A New Kind Of Fast: AMD Athlon XP 2200+

Heat Dissipation: All AMD-CPUs Compared

• Page 1: Chasing The P4: Athlon Core With A New Design
• Page 2: Chasing The P4: Athlon Core With A New Design, Continued
• Page 3: Now Required: Protection Against Thermal Death
• Page 4: Now Required: Protection Against Thermal Death, Continued
• Page 5: Comparison: T-Bred Vs. Palomino Vs. T-Bird Vs. (Barton)
• Page 6: Heat Dissipation: All AMD-CPUs Compared
• Page 7: Exclusive Details On The Barton (Q3 2002)
• Page 8: Greater Yield: 322 Athlon-CPUs Per Wafer
• Page 9: Clock Increase And Heat Dissipation
• Page 10: Overclocking: Not A Whole Lot Possible
• Page 11: New Guidelines For CPU Coolers: No Cheap Models, Continued
• Page 12: Confusion: Differentiating Between Thoroughbred & Palomino
• Page 13: Test Setup And Details
• Page 14: 32 Benchmarks Under Windows XP
• Page 15: Benchmark Results
• Page 16: DirectX 7 Games: 3D Mark 2000
• Page 17: MP3 Audio-Encoding: Lame MP3
• Page 18: MPEG-2 Video Encoding: Pinnacle Studio 7
• Page 19: SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU Und Multimedia
• Page 20: Multimedia-Performance: PC Mark 2002
• Page 21: Office-/Internet-Performance: Sysmark 2002
• Page 22: 3D Rendering Performance: SPECviewperf
• Page 23: Archiving: WinACE 2.11
• Page 24: 3D-Rendering: Cinema 4D XL 7.303
• Page 25: Conclusion: The Competition Bids Adieu