Trump strikes back at China with a 100% tariff and critical software ban — major escalation retaliates for China's rare earth restrictions

The White House
(Image credit: The White House)

Just hours after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs on China-made goods in retaliation for unprecedented export controls on rare earth materials, he actually did so, increasing import tariffs on Chinese goods to 100% starting November 1. In addition, the U.S. will impose export controls on 'critical software,' something that may be more crippling than the tariffs.

A 100% tariff

China's new policy requires companies to obtain government approval before exporting any product containing more than 0.1% of rare earths that originate from or are processed in the country. The list of materials includes seven rare-earth families, including samarium, terbium, dysprosium, and lutetium, as well as their magnet and sputtering-target forms. Assuming that the list is accurate, China expands its 'Tier 3' restrictions introduced this April, which means no critical hit to foundation materials, but precisely crippling hits along the way of devices and industries worldwide.

Given that the lion's share of the global rare earth supply is under China's control, the export control decision has raised alarms in multiple sectors, including automotive, consumer electronics, and chip manufacturing. How exactly this could hurt the industries is something that remains to be seen, but China's plan to impose additional control globally is already evident.

Critical software

In response, the U.S. will not only double tariffs (which is set to hit American businesses first), but also introduce export restrictions on 'critical software,' which is perhaps the most crippling sanction. The U.S. government does not define what 'critical software' is, which leaves the door open to misunderstanding. So, let us speculate.

Earlier this year, the Trump administration restricted shipments of chip design and simulation tools to China while the president was negotiating with the Chinese leader. That helped resolve some of the fundamental issues with rare-earth exports from China and made life easier for Cadence and Synopsys.

What happens if the Trump administration broadens the definition of 'critical software' beyond EDA tools? The following targets are likely to include AI development frameworks such as PyTorch, TensorFlow, and JAX, as well as distributed-training software that enables large-scale model training on advanced accelerators. Limiting access to this software would directly constrain China's ability to develop advanced AI systems, even if it manages to procure the necessary hardware.

Another area likely to come under scrutiny is compilers, firmware, and embedded software that control the operation of hardware. This includes CPU and GPU microcode, as well as FPGA configuration tools, which could potentially harm American and European companies with production operations in China, but will also impact Chinese companies.

Controls could also reach manufacturing and infrastructure software, which will include everything from network management (unless already replaced by modern, closed-source Linux from a China-based company) to wafer fab equipment (WFE) tools that tend to run customized versions of Linux and Windows. It will not collapse them overnight, but will introduce a new set of operational difficulties.

Then again, without a precise definition, this is all speculation.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • BloodLust2222
    Seems intelligent. Let's cause more pain and tax burden for the American consumer with an economy that's already falling down.
    Reply
  • chaos215bar2
    Trump strikes back at China
    (Cites facts not in evidence.)

    US residents will certainly be feeling the pain, though.
    Reply
  • wussupi83
    BloodLust2222 said:
    Seems intelligent. Let's cause more pain and tax burden for the American consumer with an economy that's already falling down.
    Im genuinely curious, what do you think China's intentions are in regard to their global positioning in the next few decades? And what do you think the US and the west should be doing?
    Reply
  • jg.millirem
    wussupi83 said:
    Im genuinely curious, what do you think China's intentions are in regard to their global positioning in the next few decades? And what do you think the US and the west should be doing?
    Cooperating. And the US empire should get over its “global superiority” nonsense and stop hurting its own people in the vain pursuit of global dominance.
    Reply
  • nookoool
    It seems any Chinese company that is not partially owned by western investors eventually gets ban/saction from procuring high tech software and hardware anyways.
    Reply
  • wussupi83
    jg.millirem said:
    Cooperating. And the US empire should get over its “global superiority” nonsense and stop hurting its own people in the vain pursuit of global dominance.
    I'm legitimately trying to understand here. Are you saying you believe China operates fairly and balanced with a focus on cooperation in regards to all trade relations? And that the US, in an attempt to cling to a dated mindset of "global superiority", is operating unfairly and unbalanced?
    Reply
  • ggeeoorrggee
    wussupi83 said:
    I'm legitimately trying to understand here. Are you saying you believe China operates fairly and balanced with a focus on cooperation in regards to all trade relations? And that the US, in an attempt to cling to a dated mindset of "global superiority", is operating unfairly and unbalanced?
    I can’t speak for the other poster, but i agree with the idea of the problem — China’s historic pattern of ignoring global IP laws and other practices are definitely in need of a response.

    My issue lies with the fact that IMO the current actions at best are a “well at least they’re doing something” situation. In reality, the whole tariff policy is too blunt, too generalized, and poorly thought out. I remain unconvinced that anyone who actually understands the nuances of tariffs, other economic coercion measures, or how a global economy works has the ear of the president. He certainly lacks such understanding or at least doesn’t publicly display such understanding.

    Additionally, we should address the fact that the overall tariff policy directly antagonizes other counties we need as allies against the juggernaut of China’s economy.
    Reply
  • wussupi83
    ggeeoorrggee said:
    I can’t speak for the other poster, but i agree with the idea of the problem — China’s historic pattern of ignoring global IP laws and other practices are definitely in need of a response.

    My issue lies with the fact that IMO the current actions at best are a “well at least they’re doing something” situation. In reality, the whole tariff policy is too blunt, too generalized, and poorly thought out. I remain unconvinced that anyone who actually understands the nuances of tariffs, other economic coercion measures, or how a global economy works has the ear of the president. He certainly lacks such understanding or at least doesn’t publicly display such understanding.

    Additionally, we should address the fact that the overall tariff policy directly antagonizes other counties we need as allies against the juggernaut of China’s economy.
    I appreciate your thoughtful reply. My personal biggest mental hurdle is I read "tarrifs are bad, this administration is bad" and so on and so forth all day long. But 99% of them are non-constructive. They don't propose alternative hard solutions. And like you say, at least tariffs are something. I'm all for the let's cooperate and dance around the camp fire together approach. But what does that actually look like in regards to global trade policies and will all parties involved put aside their personal ambitions and agree to it?
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    this is like a kitten trying to retaliate agaisnt a bobcat that is required for it to even get food to stay healthy...

    Also gl trying to block software...that can be sent privately from any internet source
    Reply
  • Pemalite
    Pretty advantageous for my own nation (Australia) as we spin up production for rare-earths, we currently have the 4th largest in the world for "known" reserves. (And this nation is vast with up to 80% of the continent remaining under-explored for minerals.)

    This spat between the US and China is just making it more viable for us to come in swinging to save the day.
    Brazil also has a huge amount of reserves, so I would bet they are making similar moves.

    Tariffs though? won't do much. It's the American consumer that pays for it, it doesn't impact anything on the world stage outside of imports directly into the USA that the American consumer ends up paying for.
    It's a joke really.
    Reply