Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Our standard benchmarks and power tests are performed using the CPU’s stock frequencies (including any default boost/turbo) with all power-saving features enabled. We set optimized defaults in the BIOS and the memory by enabling the XMP profile. For this baseline testing, the Windows power scheme is set to Balanced (default) so the PC idles appropriately.
Synthetic Benchmarks
Synthetics offer a valuable method for evaluating a board's performance, as identical settings are expected to yield similar results. Turbo boost wattage and advanced memory timings are areas where motherboard manufacturers can still optimize for stability or performance, and these settings can impact specific testing scenarios.


















The Z890 Godlike performed well across the synthetic benchmarks, leading the pack in some and landing around average in others. There’s nothing to worry about here.
Timed Applications




The timed applications told the same story, with the board posting the lowest times in both Handbrake tests and LAME. Everything is in line with the timed applications.
3D Games and 3DMark




Starting with the launch of Zen 5, we’ve updated our game tests. We’re keeping the F1 racing game but have upgraded to F1 24. We also dropped Far Cry 6 in favor of an even more popular and good-looking game in Cyberpunk 2077. We run both games at 1920x1080 resolution using the Ultra preset (details listed above). Cyberpunk 2077 uses DLSS, while we left F1 24 to native resolution scaling. The goal of these settings is to determine if there are differences in performance at the most commonly used (and CPU/system-bound) resolution with settings most people use or strive for (Ultra). We expect the difference between boards in these tests to be minor, with most falling within the margin of error. We’ve also added a minimum FPS value, which can affect your gameplay and immersion experience.
In the most crucial tests for some people, the board performed on the faster side of average in the actual games, and was merely average in the UL 3DMark benchmarks. In other words, the Godlike is a solid performer across a wide variety of applications.
Overclocking
The Godlike ran our DDR5-8200 memory without issue, but that was to be expected considering the 9200 MT/s peak listed. With the right memory kit (read: one on the memory QVL) and a good IMC, we have no doubt it can reach those speeds, and likely even further with exotic cooling.
Power Consumption / VRM Temperatures
We used AIDA64’s System Stability Test with Stress CPU, FPU, Cache, and Memory enabled for power testing, using the peak power consumption value from the processor. The wattage reading obtained is from the wall via a Kill-A-Watt meter, capturing the entire PC, excluding the monitor. The only variable that changes is the motherboard; all other parts remain the same. Please note that we have moved to using only the stock power use/VRM temperature charts, as this section aims to ensure that the power delivery can handle flagship-class processors.
Power usage on this motherboard peaked at 346W, with the CPU reaching a maximum of around 255W, averaging 225W. Idle use was on the high side at 75W, but still slightly lower than the Taichi OCF and its sibling, the MEG Z890 Ace. Power usage should be marginally higher, as the board features numerous components that require power.


VRM temperatures from our probes peaked at just over 48 degrees Celsius, with the sensor reporting a slightly higher value of 52 degrees Celsius. The Frozr Design heatsink and wavy fin design effectively maintain the high-power components within specification. The only factor holding your CPU back is the cooling method, as the Godlike is capable of taking your scores to the promised land.
Bottom Line
The MSI Godlike boasts the fastest and most comprehensive features available on an E-ATX-sized motherboard. 10 GbE and Wi-Fi 7? Check. Eight M.2 sockets (4x 5.0 with the expansion card)? Check. Thunderbolt 5? Yes. EZ Features and AI Features? They’re in there, too. In terms of aesthetics, the clean design, tastefully implemented RGB lighting, and the Dynamic Dashboard III exude high-end vibes while still prioritizing functionality. It sounds perfect, and hardware-wise, it does have it all.
The competition, including the Gigabyte Z890 Aorus Xtreme AI TOP and the Asus ROG Maximus Z890 Extreme, are priced at $999.99. However, as of this writing, the Asus model is available for $799.99. I won't explore all the differences, but there aren’t many, as both offer 10 GbE, Thunderbolt 5, and overbuilt power delivery, and possess the characteristics of a flagship board.
In other words, the Godlike’s biggest (and maybe only) drawback is the price point. $1,329 is a substantial investment. And although it boasts a ‘Godlike’ feature list and specifications, it is overshadowed by competing companies who offer their competing wares for about $300 less. Still, many desire the best of the best, and the Godlike shares its throne with no one as one of the most capable motherboards on any consumer platform.
MORE: Best Motherboards
MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard
MORE: All Motherboard Content

