- ViewSonic VX924: The Near Future Of LCD Displays
- ViewSonic Overdrive LCDs: A New Era of Very Fast Panels?
- I Want My 32" LCD TV
- 3D Stereo Technology: Is it Ready for Prime Time?
- Great Design: 2 New 17" LCDs from LG
- The DoubleSight DS1700 Gives Your PC Double Vision
- 26" LCD TVs: Are They Ready for Prime Time?
- LCD Or Plasma - What's Your Pleasure? Understanding Modern...
- 8ms 19" LCDs: Speed for Gaming, but at What Cost?
- Can 19" LCDs Pass the Frag Test?
- Phenom as good or better than Intel in gaming?
- need help finding a High end Gaming CPU
- antec three hundred question
- Looking for new printer/scanner/copier
- THGC Needs You -Team 40051
- need help on first time ocing... q6600
- AMD X4 9850BE(2.5GHZ) VS INTEL QUAD Q9650(3.0GHZ) FASTER??
- Strategy for overclocking a CPU to its limit! Will this work?
- GENUINE FLOPS IS WORLD NEW STANDARD~~
- Q6600 OC
Too Slow
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: finding, 19
Syndication:
Too Slow
The LG1940P emerged from our tests with disappointing scores for latency.

The curve speaks for itself - the 25 ms claimed are very optimistic. The average is closer to 50 ms.
In Practice
For office and graphics applications, the LG 1940P is an excellent monitor. The viewing angles are wide, and the colors are faithful. This is another to candidate to serve as a monitor for photography enthusiasts, but not for anything else. Trying to play games on it was a disaster. It's way too slow for FPS games, and also for Warhammer 40K, for example. That's a shame, because the colors are splendid.
The same goes for video. Video noise wasn't perceptible, but latency was visible far too often in tracking shots.
Conclusion
While the L1740P had won us over with its attractive looks and acceptable panel, the LG 1940P didn't convince us. For $550, we would have preferred a more up-to-date panel, for example an LG/Philips 12 ms.
- Previous page Spatial Uniformity
- Next page LG L1980U