Trump's Tariffs and Tech: Everything You Need to Know (Update: Some Postponed Indefinitely)

55

The U.S. is preparing for heavier tariffs on Chinese goods. (Image credit: Shutterstock)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Gurg
    So US government gets $75 B in tariff revenue but consumers only pay between $45 B to $57 B in increased prices for these luxury goods. The increased prices should go away once those Commie loving manufacturers can move their production back to US or to other friendly countries that treat the US fairly and have non-slave labor. Sounds like a tremendous deal for the US and our economy as $75 >($45 to 57).
    Reply
  • Lutedogg1
    Good, I'm tired of buying slave labor products from Communist China where they put up nets at Foxconn factories to prevent workers from jumping to death and commit suicide. Their products should have been tariffed a long time ago. They can build automated facilities in the US. It will help our economy and stop slave labor. I don't care if I have to pay more for a couple years and wait for the transition. Hello $35 hourly jobs in America. The monopoly tech giants will make more money when there is actually a middle class in America again. Foxconn said they were going to automate slave labor jobs because they cost too much in China.....pathetic....https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36376966 ....ohhh....they did it already.
    Reply
  • mihen
    This was a very well written and neutral article. It didn't take any biased stance for or against the tariffs, just breaking down the facts.
    Personally, I don't think these tariffs will last long. Given the situation in Hong Kong, China can't afford this trade war.
    Reply
  • tomspown
    I hope the taxing stays in the USA and does not affect EU in any way, this way USA prices will match our prices here in EU. We wont have to feel bad about over paying for pc
    hardware.
    Reply
  • ElectrO_90
    Gurg said:
    other friendly countries that treat the US fairly and have non-slave labor.
    yes, like the US Prison Service does NOT employ slave labor...and force people to work for 5 cents an hour
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I have all kinds of questions about how the tax is actually applied.
    For instance, if a SSD is assembled in China using chips form Korea, does the tariff apply to the entire unit?
    Likewise, if memory chips from China are exported to Vietnam for assembly of the DIMM, does the entire DIMM skirt the tariffs?
    What if the merchandise just transits through another country, maybe getting repackaged along the way?It seems to me that what they want is a value-added tax, though I doubt that's actually how it's implemented.
    Reply
  • BiggWigg92
    Gurg said:
    So US government gets $75 B in tariff revenue but consumers only pay between $45 B to $57 B in increased prices for these luxury goods. The increased prices should go away once those Commie loving manufacturers can move their production back to US or to other friendly countries that treat the US fairly and have non-slave labor. Sounds like a tremendous deal for the US and our economy as $75 >($45 to 57).
    Except those in America already strapped for cash will struggle more due to the price increase on many common items, even razors orally most anything mass produced.
    Reply
  • ElectrO_90
    BiggWigg92 said:
    Except those in America already strapped for cash will struggle more due to the price increase on many common items, even razors orally most anything mass produced.
    I love how its always these big corporations that are in trouble, even if they do make $30bn profit or more a year, it's the PEOPLE who have to suffer, not the corporation who could easily absorb the increase. But you know, they have to blame everyone else apart from Corporate Greed.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    ElectrO_90 said:
    I love how its always these big corporations that are in trouble, even if they do make $30bn profit or more a year, it's the PEOPLE who have to suffer, not the corporation who could easily absorb the increase. But you know, they have to blame everyone else apart from Corporate Greed.
    Yes, corporations are greedy. That's sort of the point of them. If their management fails to maximize profit, they get fired and new executives are brought in.

    So, then perhaps we should shift the blame to the investors. Wouldn't you want the biggest return on your investment? If you were going to take a smaller return, how would you know that it was worthwhile? Profitability is the easiest thing to measure, while "social good" or "being nice to consumers" is much harder to quantify. So, even for investors who aren't so greedy, the easiest thing to do is still just to look at the balance sheet.

    What I want to know is what's your solution?
    Reply
  • ElectrO_90
    People always have the power if they want and can avoid buying items and products. It has worked in the past.
    The solution is to tax everything fairly and remove loop holes from tax evasion.
    Setting prices rather than % as tax, more open accountancy in more detail.
    Who gets paid what and where the money goes.
    People who buy products should know who owns that product and which companies are involved and cost of production vs profit should be open, and seperate for information on how much was invested into that item to be produced (research)
    An open book is the way to go forward.

    I think Mass Profit over peoples lives should be allowed either. For instance, Toys'r'us was a profit making company, got stripped, then sold off and thousands of families lost their income and lives while a few made horrendous profits. This is where Capitalism fails because laws are made so shareholders get more money.
    Multitude of laws can prevent greed. For instance, workers in a company can hold 10-15% of the companies shares among the workers, so when the company makes a profit the people who made the profit for the company also benefit. As well as having that amount of shares means they get a decision on the board as well.

    The issue cannot be sorted in a post, but there are farer ways of doing things.

    Personally, I try to avoid anything owned by Nestle, because they are an atrocious company with their less than legal practices and problems they have caused around the world. But also knowing which other companies are owned by Nestle is a mine field.
    Reply