Intel Shows Off Multi-Chiplet Sapphire Rapids CPU with HBM

Intel formally confirmed that select 4th Generation Xeon Scalable 'Sapphire Rapids' processors will feature on-package HBM memory late last year, but the company has never demonstrated an actual CPU equipped with HBM or revealed its DRAM configuration. At the International Symposium on Microelectronics hosted by IMAPS earlier this week, the company finally showcased the processor with HBM and confirmed its multi-chiplet design.

While Intel confirmed on numerous occasions that Sapphire Rapids processors will support HBM (presumably HBM2E) and DDR5 memory and will be able to use HBM either with or without main DDR5 memory, it never showcased an actual HBM-equipped CPU, until this week (thanks to the picture published by Tom Wassick/@wassickt).

If Intel opts to use such KGSDs, HBM2E memory will provide Sapphire Rapids CPU a whopping 3.68 TB/s peak memory bandwidth (or 921.6 GB/s per die), but only for 128GB of memory.  By contrast, SPR's eight DDR5-4800 memory channels supporting one module per channel and offering 307.2 GB/s will support at least 4TB of memory using Samsung's recently announced 512GB DDR5 RDIMM modules.

 

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • MB007
    "Therefore, it looks like HBM-equipped SPRs will only be offered to select
    clients (just like Intel's Xeon Scalable 9200 CPUs with up to 56 cores) and will mostly be aimed at supercomputers. "

    The question is who would be willing enough to integrate those in its supercomputers anymore, after the fiasco with Aurora. Which is still a running fiasco...
    Reply
  • mitch074
    Pfeh! It's all a bunch of cores glued together, no way it's real technological innovation...
    Reply
  • JayNor
    MB007 said:

    The question is who would be willing enough to integrate those in its supercomputers anymore, after the fiasco with Aurora. Which is still a running fiasco...

    Intel already said that Aurora is using these.
    Reply
  • MB007
    You did not really get my point. Of course Aurora is supposed to use these. But Intel practically broke multiple contract agreements, they were not able to hold any time line of whatsoever. Its still not finished, after dozens of frign years. In the end Aurora was a very expensive prestige project for intel, that pretty much back fired. They did not really make a single dime with it, on the contrary charges were in the hundreds of millions. And even worse, they simply lost quite some credibility with it. So I ask you again, who is willing to take the risk.
    Reply
  • JayNor
    I think the SPR chips have been sampling since last Nov.. ... pcie5, cxl, ddr5, gen3 optane, DSA, AMX matrix math on bfloat16... and 8 stacks of HBM. Pretty amazing if it all works.

    6x 9k units of Ponte Vecchio GPUs may be the hold-up now. Who else is doing 47 tile GPUs?

    Maybe we'll see a demo in a couple of weeks.
    Reply
  • Integr8d
    mitch074 said:
    Pfeh! It's all a bunch of cores glued together, no way it's real technological innovation...

    The stock market said otherwise;)
    Reply
  • JayNor
    BSC seems happy with Optane, so Intel is solving some problems that others haven't.
    Reply
  • JayNor
    The hbm is not so much of an innovation, but we haven't heard the whole story yet. One of the diagrams I saw shows 4 lanes of slingshot going directly into each SPR. They also haven't announced how they are using the DSA.

    https://ecpannualmeeting.com/assets/overview/sessions/SYCL_Programming_Model_for_Aurora.pdf
    Intel also hasn't shown their Rambo Cache details yet. I saw an Intel patent app with the whole foveros base layer of a GPU populated with a grid of SRAM chiplets, so Intel has some show-and-tell coming.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    MB007 said:
    You did not really get my point. Of course Aurora is supposed to use these. But Intel practically broke multiple contract agreements, they were not able to hold any time line of whatsoever. Its still not finished, after dozens of frign years. In the end Aurora was a very expensive prestige project for intel, that pretty much back fired. They did not really make a single dime with it, on the contrary charges were in the hundreds of millions. And even worse, they simply lost quite some credibility with it. So I ask you again, who is willing to take the risk.
    Maybe they did not make a single dime with it specifically, but if they used the wafers that where to be used for aurora to supply the mobile and desktop market in the last two years then they made a crap ton of money from it even with the fines.

    And they also gained a lot of credibility with OEMs and "the common man" by being able to supply the whole market as if nothing had happened and without increasing the prices at all or reducing the value.

    Having a business is all about weighing the pros and cons of everything and going with what you believe will benefit your company the most.
    Reply
  • MB007
    jeez its like talking against a wall. How did you come up with this fairy tell.
    One of their big problems was with their process node, yields were crappy as it only can get. So those wafers werent reallocated for other purposes.
    And dont talk like they were able to supply, because clearly the last ERs showed more or less, growth was catastrophic considering we were and still are in a mega semi conductor cycle.
    So supply is one thing, but apparently the demand for their products was not the same, because everybody else benefited much more from the cycle than intel was able to, although they were less capacity strained. think about that rather.
    Reply