efficient these fans are, relative to their speed and size. I didn't divide out the depth of each fan. If I do that, then Noctua comes out on top, with an efficiency of 1.24 x 10^-7 vs. HAVN's 1.06 x 10^-7. However, I think depth isn't nearly as proportional to airflow as area and RPMs generally are.
Also, keep in mind that this is based on each fan's claimed specs, yet we don't know how accurate those are nor how much airflow the HAVN fans would achieve through something like a case grille. HW Cooling has plenty of airflow measurements of the NF-A14x25 PWM G2 through various types & degrees of restriction, BTW. I didn't find any review of the HAVN fan, on their site. -
thestryker Reply
The case comes with 2x 180mm and 1x 140mm fans so that's how the main testing was done. If you scroll down you'll see the additional fan configuration tested which had moderate CPU temperature reductions.SkyBill40 said:it's also important to note that they didn't run the full setup of fans (don't know if that's on TH or HAVN for not sending enough), as HAVN recommends an intake on top and an exhaust to go along with the exhaust in the rear. That'd likely bring temps down a lot.
Unfortunately the market just was never really there for mATX. Going smaller became the shift for most enthusiasts who cared about size and the rest largely don't care about the small size difference between ATX and mATX. The rise of M.2 storage on desktop puts mATX at a clear disadvantage as it's limited to 3 slots. I do wish there were more quality options for mATX and sometimes there are decent lower-mid range boards, but the only high end one I can think of for a long time was the X670E Gene and it disappeared off the market very quickly.tennis2 said:The industry needs to move away from ATX. Really thought we were making headway on that 10 years ago, then it just kinda.....poof. Now it's even worse for mATX support. -
thestryker While the HAVN cases are interesting in general they're just not really competitive if you take into account cost. I do like their mechanical design and hope they keep bringing new ideas to the table. I just don't see why anyone would pick this case over say a Lian-li Lancool 217 for example unless the aesthetics really spoke to them.Reply -
call101010 Reply
Not true ... with GPU going three and four slots , they will cover the ATX space anyways and there is no point of wasting that space using mATX motherboard .tennis2 said:ATX is just an antiquated standard that hasn't been relevant in the consumer space for 15+ years.
Also , M2 slots need space and the more we have the better. ATX will be always the Enthusiast choice.
Actually it is the mATX that should be removed ... if you want small size go for mini ITX , and if you want more components , then full ATX ...,
why ? because all the slots on the mATX will be covered by the GPU anyways so it is as a mini ITX slotwise .. and 4 slots memory is also not needed , Overlockers use only 2 DIMMS.
Itx however gives you shorter depth and smaller size. so the mATX is the least wanted motherboard ...
The only scenario that micro ATX is better is for business PC where the GPU is small but you need extra slots for other hardware and at the same time smaller PC ...