Logitech launches MX Master 4 flagship productivity mouse – the best mouse we've tested adds haptic feedback, circular Action Ring shortcuts

Logitech launches MX Master 4
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Logitech's MX Master 3S has long held the top spot on our best wireless mouse list for its excellent scroll wheels, premium look, and comfort. But its days as our favorite productivity rodent may be numbered, as Logitech just took the wraps off its successor, the MX Master 4. The new model carries over everything we loved about the 3S, while adding haptic feedback and an "Action Ring" menu for quick access to commonly used tasks.

The haptic feedback resides in the thumb rest area, and has four intensity settings – although the default Medium setting felt right for me. The mouse can subtly vibrate to let you know you're connected or disconnected from a device, when battery life is low, and for app-specific purposes, like when your cursor hits a layout guideline in Adobe apps. It's an intuitive trick that feels like it has a lot of potential for productivity. But at launch, it feels a bit under-utilized.

Logitech launches MX Master 4

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

If you install Logitech's Options+ software, the MX Master 4 will also bring up an Actions Ring when you press the button embedded in the mouse's thumb rest. This circular menu, by default, gives you quick access to things like Windows Explorer, screen capture, media playback, and emojis. There's also an AI shortcut here, which fans out to give one-click access to ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot.

If any of those shortcuts don't appeal to you, the Action Ring can be customized via the company's Options+ software to do any number of things, including opening specific files, folders, or macros. You can also install plugins for a number of popular programs, although you'll have to log in to the Options+ software for this. The default Photoshop plugin is shown below.

Logitech launches MX Master 4

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

You can even use the Actions Ring to switch the mouse between connected devices – a feature that was previously relegated to a button placed inconveniently on the bottom of the device. It's not exactly an ordeal to flip the mouse over to switch between connected devices, but it's nice to have the option to do that in software.

Logitech launches MX Master 4

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Other changes include what Logitech says is "2x stronger" connectivity thanks to an improved chip, USB-C dongle, and better antenna placement.

Of course, many of the existing features from previous MX Master mice carry over to this model, including the best-in-class dual-mode MagSpeed scroll wheel on the top and a horizontal wheel on the side. There's also an 8K DPI sensor that works on glass and pretty much every other reasonable mousing surface. I can confirm it works pretty well on my leg.

Whether you opt for connecting via the RF USB transceiver or Bluetooth, Windows 10 and up and macOS 13 or later are supported, as is Linux and ChromeOS. Logitech says you should expect 70 days of use on a full charge, and three hours' use from a one-minute charge.

Logitech launches MX Master 4

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

We're working on a full review of the MX Master 4, so stay tuned for our full verdict after I've had the chance to spend more time with it. So far, the only downside I've noticed is that this is a heavy mouse. At 150 grams, it's 9g heavier than its predecessor. And while that isn't a big jump, the mouse does feel fairly substantial as modern rodents go.

With the lightest gaming mice hovering above or below 50 grams these days, the MX Master 4 isn't going to be my first choice at the end of the work day when I fire up Borderlands 4. Of course, for gaming, Logitech would point you to another new mouse with haptic feedback, the company's G Pro X2 Superstrike.

The MX Master 4 will be available in graphite, pale grey (white), and black, with Mac-specific models in black or white, with an MSRP of $119.99.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS

After a rough start with the Mattel Aquarius as a child, Matt built his first PC in the late 1990s and ventured into mild PC modding in the early 2000s. He’s spent the last 15 years covering emerging technology for Smithsonian, Popular Science, and Consumer Reports, while testing components and PCs for Computer Shopper, PCMag and Digital Trends.

  • Dr3ams
    Yeah, the MX Master 3S is definitely not for gaming. I had to RMA two of them because the left mouse button broke off while playing The Division 2. Peeking inside the mouse I saw that the button is connected by two thin arms. If your finger continually presses tightly higher up on that button (which happens while shooting), then the arms connecting the button snap. I really like the comfort and quality of the MX Master (especially the wheel) and I was hoping that Logitech would bring out a gaming version of it, but I guess that will never happen. I eventually bought a G903 to game with, but I hate the wheel on it.

    The MX Master 4 looks really good. I'll wait for a complete review to see if I will replace my 3S.
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    At 150 grams, it's 9g heavier than its predecessor.
    What a shame. The weight is what I found to be the biggest flaw of its predecessor.
    Instead of improving it, they have made it worse.
    I personally find the shape of the MX Master mice comfortable, but I regularly use mice half its weight.

    I notice that the sensor has been moved slightly to the left.
    A design principle when designing a mouse is to align 1) the sensor, 2) the centre of mass, and 3) the fingers that are used to grip the mouse. Is this an intentional improvement over the predecessor, or has the centre of mass shifted?
    Reply
  • das_stig
    £115 for a mouse is getting a bit rich even if it sings and dances, unless of course it was a real rodent.
    Would like to see the BOM for them to justify, just too much.
    Reply