Eight 5.1- And 7.1-Channel Gaming Headsets, Reviewed

Psyko Carbon

Psyko Audio made a name for itself when it released the Psyko 5.1 in 2010, a unique gaming headset designed with surround sound in mind. The company updated its product with the Psyko Krypton the following year. Even newer, we have the Psyko Carbon.

The Carbon is the most expensive headset in our comparison, and it sells for $200 from Psyko's website. Weighing in at 1 lb, 1.4 oz, it’s also the heaviest headset in this round-up.

We're impressed with Psyko's sturdy build quality and snug fitment. However, its weight coupled with a tight squeeze cumulatively lead to pronounced discomfort over time. Psyko's headsets certainly boast a unique design, and while I haven’t tried this model's predecessors, I can't discern any significant visual difference between pictures of the Carbon, the original Psyko 5.1, or Psyko's Krypton. The company’s signature style looks good, though. It's a mean-looking, unapologetic headset to be sure.

Psyko offers the only detachable microphone in our round-up, mounted on the right ear cup. This is far and away the best-sounding microphone in our tests, delivering excellent voice reproduction and low noise.

A true 5.1-channel surround headset, Psyko won't divulge the Carbon's driver specifications. Based on the best measurements we could take without completely dismantling our review sample, it appears as though the center, front, and side speakers are 30 mm, complemented by a 40 mm sub. Assuming this is correct, the Carbon's configuration is similar to the CM Storm Sirus. All of the speakers except the subwoofer are mounted in the headband, directing sound through plastic tubes to the intended direction of the audio channel.

The ear cups have a unique pivot-open cover that allows ambient sound to pass in at the expense of some bass and overall sound quality. This is an awesome feature, and I wish other manufacturers would catch on. If you're gaming but still need to hear what's happening in the world around you, it's nice to have the option to let some noise in. 

Psyko includes an amplifier that requires power from an external AC adapter. The amp boasts two dials: one for bass and one for volume. Also, indicator lights visually reflect when each channel is being used, except for the sub. Although you can bypass the amplifier, it's probably not recommended. Because the company doesn't provide any specifications for this headset, we don't know what its impedance is. Assuming they're on the higher side, though, given their size, additional voltage from an amp should help drive a higher listening level.

The Psyko Carbon requires a sound card with either six- or eight-channel analog output, and it does not support USB connectivity. Although USB is much more convenient, many enthusiasts prefer to use higher-end discrete sound cards with their own on-board audio processors, so Psyko's decision to market its premium headset to that crowd makes sense. Of course, as a result, there are no drivers to install and no software written specifically to control this headset. Instead, you'll have to go into your sound card's control panel to fine tune the output you get from the Carbon.

Psyko includes the aforementioned amplifier and an owner's manual in the Carbon's bundle. For a $200 package, that's pretty lightweight.

  • xtreme5
    amazing stff.
    Reply
  • cleeve
    xtreme5amazing stff.
    Wassat stand for... "Space, The Final Frontier"? :)
    Reply
  • spookie
    great read! Never thought virtual surround sound was that good
    Reply
  • cleeve
    spookiegreat read! Never thought virtual surround sound was that good
    Yeah, me neither. Surprised the hell out of me.
    Reply
  • Thanks Toms for doing a review on 5.1 headsets. I been researching one for the past two weeks on other review websites, and online stores, but didn't feel satisfied. Could you guys do a review comparing these headsets you reviewed already to a dedicated audio card like the Asus Xonar Essence STX (with a pre amp) with a Sennheiser HD 598 Headphones (or HD 800)? I want to know if it is like night and day compared to these 5.1 headsets (also make readers see what they are missing from using onboard audio). I know its a few hundred dollars more, but i found out that i was more happy gaming with a $70 audio card than seeing 8x AA (using Nvidia Inspector) with a $500 GPU.
    Reply
  • cleeve
    bunnywannyCould you guys do a review comparing these headsets you reviewed already to a dedicated audio card like the Asus Xonar Essence STX (with a pre amp) with a Sennheiser HD 598 Headphones (or HD 800)? I want to know if it is like night and day compared to these 5.1 headsets (also make readers see what they are missing from using onboard audio).
    I like the idea, but it'll probably take a while to make it happen.

    Next up on the audio to-do list is a full-sized 5.1/7.1 surround system comparo. :)
    Reply
  • killeeeeer
    It would of been great if you tested the Roccat Kave but other than that great review. Been searching for headset for long time , now ill go with the Corsair Vengeance 1500 for sure .
    Reply
  • crysex
    Thanks Toms so much for doing this review. I have been searching one for a long time. Ready to buy a good quality sound card + headset after my next paycheck!
    Reply
  • iamtheking123
    I'll stick to my $100 stereo headphones instead of $20 headphones + $80 spent on fake surround sound and marketing. We've all tried virtual surround sound in PowerDVD or WinDVD and it sucks. Makes everything sound underwater and no where close to having 5 actual speakers set up throughout a room.
    Reply
  • tomfreak
    I am still sticking with more expensive traditional speakers, simply due to my ear need some air to breath. These headphone arent comfortable especially during summer.
    Reply