Joe Shields is a Freelance writer for Tom’s Hardware US. He reviews motherboards.
Serious about your shooters? Pick up this 8K-polling ultra-lightweight Glorious Gaming Series 2 Pro wireless mouse for just $38
Seagate on track for 100TB HDDs by 2030 — claims current top drive will triple in capacity in 5 years
China's premier chipmaker SMIC faces chip yield woes as equipment maintenance and validation efforts stall
-
Energy96 Good review but probably should have reviewed the AMD version. Can’t imagine many people building a super high-end machine would choose Intel right now. The AMD version was also a little less expensive.Reply
I used the AMD version of this board with a 9950x3d and it’s awesome. No other board looks as good as this one, wish I could post up some pics but they just don’t do it justice. The board is a masterpiece and in a glass case with liquid cooling and all the animations and lcd screen it’s mind blowing. It’s pricy for sure but nothing else like it out there. Myself, I used the money I saved from a cancelled weekend trip to pay for it lol. Zero regrets, I could stare at it for hours. -
ITAngel Amazing, love the features listing for it.Reply
Personally, I would choose Intel, but I have my reasons, especially since I’ve previously owned both AMD Ryzen and Threadripper setups. My primary use is for creative work, so I really appreciated seeing a review of the Intel version. There are already so many reviews of the AMD versions online, so this was a refreshing change.Energy96 said:Good review but probably should have reviewed the AMD version. Can’t imagine many people building a super high-end machine would choose Intel right now. The AMD version was also a little less expensive.
I used the AMD version of this board with a 9950x3d and it’s awesome. No other board looks as good as this one, wish I could post up some pics but they just don’t do it justice. The board is a masterpiece and in a glass case with liquid cooling and all the animations and lcd screen it’s mind blowing. It’s pricy for sure but nothing else like it out there. Myself, I used the money I saved from a cancelled weekend trip to pay for it lol. Zero regrets, I could stare at it for hours. -
ITAngel
I am assuming 3.5 or 5.25 drives? Dang I just aged myself. :rofl:!Kindaian said:But... but... but... It has no floppy disk controller! -
Energy96
It’s an amazing board in either version for sure.ITAngel said:Amazing, love the features listing for it.
Personally, I would choose Intel, but I have my reasons, especially since I’ve previously owned both AMD Ryzen and Threadripper setups. My primary use is for creative work, so I really appreciated seeing a review of the Intel version. There are already so many reviews of the AMD versions online, so this was a refreshing change.
It’s probably great for professional work but I would say this is mostly targeted to gamers who want a showpiece. I couldn’t imagine this locked away inside a closed case. Anything short of a full glass case with water cooling seems like a waste. I put it in an Antec C8 glass curve. That’s also a great case btw, well designed, very sturdy, and a lot better quality than its price would suggest. I was pleasantly surprised. Antec getting back into the game is good to see. -
drtweak I can see it now!Reply
"I picked up my PC and my BIOS just reset on its own!"
Why put a Clear CMOS button on the back?
"Was plugging in my new printer via USB and i had reset my BIOS"
lol -
Energy96
It’s there to allow for easier overlocking functionality without needing to open the case.drtweak said:I can see it now!
"I picked up my PC and my BIOS just reset on its own!"
Why put a Clear CMOS button on the back?
"Was plugging in my new printer via USB and i had reset my BIOS"
lol
The buttons are recessed into the IO plate and you need to hold it down for a duration to reset it. Not likely going to happen by accident. Do you usually pick up your PC by the IO plate? lol.
This feature is also found on many other boards btw. I’ve had several with it, usually boards targeted at overclocking. -
HardwiredWireless
I think I would probably also choose Intel and I would use this generation if I were building a workstation and last generation if I were building a gaming rig. So far AMD has not come up with a processor that is better than one you can get from Intel.Energy96 said:Good review but probably should have reviewed the AMD version. Can’t imagine many people building a super high-end machine would choose Intel right now. The AMD version was also a little less expensive.
I used the AMD version of this board with a 9950x3d and it’s awesome. No other board looks as good as this one, wish I could post up some pics but they just don’t do it justice. The board is a masterpiece and in a glass case with liquid cooling and all the animations and lcd screen it’s mind blowing. It’s pricy for sure but nothing else like it out there. Myself, I used the money I saved from a cancelled weekend trip to pay for it lol. Zero regrets, I could stare at it for hours.
I think the name is kind of funny though It seems like if you truly were God-like you wouldn't need a computer at all. The fact that you need a computer belies you're God likeness.