GeForce GTX 295 Vs. GTX 275 SLI: When Two Are Better Than One

Conclusion

More than anything, this was meant as a purely academic look at Nvidia’s SLI technology—to compare SLI across two cards to SLI running on one card. We suspected that the PCI Express throughput afforded by two x16 slots would emerge as a slight advantage over a single board with two GPUs running in one x16 slot.

In many cases, it looks like we were right, even if the explanation can’t be solely attributed to PCI Express bandwidth (there’s also the nForce 200 bridge chip and its features to consider, along with the different timings of Nvidia’s SLI link between the different card combinations).

Given the shortage of GeForce GTX 295s in the channel right now, we thought it’d be interesting to see how closely the performance of a GeForce GTX 295 could be matched by two GTX 275s. And the answer, given the GTX 275’s rather substantial clock speed advantage, is that you’ll quite easily outmode a GTX 295 using a couple of 275s—often with frame rates that are 10% higher or more. Moreover, the single-GPU cards are actually cheaper than the premium dual-GPU board. The trade-off, of course, is higher power consumption, the monopolization of four expansion slots on your SLI-capable motherboard, and a less-scalable platform (at least a single GTX 295 paves the way for four-way SLI down the road). The direction you take your own gaming system will naturally depend on a number of different variables, and the practicality of a GeForce GTX 295 might outweigh the performance advantages of two GTX 275s.

Sometimes we just get these little urges to explore the intricacies of the latest and greatest. Having run the comparison of two seemingly equivalent configurations, we’d actually be happiest with the two GTX 275s on an X58-based platform. Or, if you have your eye on the value prize, check out a couple of Radeon HD 4770s on X58 at a price point that cuts these tested setups in half.

Chris Angelini
Chris Angelini is an Editor Emeritus at Tom's Hardware US. He edits hardware reviews and covers high-profile CPU and GPU launches.
  • been waiting for more on the 295...
    Reply
  • dragonfang18
    I already ordered 2 295's... $504 each.
    Reply
  • imrul
    "Intel Core i7 920 Extreme (Bloomfield)" (page 3)

    there's no extreme version of i7 920, nor is it bloomfield...
    Reply
  • dragonfang18
    i7 IS Bloomfield imrul...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_i7
    Reply
  • reasonablevoice
    What the hell is up with the underclocked cards out performing the others in that H.A.W.X.

    Can the author of the article comment with what they think is going on there?
    Reply
  • cangelini
    reasonablevoiceWhat the hell is up with the underclocked cards out performing the others in that H.A.W.X.Can the author of the article comment with what they think is going on there?
    Happened in WiC w/o AA as well. Difficult to say went on there, but the results are repeatable. Probably more important, though, is that when more of an emphasis is put on the graphics subsystem, you see those stock-clocked boards take the lead, as we'd expect.
    Reply
  • avatar_raq
    1.Very good article, unlike some other author's articles in this site, this article is solid (starting from the test system down to the conclusion) and interesting, this is what I always expect from Chris.
    2.As for the strange issue in L4D, HAWX and WIC where the slower 275s beat the faster ones....Odd indeed. Is there any chance the normally clocked cards automatically clocked down to 2D mode or somthing in-game? In other words the GPUs usage dropped due to the CPU bottleneck or whatever, and the cards' driver decided to clockdown to save energy! I've seen nvidia and ati cards do that. The monitoring utility of rivatuner could have revealed such things since it shows real-time clocks..BTW what software did you use to downclock?
    It would be funny to consider downclocking our cards to 'gain' performance!!
    3.I hope the new (single PCB) 295 will drop in larger quantities, perhaps it will be more practical than the current one, and will tip the balnce here in its favor.
    http://www.techpowerup.com/img/09-05-12/13c.jpg
    Reply
  • Can you put the "online shop" section underneath the "Next" button for the next page...its really annoying and inconvenient to have it positioned within the article as it seems to be.
    Thanks
    Reply
  • rags_20
    Please benchmark in Very High.
    Reply
  • JeanLuc
    rags_20Please benchmark in Very High.
    I noticed that to, if I owned that kind of hardware I would be playing every game at the highest settings even if it is Crysis.
    Reply