Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Battlefield 4 Played in 4K With Four OC GTX Titans

By - Source: YouTube | B 44 comments

Interested to see what Battefield 4 looks like in 4K?

Battlefield 4 (Beta) #3 - 4K (4096x2160) | 4x GTX-Titan SC | 3970X (4.8Ghz) | ThirtyIR.com

A new video has been posted on YouTube, showing some gameplay of the Battlefield 4 Open Beta in a (higher than) 4K resolution. The resolution by which it is played is 4800 x 2560, which is achieved by using three 30" 2560 x 1600 monitors in a portrait Nvidia Surround setup. Do the math -- that's 12.3 megapixels!

To bring enough juice to the displays, a total of four EVGA's GTX Titan SC's have been used in conjunction with an i7-3970X clocked to 4.8 GHz, as well as 32 GB of Corsair Dominator Platinum 2133 MHz memory. All of the in-game graphics settings have been maxed out, including the Anti-Aliasing settings. According to the description of the video, a total of 5.1 GB of graphics memory was used.

The recording itself wasn't done at the 4800 x 2560 resolution, but rather at the 4K resolution (4096 x 2160). On YouTube, it can be viewed in its 'Original' quality, though beware, you'll need a hefty Internet connection and system to be able to play it, not to mention that you won't be able to see the full beauty of it without a 4K monitor.

Want to know how your graphics card stacks up in Battlefield 4? Check out our Battlefield 4 Beta Performance benchmark article.

Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 13 Hide
    Amdlova , October 20, 2013 12:21 PM
    I CANNOT SEE MORE THAN 24 fps on youtube ;) 
Other Comments
  • 1 Hide
    expl0itfinder , October 20, 2013 12:16 PM
    Brought the titans to their knees...
  • 1 Hide
    adimeister , October 20, 2013 12:20 PM
    Holy smokes. That holy FPS and graphics! :o  Very nice.
  • Display all 44 comments.
  • 13 Hide
    Amdlova , October 20, 2013 12:21 PM
    I CANNOT SEE MORE THAN 24 fps on youtube ;) 
  • 3 Hide
    clonazepam , October 20, 2013 12:23 PM
    According to comments, he gets solid 60 fps. Any choppiness comes from editing and it being shown at 24 fps. I just wanted to see if my internet connection could display the video in its original format continuously. Yay for me. I hope he practices on his fps skills, and he makes his money back for the rig from youtube. ;) 
  • 0 Hide
    mlopinto2k1 , October 20, 2013 1:06 PM
    To me, this is like purchasing a Ferrari. Hopefully he has enough money to pay for the electric bill (maintenance and repairs for the Ferrari) otherwise what a shame. Nice rig though! I would definitely want to show it off.
  • 3 Hide
    ingtar33 , October 20, 2013 1:29 PM
    this game is more cpu bound then gpu bound. i doubt he got any more performance out of 4 titans then he would have got out of 2.
  • 4 Hide
    none12345 , October 20, 2013 1:52 PM
    Pretty crappy graphics for a supposid next gen game.
  • -7 Hide
    chumly , October 20, 2013 1:58 PM
    You guys can downvote my previous comment all you want, but look at it. It's a damn console port. The trees textures look like crap, the handrails and reflections and wall textures look like crap as well as most of the art and design on the inside of the buildings. wooo fn hooo you can run it a 4k: crap textures still look like crap at higher res.

    I couldn't be more unimpressed for a game that is so GPU demanding.

    Imho this isn't doing anything new or exciting and it looks the SAME (regardless of the res).

    $10k computer to play console games at 4k. lol. Sounds like a great idea. We should all do it. (not really)
  • -5 Hide
    chumly , October 20, 2013 1:58 PM
    double post (sorry stupid website, I even went to the forum to try to delete it and it's not letting me)
  • 2 Hide
    JD88 , October 20, 2013 2:07 PM
    Could have told me this was Battlefield 3 and I would have believed it. Way overhyped.
  • 6 Hide
    delrey , October 20, 2013 2:23 PM
    Chumly,

    The beta was an older build of the game was to test server load. The final version of the game will be much better looking than beta. The same was true of BF3 as well. I would keep your uninformed comments down until the full release of the game.
  • 0 Hide
    JOSHSKORN , October 20, 2013 3:05 PM
    What are the actual system requirements for 4K gaming?
  • 2 Hide
    ingtar33 , October 20, 2013 3:40 PM
    Quote:
    What are the actual system requirements for 4K gaming?


    you should be able to manage with an i7-4770k/3770k/2600k and 2 780s/Titans in SLi and presumably 2 r9-290x/290 in xfire; that's why i said that guy probably would have achieved the exact same results from 2 titans in SLi.
  • -2 Hide
    fcabanski , October 20, 2013 3:56 PM
    It may look better, but it's still the same old shooter game.
  • 0 Hide
    MasterMace , October 20, 2013 5:42 PM
    Not paying EA for a browser game's map pack.
  • -1 Hide
    beta212 , October 20, 2013 5:48 PM
    If it takes 4 titans to get to this degree.... I'll probably go amd instead.
  • 4 Hide
    xaephod , October 20, 2013 6:37 PM
    Is it me or does the graphics look blocky and old? I played the beta with my 7970ghz and I was underwhelmed. Planetside 2 has better looking graphics, and that game is free!!
  • -2 Hide
    damian86 , October 20, 2013 6:48 PM
    So overclocked titans, I wonder what was the fps, and you can tell the video has been speed up a bit to make it look faster?
  • -3 Hide
    bigshootr8 , October 20, 2013 7:19 PM
    People need to keep in mind this is more then one display its 3x 4k monitors the fps would be through the roof at 1080p with 4 titans. and a 290x on its own wont match up to 4 titans.
Display more comments