Samsung 9100 Pro 8TB SSD review: Bigger, badder, and better

Finally, a large capacity high-end PCIe 5.0 SSD.

Samsung 9100 Pro 8TB SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Samsung 9100 Pro 8TB pushes the limit with the first large capacity, high-end Gen 5 drive. It delivers, but at a high price.

Pros

  • +

    8TB capacity

  • +

    High-end PCIe 5.0 performance

  • +

    Samsung name and support

Cons

  • -

    Very high MSRP

  • -

    Not the fastest drive

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

In response to Phison’s early and near-total dominance of the high-end PCIe 5.0 SSD market, Samsung came, saw, and…well, tried to put up a good fight with its 9100 Pro. Samsung did a lot of the same things right that it had with the 990 Pro, which was itself a fitting successor to the popular 980 Pro, by producing a fast, efficient, and consistent drive. Only one thing was missing: a high-capacity 8TB SKU designed not only to answer the Black SN850X but to take back the initiative while using the newest flagship hardware.

Samsung is no pushover. Its high-quality flash has great random read latency, something everyone desires, and the company knows how to produce a drive that, at the very least, holds its own in every other metric. The 9100 Pro isn’t the fastest drive, but it is more efficient than any of the high-end SSDs that came before it, and it performed well enough to stay in the fight. It was perhaps a little late to the party, but it has been competitive, especially with Samsung’s aggressive pricing, and we’ve only recently reviewed drives that truly improve upon it.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

  • closs.sebastien
    finally samsung goes > 2 tb ... the magician did some miracle..
    Reply
  • tamalero
    That price jump is more than 50% o_O
    Reply
  • JayGau
    closs.sebastien said:
    finally samsung goes > 2 tb ... the magician did some miracle..
    What? I've got a 990 Pro 4Tb almost two years ago.
    Reply
  • Stomx
    With its 600 TB written per each 1 TB size, which means its P/E endurance is even less than 600 cycles, this and mostly all other TLC SSDs on the market were not made to last if some best QLC already reach endurance 3000

    Am I too wrong to expect ( based on the well known scaling of endurance with number of bits per cell which drops by an order of magnitude from SLC to MLC to TLC to QLC ) that if QLC reach 3,000 P/E cycles, some best TLC ones have to be in the 30,000 range not 600?
    Reply
  • Jame5
    Did samsung magician ever get support for setting 4kn block sizes rather than continuing on with 512e?
    Reply
  • Stomx
    By the way is it safe to use Sansung SSDs on Linux if it's Magician software is not supported on Linux?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Concerning idle power:

    I just have to confirm that you waited for it to be truly idle. In my experience, this is best accomplished by watching the controller temperature and checking that it drops almost back to whatever it was, before you started writing to it. If you check immediately after writing a bunch of data, the drive will still be consolidating the data, and thus won't be truly idle.

    Second, would you please try measuring PCIe 5.0 drives in 4.0 mode? I had asked this before, and Jarred even agreed before he left. Even if you don't repeat the full suite of benchmarks in PCIe 4.0 mode, at least giving us the power data would be very helpful for those of us who only have a PCIe 4.0-compatible M.2 slot!
    Reply
  • JayGau
    Stomx said:
    By the way is it safe to use Sansung SSDs on Linux if it's Magician software is not supported on Linux?
    You don't need the software. It's a nice tool, but it's absolutely not mandatory. I have a 990 Pro in my PC and I haven't even reinstalled Magician after I did a Windows fresh install a few months ago (I didn't think about it and the drive works just fine).
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Stomx said:
    With its 600 TB written per each 1 TB size, which means its P/E endurance is even less than 600 cycles, this and mostly all other TLC SSDs on the market were not made to last if some best QLC already reach endurance 3000
    Well, if it's using 512-byte sectors, then they probably account for more write amplification than those QLC drives.

    Stomx said:
    Am I too wrong to expect ( based on the well known scaling of endurance with number of bits per cell which drops by an order of magnitude from SLC to MLC to TLC to QLC ) that if QLC reach 3,000 P/E cycles, some best TLC ones have to be in the 30,000 range not 600?
    I don't recall a TLC drive with such endurance. You could look at a mixed-workload datacenter drive, like the Solidigm D7-P5520 (which I have), and its endurance of 7000 TBW for 3.84 TB capacity. That's a ratio of 1823. If you go up to a SLC drive, like the D7-P5810, the 800 GB capacity has 73,000 TBW, which is a ratio of 91250. So, there's a more recent data point for you about what's possible with SLC.

    Which QLC drive are you claiming has a TBW:TB ratio of 3k?

    Stomx said:
    By the way is it safe to use Sansung SSDs on Linux if it's Magician software is not supported on Linux?
    Yes, of course. The Magician software is just a tool for querying and configuring the drive. Don't confuse it with the device driver.

    Lots of people use Samsung Pro NVMe SSDs in Linux (including myself, although it's the 990 Pro). At the end of the day, it's just a NVMe drive and it implements the NVMe standard.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Jame5 said:
    Did samsung magician ever get support for setting 4kn block sizes rather than continuing on with 512e?
    The 990 Pro only advertises support for 512-byte sectors, even with the latest firmware. I have no idea about the 9100 Pro, but if it's not advertising support for 4k sectors, it's going to need a firmware update and not simply a change at the "Magician" level.

    Unless Samsung has promised 4k sector support, I'd guess it's not coming for this drive. I don't see why they'd add it, so late after launch.

    BTW, my Samsung PM9A3 came formatted with 512-byte sectors, but I was able to reformat it to use 4k sectors (which I did in Linux: nvme format /dev/nvme0n1 --block-size=4096). Sadly, I didn't benchmark it before the change, and now it's got data on it so I'm not switching it back. However, that's a somewhat recent example of a Samsung NVMe drive supporting both formats.
    Reply